| SDJ |
| Editorial Board |
| Advisory Board |
| Information for authors |
| Submit manuscript |
| Subscribe to SDJ |
| Search SDJ |
| About SDJ |
| SDJ Current Issue |
| Journal Archives |
| 2010-22 |
| 22-1 |
ISSN (Print) 1013-9052
EISSN 1658-3558
P.O. Box 52500,
Riyadh 11563,
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| Tel. |
966-1-467-7328 |
| Fax. |
933-1-467-7308 / 966-1-467-7534 |
| Email |
saudidj@ksu.edu.sa |
|
A Simple Technique To Control Gagging
During Impression Making
F. M. Fahmi, BDS, MSc
College of Dentistry, King Saud University, P.O.Box 60169,Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia
This article describes a technique to control
gagging during impression making. When compared to those described in the
literature, the proposed technique is simple, suitable for various gagging
conditions and for different impression materials.
As defined at present, gagging is an involuntary retching reflex that
may be stimulated by some thing touching the sensitive parts of the oral
cavity.1 Psychological
problems which may have contri buted to the problem have also been reported.2,3 Conditions
such as nasal polyps, sinusitis, deviated nasal
septum, may also cause blockage of the nasal passages and precipitate a
gagging reflex.4
Psychological problems may cause a deaf patient to elicit a spasm of
gagging while viewing gagging of another patient.5 Other causes, such as inadequate free way
space3 or extensive vagus nerve distribution,6 are also capable of acting as predisposing
factors to gagging.
Twenty-seven
patients desiring treatment in the Department of Removable Prosthodontic Dental
Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud Univer sity, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,
categorized as having a gagging reflex comprised the study group. Each patient
displayed gagging either during intraoral examination or impression making.
Upon further evaluation, patients were classified as severe, mod erate, or
mild in their gagging reflex. The classification was based on the degree and
susceptibility of the patient to gagging as evidenced by his/her response to treatment as shown in Table 1. The
distribution of patients in relation to sex, type of prosthesis required
and impression material(s) used is shown in Table 2.
It was noticed that fear of the
patient was alleviated. Gagging was controlled and all patients were totally
diverted from the gagging stimuli and successful impressions were made.
techniques are reported in the literature to overcome the problem of
gagging during impres sion making. However, no single technique was found to
be suitable for every patient.13 Psycholog ical approaches
requiring prolonged procedures and highly cooperative patients to obtain good
results were reported.1,2 Surgery was not highly recommended and was not
suitable for all cases.7 The marble technique proposed by Singer8 required patient motivation.
It appears that his approach presents definite medico-legal risks in the event
of aspirating some of the marbles by the patient. Drugs, on the other hand,
have limited effect on mild cases and seem to
stimulate gagging for severe cases.13 Topical
anaesthetic may actually increase nausea and vomiting.11 This is due to the sense of numbness produced
in the sensitive palate and pharyngeal areas that may be subject to the
vomiting reflex. Centrally acting drugs - antihis tamines, sedatives
tranquilizers, parasympathetic and CNS depressants - offer only a short term
solu tion, especially for some severe cases.12 For the more severe cases, other complicated
techniques have been used. In some
hysterical cases, hypnosis and behavioral therapy were utilized.14 The technique proposed in this paper is
psychologically based and is similar to
those of Landa2 and Kovats1.
Distraction of the patient's attention from the stimuli is the base of
the method. The technique is simple as compared to many of those discussed
above. With the personal participation of the patient, the impression making
process was smooth and effortless since it has given him the confidence and
control over the situation. Such participation probably permits self-assurance
that a disaster could be avoided. The technique has been shown to be accurate
and valid irrespective of the severity of gagging reflex and the impression
materials used. The completed prostheses (complete or partial) were clinically
assessed and were found to be quite successful and satisfactorily fitted.
|







