• JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator

ISSN (Print) 1013-9052
EISSN 1658-3558

The Saudi Dental Journal,
P.O. Box 52500,
Riyadh 11563,
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Tel.
966-1-467-7328
Fax.
933-1-467-7308 /
966-1-467-7534
Email
saudidj@ksu.edu.sa

Sealant bond strengths and etching pattern on enamel defects

 

F. Salama, BDS, MS*, J. Barenie, DDS, MS**
C. Fairhurst, PhD**, M. Diab, BDS, MS*

* Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University,
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
** Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Medical College of Georgia, USA.


Smooth surface enamel defects could benefit from sealants. The objectives of this study were to determine bond strength of a sealant on defective enamel compared to normal enamel and to evaluate the etch patterns on both. Thirty-six extracted permanent molars were used in this study. Ten molars with normal enamel surfaces and ten molars with defective enamel surfaces were used to measure bond strengths using an Instron Universal testing facility. Ten molars, half with normal and half with defective enamel were used to evaluate etching patterns using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Six teeth, three with normal and three with defective enamel, were used to examine application and adaptation of sealant to smooth surface enamel using a dissec­tion microscope. Bonding of sealant to normal enamel (16.90 ± 8.08 MPa) was significantly greater than that to defective enamel (9.06 ± 5.39 MPa), (t = 2.55, P 3= 0.02). SEM examination of etched normal enamel showed mostly type 2 etching patterns. In contrast,

showed vague resemblance to etched normal enamel. In addition, SEM examination showed close contact of sealant to etched enamel surface. The results of this study suggest that defective enamel does not etch as well as normal enamel which may explain the reduced bonding.

 

Saudi Dental Journal 1992;4(1):15-20.

 
Website designed and maintained by DeltaCAS