Comparison of changes in vertical
dimension of the upper
and lower complete dentures processed using two
investing
methods
D.U. Kharat, BDS, MDS; Z. Fakiha, BDS, MS
College of
Dentistry, King Saud University, P.O.Box 60169, Riyadh 11545, Saudi
Arabia
Standardized compression molding technique was
used to process 14 sets of complete dentures. Seven sets of dentures were
invested by the conventional method and the other seven were invested by a modified
method. In the latter method, the second layer of the investment extended
occlusally only up to the maximum convexity on the labial/buccal and lingual
surfaces of the teeth. In the beginning, only the upper or the lower denture
was processed and changes in the vertical dimension of occlusion were measured.
After that, the other denture was also processed and the increase in the
vertical dimension of occlusion of the sets of dentures was measured. All
measurements were made at the incisal guide pin using a leaf gauge. Statistical
analysis using t-test showed no difference in the changes of vertical dimension
of the dentures processed by the two different methods of investing. However,
both of the methods of investing showed significantly more increase in vertical
dimension of the upper complete dentures than that of the lower comp-lete
dentures.
Increase in vertical dimension of occlusion dur ing the processing of
complete dentures demands serious consideration. Inherent properties of the
denture base resin and the dental stone used as an investing material are
responsible for this frustrating outcome. Cured acrylic resin exhibits 2% linear
or 6 to 7% volumetric shrinkage.1 Mohammed and Tsutsurm2 stated that the observed linear shrin kage,
due to curing, is actually less than 2% proba bly because at the curing
temperature, at which polymerization shrinkage would occur, the resin is quite
soft and its shrinkage is resisted by the mold. Grunewald3 reported that the excess acrylic resin in the
mold during final closure is responsible for the increased vertical dimension.
Lerner and Pfeif-fer4 suggested a
diaphragm, or layer of resin, on the land around the entire border
of the denture which acts as a cushion, and possibly as a reservoir which helps
to control the shrinkage. Pera5 advocated freezing the mold
before packing and provision of central exhaust in order to avoid increase in
the ver tical dimension. Vig6 proposed simple extension of
the wax-up maxillary denture onto the posterior aspect of the cast to correct
the shift of posterior teeth in processing. Such modifications in the pro
cessing technique are only partially successful in compensating for the
unfavourable properties of the acrylic resin. Taylor1 reported 4% elastic defor- mation of the
dental stone from packing pressure. Grant7 reported
tooth movement of 0.02 to 0.05 mm resulting from the setting expansion of the
sec ond pour of the investing stone. A study by Becker et al8 showed 0.162 mm vertical change in the
occlusal plane of the upper complete denture pro cessed using all stone mold.
Wesley et al9 stated that the exothermic reaction of
investing stone causes expansion of the wax leading to the change in tooth to
master cast relationship.
This investigation was undertaken to compare the increase in vertical
dimension of the complete dentures processed by: i) conventional method, and
ii) by reduced amount of dental stone used for the second layer of the mold.
The increase in the vertical dimension during processing of the upper complete
dentures, lower complete dentures, and sets of the dentures is reported.
Fourteen sets of identical upper and lower stone casts were prepared
using a flexible rubber mold (Whaledent International, New York, USA).
Record bases were prepared of autopolymerizing acrylic resin and occlusion rims
of the similar dimensions were made using pink baseplate wax. The casts were
indexed to facilitate remounting. Using a face bow and centric relation records
the upper and lower casts were mounted in alike posi tions in the Hanau articulator (Teledyne Hanau, Buffalo, NY, USA). Tooth arrangement of all the
14 sets of dentures was completed using Trubyte Bioform (Dentsply
International, USA) acrylic
resin anterior teeth and Biotone (Dentsply International, USA) acrylic
resin 30 degree cusp angle posterior teeth. All sets of teeth were of the same
mold. In centric occlusion, the contact of the supporting cusps namely;
palatal cusps of the upper teeth and buccal cusps ofthe lower teeth with the
respective fossae of the opposing teeth, was set-up and recon firmed using a
thin articulating paper (Produits Dentaires SA Vevey Suisse). Positive contact
of the incisal pin with the incisal table was rechecked and the thumb screw was
tightened. The wax-up was accomplished to have similar contour and equal bulk
to all of the upper as well as to the lower dentures. Varsity eject type Hanau flasks (Hanau Engineering Co. Buffalo, USA) were used for investing the dentures.
These sets of the dentures were equally divided
into two groups. To begin with, 4 upper dentures of 4 sets and 3 lower dentures
of the other 3 sets from group I were taken for processing. These trial
dentures were invested in dental stone (Labstone, Columbus Dental Mfg. Co, St. Louis, USA).
The three layer investing method was applied as described by Morrow et al.10 The second layer of the stone extended up to
the occlusal level of the teeth having cusp tips and incisal edges exposed
[Fig. 1], Wax elimination was carried out. The mold was packed using Permatone
(Kerr Mfg. Co, Ml, USA) cross-linked acrylic resin at
3000 psi and was polymerized at 165°F for 9 hours. After cool ing, the mold
was ejected from the flask, the invest ment was sectioned and pried out.
Attached parti cles of investment were carefully removed from the exposed
surfaces of the denture and cast. The pro cessed dentures attached to the
casts were remounted on their original mountings and sec ured using plaster of
paris. The rise of the incisal pin from the incisal table, in all of the seven
cases was measured using a leaf gauge
[Fig.2]. The leaf gauge was prepared from 4 ml (0.09978 mm) sheet of
polyester transparency film Type 174 as suggested by Resenblum and Huffman.11 The leaf gauge con tained 50 leaves. Tests
were carried out to deter mine the measuring accuracy of the leaf gauge. The
leaves were divided into 5 groups, each containing 10 leaves and its thickness
in each group was mea sured using verner caliper. Average of the reading
indicated 1.0012 mm thickness to 10 leaves, and 0.10012 mm thickness to a
single leaf. To start with, one leaf was placed on the incisal table and the
upper jaw was swung forward. The leaf was gently pulled out and ease or
resistance to pull is felt. If necessary, the procedure was repeated with an
added leaf each time, till resistance, while pul ling, was experienced.
Total thickness of the leaves required in the process denoted the distance
between the incisal table and the incisal pin up to an accuracy of 0.1 mm. The
increase in vertical dimension during the processing of the 4 upper complete
dentures and 3 lower complete dentures was obtained. The procedure was repeated
and the remaining 4 lower and 3 upper complete dentures of Group I were
processed, remounted, and incisal pin rise from the incisal table was measured.
The measurements indicated increase in vertical
dimension of the sets of the
dentures resulted by processing with conventional investing method.
The trial dentures from Group II were processed similarly but with
modification in investing. The second pour of the investing stone extended only
up to the maximum convexity on the labial, buc cal, and lingual surfaces of
the teeth fFig.3]. The collected data included the increase in vertical
dimension of 4 upper complete dentures, 3 lower complete dentures and 7 sets of
the complete dentures, as a result of processing by the modified investing
method.
Table 1 shows the incisal pin rise resulted from processing the
dentures in Group I by conventional investing methods. The mean increase in
vertical dimension of upper dentures processed by the conventional method was
0.675 mm, and that of the lower dentures was 0.233 mm. The mean increase in
vertical dimension resulted from pro cessing of upper dentures was 0.650 mm,
and that of lower dentures was 0.266 mm. Changes in verti cal dimension of the
upper dentures, as well as that of the lower dentures of the two groups, were
com pared by applying t-test statistics. The difference between vertical
dimension, as a result of proces sing the upper dentures by two different
investing methods, was not significant (t = 0.195 and P < 0.5). The
difference in the change, as a result of processing the lower dentures by two
different investing methods, was also insignificant (t = 0.247 and P < 0.5).
Average increase in vertical dimen sion of the sets of dentures processed by
conven tional investing method was 0.871 mm, and that of those processed with
the modified investing method was 0.671 mm. The difference between the two
groups was insignificant (t = 0.428 and P < 0.5).
Comparison of the average increase in vertical dimension of the upper
dentures with that of the lower dentures processed by conventional invest ing
method showed statistically significant differ ence. The computed t value was
3.100 and the level of significance was P > 0.02. This difference between
upper and lower dentures was also signif icant in the dentures processed by
the modified investing method (t = 4.590 and P > 0.001). Since the two investing
methods used in this study proved to be similar, the
average increase in vertical dimension of all the dentures from both groups was
calculated. It was 0.662 mm in upper denture, 0.250 mm in lower denture, and
0.771 mm in a set of complete dentures [Table 2).
This study revealed that the average increase in vertical dimension of
occlusion, after processing the upper complete denture, was more than that
resulted after processing the lower complete denture. This study does not offer
plausible expla nation for the difference in vertical dimension change of
upper and lower complete dentures due to processing. However, difference in the
amount of acrylic resin required and the polymerization shrinkage exhibited in
different areas of the upper and lower complete dentures may be responsible for
the difference. No reports were available in the literature, comparing
processing induced vertical dimension change in the upper vs that in the lower
complete dentures. Dental stone of the second layer of investment makes direct
contact with the wax of trial denture. Heat evolved during setting of the stone softens the wax and expansion of the
den tal stone causes tooth movement. Part of this study was aimed
towards reducing in the amount of den- tal stone used for pouring the second
layer of the investment in order to reduce the total amount of exothermic heat
and setting expansion. The results did not show statistically significant
reduction in the vertical dimension change. The quantity of dental stone
lessened was small, possibly 4 to 5 in. in height. Further, lowering of the
second layer of the investment will terminate it into the undercut area and deflasking
will become difficult. Curtailing the exothermic heat and setting expansion,
possibly was not sufficient to minimize the vertical dimen sion change.
Application of different investing media, use of various denture base resins and employment of sev
eral processing techniques had been tried to van quish vertical dimension
increase during processing of the dentures. In the literature, no report was
cited illustrating a system for abrogation of this conse quence. The studies
reporting increased vertical dimension of complete dentures, processed using
dental stone investing medium and compression molding technique, are summarized
in Table 3.
In the present study the increase in vertical dimension of occlusion
(measured at incisal pin) of all the 14 sets of complete dentures ranged
between 0.3 to 1.2 mm, with an average of 0.77 mm. The result compared
favorably with previous reports.
The investigation yielded the following informa
tion:
-
The
suggested modification in the investing method, for reducing the amount of
dental stone used for the second layer of mold, could not prevent the increase
in vertical dimension of complete dentures.
-
The
mean increase in the vertical dimension of the upper complete dentures was 0.66
mm and that of the lower complete dentures was 0.25 mm, and the difference was
statistically significant.
-
The
mean increase in the vertical dimension of the sets of complete dentures was
0.77 mm.
summary
An investigation was conducted to evaluate the change in vertical
dimension of the upper complete dentures, lower complete dentures, and the sets
of dentures processed by conventional investing method and by a modified
investing method. No difference was found between the results obtained by
processing of the dentures by the two investing methods. The increase in
vertical dimension of upper complete dentures as a result of processing was
more than that of the lower complete dentures. The vertical dimension change in
the sets of the complete dentures is comparable with previous reports cited in
the literature.
The authors would like to
thank F. Balucas, R.D. Sokyawan, T. Corpus, and R.A. Fasan for their assistance
in the laboratory procedures.
-
Taylor PB.
Acrylic resins their manipulation. J Am Dent Assoc 1941;28:373-87.
-
Al-Tahawi MH, Tsutsumi
S. Material systems in dentistry -II. University
of Florida, Florida, USA 1981: 2:133.
-
Grunewald AH,
Paffenbarger GC, Dicksons. The effect of molding processes on some properties
of denture resins. J Am Dent Assoc 1952;44:269-82.
-
Lerner H, Pfeiffer KR.
Minimum vertical occlusal changes in cured acrylic resin dentures. J Prosthet
Dent 1964;14:294-7.
-
Pera FL. Avoiding the
increase of the vertical dimension of dentures in processing. J Prosthet Dent
1968;19:364-9.
-
Vig RG. Method of
reducing the shifting of teeth in denture processing. J Prosthet Dent
1975;33:80-4.
-
Grant AA. Effect of the investment procedure on tooth movement. ]
Prosthet Deni 1962; 12:1053-8.
-
Becker CM, Smith DE,
Nicholls JI. The comparison of denture base processing techniques. Part II.
Dimensional changes due to processing. J Prosthet Dent 1977;37:450-9.
-
Wesley RC, Henderson D,
Fraxier QZ, Rayson JH, Ellinger CW, Lutes MR, Rahn AO, Haley JV. Processing
changes in complete dentures: posterior tooth contacts and pin opening. J
Prosthet Dent 1973;29:46-54.
-
Morrow RM, Rudd KD,
Rhoads JE. Dental laboratory procedures: complete dentures. 2n ded. St.
Louis:CV Mosby Co, 1986:287-305.
-
Resenblum RH, Huffman RW. Leaf gauge with consecutively numbered
leaves. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:652-4.
-
Mahler DB.
Inarticulation of complete denture processed by compression molding technique.
J Prosthet Dent 1951;1:551-9.
-
Keith RM, Tencate RL, Hurst WW. Use of layered silicone rubber mold
technique for denture processing. J Prosthet Dent 1961;11:644-57.
-
Shippee RW. Control of
increased vertical dimension of compression molded dentures. J Prosthet Dent
1961;11:1080-5.
-
Mainieri ET, Boone ME,
Potter RH. Tooth movement and dimensional change of denture base materials
using two investment methods. J Prosthet Dent 1980;44: 368-73.
-
Dukes BS, Fields H,
Morris JC, Jewell A. A comparative study of changes in vertical dimension of
occlusion using different investing mediums. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 49:568-71.
-
Dukes BS, Fields R,
Olson JW, Scheetz JP. A laboratory study of changes in vertical dimension using
a compression molding and a pour resin technique. J Prosthet Dent
1985;53:667-9.
-
Strohaver RA. Comparison of changes in vertical dimension between
compression and injection molded com plete dentures.J Prosthet Dent
1989;62:716-8.
|