|
A Simple Technique To Control Gagging
F. M. Fahmi, BDS, MSc
College of Dentistry, King Saud University, P.O.Box 60169,Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia
This article describes a technique to control
gagging during impression making. When compared to those described in the
literature, the proposed technique is simple, suitable for various gagging
conditions and for different impression materials.
As defined at present, gagging is an involuntary retching reflex that
may be stimulated by some thing touching the sensitive parts of the oral
cavity.1 Psychological
problems which may have contri buted to the problem have also been reported.2,3 Conditions
such as nasal polyps, sinusitis, deviated nasal
septum, may also cause blockage of the nasal passages and precipitate a
gagging reflex.4
Psychological problems may cause a deaf patient to elicit a spasm of
gagging while viewing gagging of another patient.5 Other causes, such as inadequate free way
space3 or extensive vagus nerve distribution,6 are also capable of acting as predisposing
factors to gagging.
Different techniques to manage gagging have been reported in the
literature. Leslie7 adopted a surgical technique; Singer8 placed five marbles in the mouth; Landa,2 Krol,3 and Kovats1 mentioned psychological approaches.
Psychotherapy hypnosis was applied by Shaw9 and
Weyanat.10 Behavioral therapy was used by Appleby and
Day.5 Pharmacological agents have also been used. Peripherally acting drugs,
i.e. topi cal anaesthesia sprays, gels or lozenges, and injec tions, have
been widely used in clinical techniques.11 On the
other hand, centrally acting drugs, i.e. antihistamines, sedatives,
tranquilizers, and CNS depressants, have also been used to treat the problem.12
Twenty-seven
patients desiring treatment in the Department of Removable Prosthodontic Dental
Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud Univer sity, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,
categorized as having a gagging reflex comprised the study group. Each patient
displayed gagging either during intraoral examination or impression making.
Upon further evaluation, patients were classified as severe, mod erate, or
mild in their gagging reflex. The classification was based on the degree and
susceptibility of the patient to gagging as evidenced by his/her response to treatment as shown in Table 1. The
distribution of patients in relation to sex, type of prosthesis required
and impression material(s) used is shown in Table 2.
The method described consists of asking the patient to participate in
the impression making. Each patient was taught how to place, support, and
remove the impression after setting by himself. The following steps were
followed in each case:
-
During
each of the primary and final impres sions, a 10-minute session was devoted to
the patient to explain the purpose, function, and handling of trays. Alginate
was used for the pri mary impressions in all cases. According to the case and
condition, the final impression was made using either ZOE impression paste or
polysulfide rubber base material.
-
The
tray was border-molded by the patients using low-fusing compound. The patient
was shown how to hold the empty tray and insert it into his mouth, seat it,
then make some cheek and lip movements.
-
The
tray was inspected, loaded with the impre ssion material and, again, the
patient was directed to seat it by himself with gentle pres sure.
-
Muscle
trimming and facial massage were done by the operator while the patient held
the tray in position.
It was noticed that fear of the
patient was alleviated. Gagging was controlled and all patients were totally
diverted from the gagging stimuli and successful impressions were made.
techniques are reported in the literature to overcome the problem of
gagging during impres sion making. However, no single technique was found to
be suitable for every patient.13 Psycholog ical approaches
requiring prolonged procedures and highly cooperative patients to obtain good
results were reported.1,2 Surgery was not highly recommended and was not
suitable for all cases.7 The marble technique proposed by Singer8 required patient motivation.
It appears that his approach presents definite medico-legal risks in the event
of aspirating some of the marbles by the patient. Drugs, on the other hand,
have limited effect on mild cases and seem to
stimulate gagging for severe cases.13 Topical
anaesthetic may actually increase nausea and vomiting.11 This is due to the sense of numbness produced
in the sensitive palate and pharyngeal areas that may be subject to the
vomiting reflex. Centrally acting drugs - antihis tamines, sedatives
tranquilizers, parasympathetic and CNS depressants - offer only a short term
solu tion, especially for some severe cases.12 For the more severe cases, other complicated
techniques have been used. In some
hysterical cases, hypnosis and behavioral therapy were utilized.14 The technique proposed in this paper is
psychologically based and is similar to
those of Landa2 and Kovats1.
Distraction of the patient's attention from the stimuli is the base of
the method. The technique is simple as compared to many of those discussed
above. With the personal participation of the patient, the impression making
process was smooth and effortless since it has given him the confidence and
control over the situation. Such participation probably permits self-assurance
that a disaster could be avoided. The technique has been shown to be accurate
and valid irrespective of the severity of gagging reflex and the impression
materials used. The completed prostheses (complete or partial) were clinically
assessed and were found to be quite successful and satisfactorily fitted.
A simple technique to alleviate the problem of gagging during
impression making has been described. In clinical trials, the method was quite
helpful irrespective of the severity of the reflex and impression material. In
extremely severe gagging reflex cases, the method reduced the severity to the
point of becoming quite manageable.
-
Kovats ]]. Clinical
evaluation of the gagging denture patient.J Prosthet Dent 1971;36:6!3.
-
Landa
JS. Practical full denture
prosthesis. London, Kimpton 1954;363-75.
-
Krol
J. A new approach to the gagging problem. J Prosthet Dent1963;13;611.
-
Barlet
KA. Gagging a case report. Am J Clin
Hypn 1971;14:54.
-
Appleby
RC, Day HJ. Gagging as related to prosthetic dentistry. Iowa State
DentJ 1956;42:142.
-
Wright
SM. The radiologic anatomy of patients who gags with dentures. J Prosthet Dent
1981 ;45:127.
-
Leslie SW. A new
operation to overcome gagging as an aid to denture construction. J Can Dent
Assoc 1940;6:291.
-
Singer lL. The marble
technique: A method for treating the "hopeless gagger" for complete dentures.J
Prosthet Dent 1973;29:146.
-
Shaw Si. A competent
approach to the treatment of gagging, tic douloureux, and bruxism with the use
of hypnosis. J Am Soc Psychosom Dent Med 1962;9:13.
-
Weyanat
FA. Three reports in dental hypnotherapy. Am J Clin Hypn 1972;15:49.
-
Schole ML. Management
of the gagging patient. J Prosthet Dent 1959;9:578.
-
Saunders WH.
intravenous Valium for the gagging patient. Trans Acad Opthalmol Otolaryngol
1973;77:411.
-
Conny DJ, Tedesco LA.
The gagging problem in pros-thodontrc treatment. Part 1: Identification and
causes. J Prosthet Dent 1983,-49:601.
-
Epstein LH, Hershen M.
Behavioral control of hysterical gagging. J Clin Psychol 1974;30:102.

|