|
Periodontal diseases and caries experience of
diabetic patients in an Arabian community
T.L. Al-Khateeb, BDS,PhD, N.H. Al-Amoudi, BDS,MS,DSc
H.H. Fatani, MRCS,LRCP,MBBS,MRCP, S.A. Mira, MRCS,LRCP,MBBS, MRCP,
M.S.
Ardawi, BMSc,MA,DPhil,FACB
Medical School and Allied Sciences, King Abdulaziz
University, P.O.Box 9029,
Jeddah
21413, Saudi
Arabia.
A group
of diabetic patients living in an Arabian community were matched by sex and age
with a non-diabetic control group. Examination for periodontal status and
dental caries was carried out on the
matched pairs. Diabetics exhibited more gingival inflammation and increased
probing depths when com pared with age-/sex-matched controls. The caries
experience of diabetic patients was higher than that of normal groups. The
findings of this study highlight the urgent need to develop a preventive dental
program for diabetic patients so as to minimize their experience of dental
disease.
Due to the heterogenous etiology of
diabetes mel-litus, it is difficult to produce art all-embracing single
definition. The disease is generally recognized by a particular degree of
hyperglycemia. However, diabetes mellitus
is now defined as a disease charac terized by chronic hyperglycemia
associated with disturbances of carbohydrate, lipid, and protein metabolism
that leads to the development of spe cific microvascular complications,
particularly in the eye, kidney, peripheral vessels, heart, and mouth. It is important
for clinicians to recognize the oral manifestations associated with metabolic
dis turbance. The association between diabetes mel litus and pathologic
changes in the oral cavity, especially affecting the periodontium, has been the
subject of many reports in the dental literature. While several studies on
adults have demonstrated more severe
periodontal disease in diabetics than in non-diabetics,1-7 Barnett et al,8 nevertheless, failed to find any correlation
between diabetes and periodontal disease.
The association between diabetes and
dental caries has received lesser attention than periodon tal disease.
However, the findings have also been controversial.9-14 The relationship between diab etes mellitus
and dental disease has, thus, been studied extensively with conflicting
results.
It is also
known, and worth mentioning here, that the prevalence and clinical features of
diabetes mellitus vary from one ethnic group to another.15 The
conflict of the results referred to might, there fore, be more apparent than
real, the variability being related to both genetic and environmental factors
such as over nutrition. According to this hypothesis, the authors felt it
important to investi gate the relationship between diabetes mellitus and
dental diseases in an Arabian community, that is, in a relatively stable ethnic
group.
The aim of this study, therefore, was
to compare the experience of periodontal disease and caries in age- and
sex-matched adult diabetics and non-diabetics in an Arabian community.
Two groups of 161 diabetic and 100
control sub jects were examined in the diabetic clinic of the Department of
Medicine at King Abdulaziz Univer sity Hospital (KAUH), Jeddah. The hospital
is located in the eastern part of Jeddah
and is the main University hospital in the western region of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. It has a catchment popu
lation of approximately 250,000 and acts as a refer ral center. Most of the
diabetic patients included in this study were obtained mainly from the KAUH.
However, because of the difficulty in obtaining all samples needed in this
study, patients from Al Shataah and King Fahd
Hospitals were requested
to participate. Both hospitals are recognized as teach ing hospitals in
Jeddah. The control group was age- and sex-matched with healthy individuals.
The controlled subjects were selected randomly from the general population by
choosing every second visitor who entered the general of the King Abdulaziz
University Hospital.
None of those selected were attending for any medical or dental treatment, or
otherwise. All control subjects were subjected to a thorough historical and
physical examination. The general recommendation on the standardization of
blood tests for diabetes was adopted. The assessment of the diabetic patients
was based on mean blood glucose (MBG), glycosylated haemoglobin (HbAIC)
and diabetic complications of neuropathy and retinopathy.
Following personal data
collection and record ing of age, sex, height and weight, each subject was
submitted to a medical examination for deter mination of the level of
metabolic control and diag nosis. Each subject was then sent to the dental
clinics of KAUH for dental examination. Table 1 shows the distribution of the
normal and diabetic subjects according to age, sex, height, and weight.
Table 1.
Distribution of the control and diabetic subjects according to age, sex,
height and weight.
Mean SEX Mean Mean
age Male Female height weight
(yrs) (cm) (kg)
Normal 43.2 58 42 161.6 69.4
subjects
Diabetic 47.9 76 85 161.7 73.5
patien
The periodontal
status was assessed by means of the CPITN system.16 CPITN recordings were made for sextants
containing at least two functional teeth, using the following code numbers:
Code O = healthy periodontal tissue
(H)
Code 1 = bleeding after probing (B)
Code 2 = supra or subgingival calculus and/or
overhanging(s) of filling(s) or crown(s) (C)
Code 3 = pathologic pocket(s)
4 or 5 mm (P1)
Code 4 = pathologic pocket(s) 6 or > 6 mm
(P2)
X = excluded sextant (X)
Besides the CPITN scores, the number
of teeth with caries (D), the number of missing teeth (M), and the number of
fillings (F) were separately recorded for each subject.
Following the dental examination,
plaque was scraped from the subgingival area by means of a curette. Plaque
samples were collected from 50 control subjects and 50 diabetic patients. The
col lected samples of plaque were placed
in special test tubes for isolating and counting anaerobic
lac-tobacilli.
All dental examinations were carried
out by two examiners. Duplicate examinations conducted prior to and during the
course of the clinical work revealed inter- and intra-examiner reliability of
over 90% for the two examiners (Table 2).
The collected data was transferred to
floppy disks and analyzed at the computer unit of King
Fahd Center
for Medical Research, King
Abdulaziz University.
Student's T-test was used to test differ ences between means of dental
parameters. Analysis of variance was used for statistical analysis of the biochemical
parameters.
Table 3 shows the results of blood
analysis of diabetic and non-diabetic subjects. Blood glucose and HbAIc values were markedly higher in diabetic
patients as compared to non-diabetic controls (P < 0.05).
Table
2. Intra- and inter-examiner reliability in recording dental examination.
Examiner N % of the
same
reading
Examiner No. (1) and Examiner No. (1) 20 93
Examiner No. (2) and Examiner No. (2) 20 97
Examiner
No. (1) and Examiner No. (2) 20 91
N =
number of subjects examined
Table
3. Blood glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin con-
centrations in diabetic and non-diabetic subjects studied.
Subject Glucose HbAIC
(m
mol/L) (%)
Non-diabetic: Mean 3.57 5.77
Minimum 2.30 3.50
Maximum 7.40 10.30
SD 1.57 1.53
Diabetic: Mean 8.71 7.48
Minimum 2.10 3.38
Maximum 24.10 14.40
SD 4.52 2.62
For
Blood Glucose: F
ratio =
16.631, DF = 156, P<0.05
For HbAIC: F
ratio =
5.567, DF = 135, P<0.05
The results of CPITN index are
presented in Table 4. Healthy gingiva (H) was found in an aver age of 1.01
sextants in the diabetics and in 3.10 sextants in the control subjects, a
difference which was statistically significant at P < 0.01.
Gingival bleeding after gentle
probing (B) was found in an average of 0.29
sextants in the diabetics and in 0.43 sextants in the control subjects,
a differ ence which was not statistically significant (P < 0.01).
Supra or subgingival calculus (C) was found in an average of 1.32 sextants in the
diabetics and in 1.70 sextants in the control subjects, a difference which was
not statistically significant (P< 0.01).
Pathologic pockets of 4.5 mm deep (P1)
were found in an average of 2.45 sextants in the diabetics and in 0.63 sextants
in the control subjects, a differ ence which was statistically significant at
P < 0.01.
Pathologic
pockets (P2) of 6 mm deep
were found in an average
of 0.91 sextants in the diabetic and in 0.14 sextants in the control group
subjects, a differ ence which was statistically significant at P < 0.01.
In this study the caries prevalence
among diabe tics (DMF = 12.76) was higher than among the controls (DMF =
10.75), and this difference was statistically significant at P <0.05 (Table
5).
Table 6 shows the results of
microbiological analysis of diabetic and non-diabetic subjects. The number of
positive results of anaerobic lactobacilli was higher in diabetic patients
compared to non-diabetic controls. However, the difference was not
statistically significant (P > 0.05).
Table 5. DMF of non-diabetic and diabetic groups.
Caries
D M F Free DMF
Non-diabetic 2.43 4.49 3.83 21.23 10.75
Diabetic 3.62 7.56 1.50 19.17 12.76
For DMFT : t-value = -2.51, DF = 257.66, p < 0.05
Table 6. Anaerobic lactobacilli in control subjects
and diabe
tic patients.
Anaerobic
lactobacill
N No.+ve %
Control subjects 50 5 10
Diabetic patients 50 7 14
N =
number of subjects, x2
= 0.3787, DF = Ip
>0.05
Evidence, which indicates that
patients par ticipating in the present study were generally diabe tics, was shown
by comparing the results of blood analyses noted in the present group with
those reported by other investigators. In effect, the values for blood glucose
and HbAIc in the Arabic
diabetic groups were similar to those reported elsewhere for diabetic patients.17,18
Clinical and epidemiological studies
have been carried out in many parts of the world to investigate the association
between diabetes and dental caries. Most studies were cross- sectional and
showed either higher9, similar,10,12 or lower13,14 caries experience among diabetics than among the controls. In the
present study, the caries experi ence of diabetics was higher than that of
non-diabetics. This is surprising in view of the fact that the lower intake of
refined carbohydrates, espe cially sucrose, and high protein content of the
diet make the dietary habits of diabetic subjects clearly less cariogenic than
among non-diabetics. This finding, therefore, raises the question as to
why adult diabetics develop as many new carious lesions as their healthy
counterparts in spite of the favorable diet. It has been reported that
streptococ cus mutans is of major etiological significance in human dental
caries. The capacity of this microor ganism to initiate dental caries depends
on its abil ity to produce adhesive extracellular polysacharides19 and to release organic acids which
demineralize tooth substance. The organic acids involved are end products of
the metabolism of fermentable substrates, especially sucrose, by the bacteria.
The more frequent the intake of suc rose, with the consequent production of
acid, the more disastrous is the effect upon tooth substance. To avoid
hypoglycemic shock, however, the diabetic may have to resort on occasions to
the fre quent use of sucrose, thus, creating an oral envi ronment which
facilitates the demineralization of tooth substance commonly referred to as
dental caries. In other words, diabetic patients may have more frequent meals
than normal subjects and repeated intakes of even small amounts of car bohydrates
may be cariogenic.
In addition, lactobacilli are aciduric
and acidogenic bacteria which are present in large numbers in the mouth of a
caries-active person.20 The growth of lactobacilli is also
favored by the fre quent intake of fermentable carbohydrates, 21 and salivary lactobacilli counts are useful in
predicting future caries activity.20 Since these bacteria were found to be as
numerous in diabetics as in non-diabetics
(Table 6), it seems that, in spite of sucrose restriction, generally in
the diet, the oral condition of diabetic patients is otherwise favorable for
the growth of cariogenic bacteria.
Another reason for the higher caries
experience in diabetic patients may be because of the high glu cose level in
the saliva and in the crevicular fluid promoting acid production in the dental
plaque.
In previous studies, the periodontal
status of patients with diabetes mellitus was assessed by using clinical
indices for plaque, gingivitis, periodontal pockets with loss of epithelial
attach ment, or were based on epidemiological indices such as Russel's Index.22 Recently, however, the "Community Periodontal
Index of Treatment Needs" (CPITN) has been widely used in epidemiological
studies as a method for assessing periodontal treatment needs. Although the
CPITN does not record the periodontal changes separately for all teeth, the
system has been found to produce reliable information on the periodontal status
and treatment needs in population groups.
The results obtained by the use of
the CPITN index in this study showed that the average number of sextants
displaying pathologic pockets (shallow and deep) are higher in the diabetic
than in the con trol group. The mean number of missing sextants was also
higher in the diabetic than in the control group, 2.1 and 1.3 respectively. The
difference was statistically significant at P < 0.05. In addition to the
mean number of missing sextants, the mean number of missing teeth was also
calculated. The mean number of missing teeth was found to be higher in the diabetics
than in the control group (7.59 and 4.49 respectively).
The
literature on diabetes mellitus is abound with conflicting results of studies
designed to investigate the association between it and dental disease in dif
ferent communities. This apparent conflict might, however, be more readily
acceptable if it was also accepted that the condition of diabetes mellitus
itself might be due to genetic and environmental factors which vary from
one community to another. The findings of the present study confirm that in an
Arabian community, the experience of both
periodontal disease and caries is greater in diabetic patients, and that
periodontal disease occurs in more severe forms in this group than in
non-diabetics.The results of this study highlight, in particular, the absolute
necessity for adopting preventive den tal health care programs so as to
minimize the pre valence of periodontal disease and, in addition, to prevent
the dental decay so abundantly seen in diabetic patients. By so doing, many of
the sys temic complications and infections seen in diabetic patients might
also be controlled.
The Research
Group acknowledge, with thanks, the invaluable assistance of Scientific
Research Council of King Abdulaziz University (SRCKAU), which granted us
financial support during this Research Project (No. 408/ 036). Our sincere
thanks are also due to Professor H.A. Zaki, DDS, MPH, MSD, who acted as
external consul tant
for this research project.
-
Belting
CM, Hiniker JJ, Dummett CO. Influence of Diabetes mellitus on the severity of
periodontal disease. J Periodontol 1964;35:476-80.
-
Finestone AJ, Boorujy SR. Diabetes
mellitus and periodontal disease. Diabetes 1967;16:336-40.
-
Glavind L, Lunk K, Loe H. The
relationship between periodontal state and diabetes duration, insulin dosage
and retinal changes. J Periodontol 1968;39:341-7.
-
Cohen
DW, Friedman LA, Shapiro J, Kyle GC, Franklin S. Diabetes mellitus and periodontal
disease: Two-year longitudinal observations, Part 1. J Periodontol
1970;41:709-12.
-
Campbell MJA. Epidemiology of periodontal
diseases in the diabetic and the non- diabetics. Austr Dent J 1972;17:274-8.
-
Sznajdr
N, Carraro JJ, Rugna S, Sereday M. Periodontal findings in diabetic and
non-diabetic patients. JPeriodontol 1978;49:445-8.
-
Rylander H, Ramberg P, Blohme C,
Lindhe J. Prevalence of periodontal disease in young diabetics. J Clin
Periodon
-
tol 1986;14:38-43.
-
Barnett
ML, Baker RL, Yancey, JM, MacMillan
DR, Kotoyan M. Absence of periodontitis in a population
of insulin dependent diabetesmellitus (IDDM) patients. J Periodontol 1984;55:402-5.
-
Stadtler P, Sulzer M, Petrin P.
Zumkariesbefall jugendlicker diabetiker. Wien Klin Wochenchr 1978;90:844-7.
-
Wolf J.
Dental and Periodontal conditions in diabetes mellitus. Proc Finn DentSoc
(Suppl 6) 1977;73:1-56.
-
Kjellman O, Henrksson CO, Berghagen IV, Andersson B. Oral
conditions in 105 subjects with insulin-treated diabetes mellitus. Swed Dent J
1970;63:99-110.
-
Faulcombridge AR, Bradshaw WCL, Jenkins
PA, Baum JD. The dental status of a group of diabetic children. Br Dent J
1981;151:253-5.
-
Sterky
G, Kjellman O, Hogberg O, Lofroth AL. Dietary composition and dental disease in
adolescent diabetics. Acta Pediat Scand 1971;60:461-4.
-
Mattson, L, Koyh G. Caries frequency
in children with controlled diabetes. Scand J Dent Res 1975;83:327-32.
-
Rimoin
DL, Schimke RN. Genetic disorders of the endocrine glands. St. Louis:CV Mosby Co, 1971:150-216.
-
Ainamo
J, Tervenon T, Ainamo A. CPITN-assessment of periodontal treatment needs among
adults in Ostrobothnia, Finland. Comm Dent Health
1986;3:153.
-
1 7. Kennedy L, Baynes W. Non-enzymatic
glycoslation and the chronic complications of diabetes: an overview.
Diabetologia 1984;26:93-8.
-
Lester E. The chemical value of
glycated haemoglobin and glycated plasma protein. Ann Clin Biochem
1989;26:2-15.
-
Hamada S, Slade HD. Biology
immunology and cariogenicity of streptococcus mutans. Microbial Rev
1984;44:33-84.
-
Crossner
CG. Salivary lactobacillus counts in the prediction of caries activity. Comm
Dent Oral Epidemiol 1981;9:182-90.
-
Sims W. The interpretation and use of
syncter test and lac tobacillus counts. J Am Dent Assoc 1970;80:135-9.
-
Campbell MJA. Epidemiology of
periodontal disease in the diabetic and non- diabetics. Austr Dent J
1972;17:274.

|