• JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator

ISSN (Print) 1013-9052
EISSN 1658-3558

The Saudi Dental Journal,
P.O. Box 52500,
Riyadh 11563,
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Tel.
966-1-467-7328
Fax.
933-1-467-7308 /
966-1-467-7534
Email
saudidj@ksu.edu.sa


The effect of Benzylisothfocyanate on epithelial changes

induced by trauma and DMBA in the hamster tongue


A.M. AlDosari, BDS, MSD, PhD*, A.H. Kafrawy, BDS, MSD;**
S.M. Standish, DDS, MSD**
* King Saud University, College of Dentistry, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
 ** Indiana University, School of Dentistry, IN, USA.
Abstract 

 
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of benzylisothiocyanate (BIT) on the epithelial changes induced by trauma and dimethylbenzanthracin (DMBA). Eighty male Syrian golden hamsters, five weeks old, were randomly divided into four groups. Group I received repeated trauma and mineral oil painting to the middle third of the right lateral border of the tongue. Group II was traumatized in the same way as Group I and received painting of the wound with BIT. Group III received similar trauma and painting of the wound with DMBA. Group IV received trauma plus DMBA and BIT painting in alternate dose.
Gross findings showed reduction in the development of persistent ulcers and papillary lesions in the animals that received BIT painting. Microscopic examination revealed epithelial changes ranging from mild dysplasia to invasive carcinoma in all animals. In Groups II and IV, fewer animals showed these changes, and the carcinomas seen in the two groups tended to be well differentiated when compared to the others.The results indicated that BIT retarded the development of neoplastic changes induced by trauma or trauma plus DMBA.

Introduction

 
For many years chewing sticks were used as a natural tooth brush in different parts of the world especially in Islamic countries.1,2 Many studies have been published about such natural toothbrush and its importance in oral health. Most of these studies concerned the anticariogenic effect of the different types of chewing sticks and their role in reducing cariogenic bacteria and limiting inflammatory changes in the oral soft tissue.3-7
Some investigators have pointed out that some chewing sticks like Dialium guiveenes, Diospyros tricolor, Fagara zanthoxyloides, Garcinia kola, Massularia and Rhus glabra have anticarcinogenic activity.7-8 Recent studies have shown the presence of benzylisothiocyanate (BIT) in the roots of Saivadora persica, the most popular chewing stick in Saudi Arabia.9 BIT is classified as one of the chemo-preventive agents that are thought to prevent carcinogenic and other genotoxic compounds from reaching or reacting with the target sites on the treated tissues.10 BIT and closely related compounds, such as phenethylisothio- cyanate and benzylthiocyanate, are found naturally in cruciferous vegetables like cabbage, brussels sprouts, broccoli, and cauliflower.11,12
Wattenberg13 reported that the systemic admin­ istration of BIT to Sprague-Dawley rats which were exposed to dimethylbenzanthracin (DMBA) resulted in a lower incidence of mammary neop­ lasms and a decrease in the average number of tumors per animal. In another study, the addition of BIT to a diet containing benzo (a)pyrene inhi­ bited carcinogenesis of the mouse's fores-tomach.14
A search of the dental literature did not reveal any previous research on the effect of BIT on the tissues of the oral cavity. The present study was designed to test the effect of BIT on epithelial changes induced in the tongue of hamsters by repeated trauma and DMBA application.
For many years chewing sticks were used as a natural tooth brush in different parts of the world especially in Islamic countries.1,2 Many studies have been published about such natural toothbrush and its importance in oral health. Most of these studies concerned the anticariogenic effect of the different types of chewing sticks and their role in reducing cariogenic bacteria and limiting inflammatory changes in the oral soft tissue.3-7
Some investigators have pointed out that some chewing sticks like Dialium guiveenes, Diospyros tricolor, Fagara zanthoxyloides, Garcinia kola, Massularia and Rhus glabra have anticarcinogenic activity.7-8 Recent studies have shown the presence of benzylisothiocyanate (BIT) in the roots of Saivadora persica, the most popular chewing stick in Saudi Arabia.9 BIT is classified as one of the chemo-preventive agents that are thought to prevent carcinogenic and other genotoxic compounds from reaching or reacting with the target sites on the treated tissues.10 BIT and closely related compounds, such as phenethylisothio- cyanate and benzylthiocyanate, are found naturally in cruciferous vegetables like cabbage, brussels sprouts, broccoli, and cauliflower.11,12
Wattenberg13 reported that the systemic admin­ istration of BIT to Sprague-Dawley rats which were exposed to dimethylbenzanthracin (DMBA) resulted in a lower incidence of mammary neop­ lasms and a decrease in the average number of tumors per animal. In another study, the addition of BIT to a diet containing benzo (a)pyrene inhi­ bited carcinogenesis of the mouse's fores-tomach.14
A search of the dental literature did not reveal any previous research on the effect of BIT on the tissues of the oral cavity. The present study was designed to test the effect of BIT on epithelial changes induced in the tongue of hamsters by repeated trauma and DMBA application.

Materials and Methods

 
Eighty male Syrian golden hamsters, five weeks old, were used. They were caged individually, weighed weekly, and fed rat chow and water ad libitum. They were divided into four equal groups as follows:
Group I:       Animals in this group were traumatized at the middle third of the right lateral border of the tongue three times a week with a barbed broach. The traumatized part, as well as the middle third of the lateral border of the left side the tongue, was then painted with mineral oil.
Group II:        In   this   group,    the   animals   were traumatized as in Group I, and received painting of the wound and the middle third of the lateral border of the left side of the tongue with BIT* in mineral oil vehicle.
Group III:       The middle third of the lateral border of the right   side of the tongue was traumatized with barbed broach followed by a painting with DMBA** three times a week.
Group IV:       Animals of this group were traumatized in the same way as group III. The traumatized area was painted with BIT and DMBA three times a week in alternate dose. DMBA was applied 48 hours before the application of BIT
BIT was dissolved in heavy mineral oil at a concentration of 50 mg of BIT per 1 ml of mineral oil. DMBA was dissolved in a heavy mineral oil to a final concentration of 0.5% solution. Both chemical agents were applied to the treated sites with a No. 4 camel's hair brush. The solution was in contact with area of application for at least five seconds. All precautions were followed while handling the biohazardous materials, including the wearing of disposable gloves, masks, and laboratory coats.
Prior to traumatization, the animals were sedated by intramuscular injection of xylazine 20 mg/ml at a dose of 0.6 mg (0.03 ml)/100 g body weight. The injections were given in the thigh, alternating sides at successive injections. Following induction of surgical anesthesia, the hamster tongue was pulled forward with a pair of pincers. The tips of the pincers were covered with rubber tubing to minimize non-experimental trauma to the tongue. The tongues were rotated to the left side so that the middle third of the right lateral border became horizontally positioned. A barbed broach was used to abrade the tongue by passing it several times in parallel strokes on the mucosa until the epithelium was visually damaged and/or cutting wounds were noted
The tongues were observed every other day throughout the experiment for gross changes, and selected examples were photographed. After 12 weeks of the first treatment, ten of the 20 hamsters in each group were randomly selected for sacrifice by C02 inhalation and opening of the thoracic cavity to assure death. Each animal was dissected, and the tongues were removed for microscopic examination. Treatment of the remaining 10 animals was continued for another 12 weeks. Gross tissue changes were periodically observed and recorded. At the end of the 24th week, all remaining animals were sacrificed and the tongues were removed for microscopic examination.
The histologic criteria evaluated in this study included those changes described as disturbances in polarity, drop-shaped rete ridges, polymorphism, hyperchromatism, basal cell hyperplasia, alteration in the nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio, increased mitoses, and intraepithelial keratinization. The epithelial alterations from normal were divided into three main types: dysplasia, carcinoma-in-situ, and invasive carcinoma. Dysplasia, defined as alteration of development, was classified as mild, moderate or severe, depending on the degree of the above mentioned changes. Carcinoma-in-situ indicated a dyspiastic "top to bottom" change, with the basement membrane still intact. In cases where the basement membrane was disrupted, a diagnosis of invasive carcinoma was assigned.

Results

 

During both study periods, all animals were observed before each treatment for changes at the treated sites or adjacent areas. Changes seen grossly were recorded according to one or more of the following categories:

  1. Leukoplakia: White patches occurring at the treatment site which might be removed totally or partly by scratching. Such changes were quite prominent in Groups I and III.
  2. Persistent Ulcers: Lesions at the treatment sites which failed to show signs of healing at the time of examination. These changes were noted more frequently in Groups I and III, whereas they were seen in only one animal of Group II and two animals of Group IV.
  3. Papillary Lesions: Small, sessile or pedunculated growths varying in size from 1 mm to 3 mm in diameter, and easily scraped off during treatment. All groups exhibited such changes, but they were less frequent in Group II.
  4. Delayed Healing: Treated sites which failed to show complete healing in comparison with the other animals. Animals with these changes tended to bleed easily at subsequent treatment. Such changes were recorded only in Groups II and IV.

Distribution of the gross findings are summarized in Table 1 [Figs. 1,2]. Results of histological examination of the tongues for all groups are summarized in Table 2. Some examples of such changes are shown in Figures 3-5
Results were analyzed using the variance and subsequent studentized range "q" tests for arcsine transformation of percentage data. No significant differences were detected between the four groups in the development of leukoplakia and papillary lesions during both study periods. A significant difference in the development of persistent ulcers and delayed healing was seen between Groups I and III, and Groups II and IV (P<0.05) during the first study period. The differences were not significant during the second part of the study.
Analysis of the microscopic changes with invasive carcinoma indicated that the only significant difference between groups was between Groups II and III during the first part of the study (P<0.05). Comparing the study periods within each group showed a significant difference in Group I (P<O.05). No significant differences could be detected within the other groups.

Discussion

 

Many studies have investigated the role of carcinogenic agents in the development of lingual neoplastic changes in animals.15-22 The findings in relation to chronic trauma as a possible cause for these changes are not consistent in all studies. Fujita et al18 reported that no tumors developed in 10 hamsters which received scratching alone. Marefat and Shklar15 found that after 15-16 weeks of traumatizing the middle third of the lateral border of the tongue, the 10 hamsters in their study developed hyperkeratosis and areas of dysplasia. Yin23 reported that after 12 weeks, three of 10 animals exhibited severe dysplasia, four carcinoma-in-situ, and three had invasive carcinoma. After 24 weeks, two animals showed mild to moderate dysplasia, four had severe dysplasia, and three had invasive carcinoma. In this study, of the 10 hamsters which had been traumatized and received applications of mineral oil for 12 weeks, one developed mild to moderate dysplasia, one developed severe dysplasia, and eight developed invasive carcinoma. After 24 weeks, all animals had invasive carcinoma.
These variations could be attributed to more than one variable. The strain of the animals may play a role, and it has been shown that inbred Syrian hamsters are highly susceptible to carcinogens.24,25 The degree of trauma may have an effect; it has been reported that different intensities of skin irritation caused different degrees of epidermal proliferation.26 Furthermore, in the present study the traumatized sites were painted with heavy mineral oil after each treatment that may have contributed to the high incidence of invasive carcinoma. None of the previous studies applied heavy mineral oil at the site of trauma.
Experiments in which the use of DMBA was combined with trauma have produced varied results depending on the type of dissolving solution. A reduction in the activity of DMBA was reported when heavy mineral oil was used as a vehicle.15 In 1973, Fujita and associates18 reported the development of lingual carcinoma in all animals which were treated with both trauma and DMBA in acetone for 13 to 25 weeks. Marefat and Shklar15 investigated the effect of trauma combined with DMBA dissolved in two different vehicles. In hamsters which received DMBA in heavy mineral oil for 15-16 weeks, only one developed carcinoma-in-situ; the remaining animals showed hyperkeratosis and dysplasia. All animals in the other group which were treated with DMBA in acetone developed early carcinoma by 12-13 weeks, and the lesions became advanced by 15-16 weeks. Yin23 used heavy mineral oil as the vehicle for DMBA and found that within 12 weeks and out of nine animals, two developed severe dysplasia, five developed carcinoma-in-situ, and two developed invasive carcinoma. After 24 weeks, three hamsters showed severe dysplasia, two showed carcinoma-in-situ, and five showed invasive carcinoma.
The microscopic findings in the present study showed that all animals, in both study periods, developed invasive carcinoma. This result agrees with the findings of both Fujita et al18 and Marefat and Shklar15 when they used DMBA in acetone. Thus, a similarity is apparent between the action of DMBA in this study and in those studies in which it was dissolved in acetone. This observation raises an important question concerning the method by which the DMBA is dissolved in the heavy mineral oil. The earlier studies gave no details on this matter. In the present investigation, the temperature of the heavy mineral oil was raised gradually while stirring until the solution became clear. Also, supporting the view that the activity of DMBA in heavy mineral oil in the present study was comparable to its activity in acetone, was the appearance of neoplasms at untreated sites in seven of the 18 treated animals, one in the floor of the mouth and six in the cheek. This is similar to what was reported by Eveson and MacDonald21 when 12 out of 20 animals developed carcinomas outside the treated area. Fujita and associates19 also noted the development of large carcinomas at untreated sites in some of their experimental animals.
In the oral cavity, few compounds with chemop-reventive action have been tried. Shklar and Marefat27 reported that the systemic administration of 13-cis-retinoic acid significantly delayed the development of lingual tumors both grossly and microscopically. A similar result was obtained with the DMBA carcinogenesis in hamster buccal pouch.28 Vitamin E inhibition of hamster buccal pouch carcinogenesis has been reported.29 In one study, both selenium and 13-cis-retinoic acid were used, and the combined inhibitory effect was not greater than with retinoic acid alone.30
In the present study, the gross findings indicated that animals receiving topical application of BIT tended to show lower incidence of persistent ulcers and papillary lesions, but at the same time presented another feature which was referred to as delayed healing. During both periods of the study, only three animals painted with BIT showed persistent ulcers. This decrease in persistent ulcer formation could be related to the reported antibiotic effect of BIT.31 The role of BIT in the development of delayed healing is not clear. Delayed healing with BIT may be related to a process of interfering with normal keratinization of the traumatized sites. This interference could explain the relatively lower number and small size of white patches in this group of animals. This observation is similar to the clinical findings of Shah and associates32 in treating patients with oral leukoplakia. In their study, patients were instructed to keep lozenges of 13-cis-retinoic acid in their mouths and allow them to dissolve slowly. In some patients, the initial response was thinning of the leukoplakia with reduction in the whitish surface, leaving a reddish, velvety epithelium which eventually assumed the color and texture of the normal adjacent mucosa.
Microscopic examination of the tongues of animals which received trauma and BIT painting indicated that after 12 weeks one of 10 animals developed mild to moderate dysplasia, two severe dysplasia, one carcinoma-in-situ, and six invasive carcinoma. After 24 weeks, one showed mild to moderate dysplasia and nine developed invasive carcinoma. Of the animals which received trauma, BIT and DMBA, one developed carcinoma-in-situ and nine invasive carcinoma during the first study period. In the second period of the study, two showed carcinoma-in-situ and six invasive car­cinoma. The carcinomas in both groups tend to be more well-differentiated histologically and less invasive than those in the other two groups, especially during the first part of the study. These findings are similar to the reported results with some other chemopreventive agents in retarding the development of induced carcinoma.27,28,30
The exact mechanism by which BIT and related compounds act in reducing the neoplastic changes at the treated sites is not clear. It might produce its protective effect by interfering with the metabolism of carcinogens through activation of DT-diaphorase and glutathione transferase, which have an important role in detoxification and conjugation of these agents.33-35


References

 

  1. Elvin-Lewis M. Plants used for teeth cleaning throughout the world. J Prevent Dent 1980;6:61 -70.
  2. Lewis WH. Plants used as chewing sticks. J Prevent Dent 1980;6:71-3.
  3. Elvin-Lewis M, Kendell K, Lewis WH, Harwood M. Anti-cariogenic potential of chewing sticks. J Dent Res 1974;53:277.
  4. Lewis WH, Elvin-Lewis M. Medical botany. New York:Wi!ey and Sons, 1977: 230-44.
  5. Peach MJ. Anions, phosphate, iodine, fluoride and other anions. In: pharmacological basis of therapeutics. Good­man LS and Gilman A eds. New York:McMillan and Co, 1975:798-808.
  6. Buadu CY, Borkaye-Yiadom AE. The antibacterial activity of some Ghanian chewing sticks. Ghana Pharma J 1973;1:150.
  7. Mohammad S, Mohammad A. Significance of chewing sticks (miswak) in oral hygiene from a pharmacological viewpoint. J Pakistan Med Assoc 1981; 31(4): 89-95.
  8. Thomas RH. Naturally occurring quinones. 2nd ed. New York:Academic Press, 1971:229.
  9. Ezmirly ST, El-Nars MMS. Isolation of glucotropaelin from Safvadora persica. J Chem Soc Pak 1981 ;3(1):9-12. 
  10. Wattenberg LW. Inhibition of carcinogenic effects of polycyclic hydrocarbons by benzylisothiocyanate and related compounds. J Nat'l Cancer Inst 1977;58:395-8.
  11. Kjaer A. Naturally occurring isothiocyanate and their parent glycosides. In : N. Kharasched, Chemistry of organic sulfur compounds, Vol 1. Elmsford, NY:Pergamon Press, 1961:409-20.
  12. 1 2. Virtanen A. Some organic sulfur compounds in vegetables and fodder plants and their significance in human nutrition. Agnew Chem (Engl) 1962;1:299-306.
  13. Wattenberg LW. Inhibition of carcinogenic effects of polycyclic hydrocarbons by benzylisothiocyanate and related compounds. J Nat'l Cancer Inst 1977;58:395-8.
  14. Wattenberg LW. Inhibition of carcinogen-induced neoplasia by sodium cyanate, tertbutylisocyanate, and benzyl isothiocyanate administered subsequent to carcinogen exposure. Cancer Res 1981;41:2991-4.
  15. Marefat P, Shklar G. Experimental production of lingual leukoplakia and carcinoma. Oral Surg 1977;44:578-86.
  16. Dachi SF. Experimental production of carcinomas of the hamster tongue. J Dent Res 1967,-46:1480.
  17. Giunta J, Shklar G. Studies on tongue carcinogenesis in rats using DMBA with and without cyanoacrylate adhe­sive. Arch Oral Biol 1972;17:617-22.
  18. Fujita K, Kaku T, Sasaki M, OnoeT. Experimental production of lingual carcinomas in hamsters by local application of 9,10-dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene. J Dent Res 1973;52:327-32.
  19. Fujita K, Kaku T, Sasaki M, Onoe T. Experimental production of lingual carcinomas in hamsters: tumor characteris­tics and site formation, J Dent Res 1973;52:1176-85.
  20. Marefat MP, Shkfar G. Lingual carcinogenesis in an inbred strain of hamsters. J Oral Pathol 1978;7:38.
  21. W, MacDonald DG. Hamster tongue carcinogenesis. I. Characteristics of the experimental model. J Oral Pathol 1981;10:322-31.
  22. Maeda H, Kameyam Y. Effect of excisional wounding on DMBA-induced hamster tongue carcinogenesis. J Oral Pathol 1986;15:21-7.
  23. Yin SR. Induction of epithelial lesions on the hamster tongue by trauma and application of alcohol and DMBA. Master's Thesis, Indiana University School of Dentistry, 1985.
  24. Marefat MP. The effect of the short dose schedule of DMBA application in inducing lingual neoplasia in inbred Syrian hamsters. J Oral Pathol 1985;14:383-9.
  25. Bernfeld P, Homburger F, Russfield AB. Strain differences in the response of inbred Syrian hamsters to cigarette smoke inhalation. J Nat'l Cancer Inst 1974;53:1141-57.
  26. Argyris TS, Slaga TJ. Promotion of carcinomas by repeated abrasion in initiated skin of mice. Cancer Res 1981;41:5193-5.
  27. Shklar G, Marefat P, Kornhauser A, Trickier DP, Wallace KD. Retinoid inhibition of lingual carcinogenesis. Oral Surg 1980;49:325-32.
  28. Shklar G, Schwartz J, Grau D, Truckler DP, Wallace KD. Inhibition of hamster buccal pouch carcinogenesis by 13-cis-retinoic acid. Oral Surg 1980;50:45-52.
  29. Weerapradist W, Shklar G. Vitamin E inhibition of hamster buccal pouch carcinogenesis. Oral Surg 1982;54;304-12.
  30. Goodwin WJ Jr, Huijing F, Bordash GD, Altman N. Inhibition of hamster tongue carcinogenesis by selenium and retinoic acid. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1986;95:162-6.
  31. Pulverer G. Allyl isothiocyanate: a new broad spectrum anbtibiotic from nasturtium. German Med Monthly 1969;14:27-30.
  32. Shah JP, Strong EW, DeCosse JJ, Itri L, Sellers P. Effects of retinoids on oral leukoplakia. Am J Surg 1983;146:466-70.
  33. Benson AM, Barretto PB. Effects of disulfiram, diethyl-dithiocarbamate, bisethylxenthogen, and benzyl isothiocyanate on glutathione transferase activity in mouse organs. Cancer Res 1985;45:4219-23.
  34. Benson AM, Barretto PB, Stanley JS. Induction of DT-diaphorase by anti- carcinogenic sulfur compounds in mice. J Nat'l Cancer Inst 1986;76:467-73.
  35. Benson AM, Hunkeller MJ, Talalay P. Increase of NAD(P)H: quinone reductase by dietary antioxidants: possible role in protection against carcinogenesis and toxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1980;77:5216-20.

Tables

  1992-1-6


1992-1-7-1


1992-1-7-2

1992-1-7-3

 
Website designed and maintained by DeltaCAS