The effect of Benzylisothfocyanate
on epithelial changes
induced by trauma and DMBA in the hamster tongue
A.M. AlDosari, BDS, MSD, PhD*, A.H. Kafrawy, BDS, MSD;**
S.M. Standish, DDS, MSD**
* King Saud University, College of Dentistry, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
** Indiana University, School of Dentistry, IN, USA.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of
benzylisothiocyanate (BIT) on the epithelial changes induced by trauma and
dimethylbenzanthracin (DMBA). Eighty male Syrian golden hamsters, five weeks
old, were randomly divided into four groups. Group I received repeated trauma
and mineral oil painting to the middle third of the right lateral border of the
tongue. Group II was traumatized in the same way as Group I and received
painting of the wound with BIT. Group III received similar trauma and painting
of the wound with DMBA. Group IV received trauma plus DMBA and BIT painting in
alternate dose.
Gross findings showed reduction in the development of persistent
ulcers and papillary lesions in the animals that received BIT painting.
Microscopic examination revealed epithelial changes ranging from mild dysplasia
to invasive carcinoma in all animals. In Groups II and IV, fewer animals showed
these changes, and the carcinomas seen in the two groups tended to be well
differentiated when compared to the others.The results indicated that BIT
retarded the development of neoplastic changes induced by trauma or trauma plus
DMBA.
For many years chewing sticks were used as a natural tooth
brush in different parts of the world especially in Islamic countries.1,2 Many studies have been
published about such natural toothbrush and its importance in oral health. Most
of these studies concerned the anticariogenic effect of the different types of
chewing sticks and their role in reducing cariogenic bacteria and limiting
inflammatory changes in the oral soft tissue.3-7
Some investigators have pointed out that some chewing
sticks like Dialium guiveenes, Diospyros tricolor, Fagara zanthoxyloides,
Garcinia kola, Massularia and Rhus glabra have anticarcinogenic activity.7-8 Recent studies have shown
the presence of benzylisothiocyanate (BIT) in the roots of Saivadora
persica, the most popular chewing stick in Saudi Arabia.9 BIT is classified as one of
the chemo-preventive agents that are thought to prevent carcinogenic and other
genotoxic compounds from reaching or reacting with the target sites on the
treated tissues.10 BIT and closely related compounds, such as
phenethylisothio- cyanate and benzylthiocyanate, are found naturally in cruciferous
vegetables like cabbage, brussels sprouts, broccoli, and cauliflower.11,12
Wattenberg13 reported that the systemic admin istration of
BIT to Sprague-Dawley rats which were exposed to dimethylbenzanthracin (DMBA)
resulted in a lower incidence of mammary neop lasms and a decrease in the
average number of tumors per animal. In another study, the addition of BIT to a
diet containing benzo (a)pyrene inhi bited carcinogenesis of the mouse's
fores-tomach.14
A search of the dental literature did not reveal any
previous research on the effect of BIT on the tissues of the oral cavity. The
present study was designed to test the effect of BIT on epithelial changes
induced in the tongue of hamsters by repeated trauma and DMBA application.
For many years chewing sticks were used as a natural tooth
brush in different parts of the world especially in Islamic countries.1,2 Many studies have been
published about such natural toothbrush and its importance in oral health. Most
of these studies concerned the anticariogenic effect of the different types of
chewing sticks and their role in reducing cariogenic bacteria and limiting
inflammatory changes in the oral soft tissue.3-7
Some investigators have pointed out that some chewing
sticks like Dialium guiveenes, Diospyros tricolor, Fagara zanthoxyloides,
Garcinia kola, Massularia and Rhus glabra have anticarcinogenic activity.7-8 Recent studies have shown
the presence of benzylisothiocyanate (BIT) in the roots of Saivadora
persica, the most popular chewing stick in Saudi Arabia.9 BIT is classified as one of
the chemo-preventive agents that are thought to prevent carcinogenic and other
genotoxic compounds from reaching or reacting with the target sites on the
treated tissues.10 BIT and closely related compounds, such as
phenethylisothio- cyanate and benzylthiocyanate, are found naturally in cruciferous
vegetables like cabbage, brussels sprouts, broccoli, and cauliflower.11,12
Wattenberg13 reported that the systemic admin istration of
BIT to Sprague-Dawley rats which were exposed to dimethylbenzanthracin (DMBA)
resulted in a lower incidence of mammary neop lasms and a decrease in the
average number of tumors per animal. In another study, the addition of BIT to a
diet containing benzo (a)pyrene inhi bited carcinogenesis of the mouse's
fores-tomach.14
A search of the dental literature did not reveal any
previous research on the effect of BIT on the tissues of the oral cavity. The
present study was designed to test the effect of BIT on epithelial changes
induced in the tongue of hamsters by repeated trauma and DMBA application.
Eighty male Syrian golden hamsters, five weeks old, were
used. They were caged individually, weighed weekly, and fed rat chow and water
ad libitum. They were divided into four equal groups as follows:
Group I: Animals in this group were traumatized at the middle third of the
right lateral border of the tongue three times a week with a barbed broach. The
traumatized part, as well as the middle third of the lateral border of the left
side the tongue, was then painted with mineral oil.
Group II: In this group,
the animals were traumatized as in Group I, and received painting of the wound and
the middle third of the lateral border of the left side of the tongue with BIT*
in mineral oil vehicle.
Group III: The middle third of the lateral border of the right side
of the tongue was traumatized with barbed broach followed by a painting with
DMBA** three times a week.
Group IV: Animals of this group were traumatized in the same way as group
III. The traumatized area was painted with BIT and DMBA three times a week in
alternate dose. DMBA was applied 48 hours before the application of BIT
BIT was dissolved in heavy mineral oil at a concentration
of 50 mg of BIT per 1 ml of mineral oil. DMBA was dissolved in a heavy mineral
oil to a final concentration of 0.5% solution. Both chemical agents were
applied to the treated sites with a No. 4 camel's hair brush. The solution was
in contact with area of application for at least five seconds. All precautions
were followed while handling the biohazardous materials, including the wearing
of disposable gloves, masks, and laboratory coats.
Prior to traumatization, the animals were sedated by
intramuscular injection of xylazine 20 mg/ml at a dose of 0.6 mg (0.03 ml)/100
g body weight. The injections were given in the thigh, alternating sides at
successive injections. Following induction of surgical anesthesia, the hamster
tongue was pulled forward with a pair of pincers. The tips of the pincers were
covered with rubber tubing to minimize non-experimental trauma to the tongue.
The tongues were rotated to the left side so that the middle third of the right
lateral border became horizontally positioned. A barbed broach was used to
abrade the tongue by passing it several times in parallel strokes on the mucosa
until the epithelium was visually damaged and/or cutting wounds were noted
The tongues were observed every other day throughout the
experiment for gross changes, and selected examples were photographed. After 12
weeks of the first treatment, ten of the 20 hamsters in each group were
randomly selected for sacrifice by C02 inhalation and opening of the thoracic cavity
to assure death. Each animal was dissected, and the tongues were removed for
microscopic examination. Treatment of the remaining 10 animals was continued
for another 12 weeks. Gross tissue changes were periodically observed and
recorded. At the end of the 24th week, all remaining animals were sacrificed
and the tongues were removed for microscopic examination.
The histologic criteria evaluated in this study included
those changes described as disturbances in polarity, drop-shaped rete ridges,
polymorphism, hyperchromatism, basal cell hyperplasia, alteration in the
nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio, increased mitoses, and intraepithelial
keratinization. The epithelial alterations from normal were divided into three
main types: dysplasia, carcinoma-in-situ, and invasive carcinoma. Dysplasia,
defined as alteration of development, was classified as mild, moderate or
severe, depending on the degree of the above mentioned changes.
Carcinoma-in-situ indicated a dyspiastic "top to bottom" change, with the
basement membrane still intact. In cases where the basement membrane was
disrupted, a diagnosis of invasive carcinoma was assigned.
During both study periods, all animals were observed
before each treatment for changes at the treated sites or adjacent areas.
Changes seen grossly were recorded according to one or more of the following
categories:
-
Leukoplakia: White patches occurring at the treatment site which
might be removed totally or partly by scratching. Such changes were quite
prominent in Groups I and III.
-
Persistent Ulcers: Lesions at the treatment sites which failed to
show signs of healing at the time of examination. These changes were noted more
frequently in Groups I and III, whereas they were seen in only one animal of
Group II and two animals of Group IV.
-
Papillary Lesions: Small, sessile or pedunculated growths varying
in size from 1 mm to 3 mm in diameter, and easily scraped off during treatment.
All groups exhibited such changes, but they were less frequent in Group II.
-
Delayed Healing: Treated sites which failed to show complete
healing in comparison with the other animals. Animals with these changes tended
to bleed easily at subsequent treatment. Such changes were recorded only in
Groups II and IV.
Distribution of the gross findings
are summarized in Table 1 [Figs. 1,2]. Results of histological examination of
the tongues for all groups are summarized in Table 2. Some examples of such
changes are shown in Figures 3-5
Results were analyzed using the variance and subsequent
studentized range "q" tests for arcsine transformation of percentage data. No
significant differences were detected between the four groups in the
development of leukoplakia and papillary lesions during both study periods. A
significant difference in the development of persistent ulcers and delayed
healing was seen between Groups I and III, and Groups II and IV (P<0.05)
during the first study period. The differences were not significant during the
second part of the study.
Analysis of the microscopic changes with invasive
carcinoma indicated that the only significant difference between groups was
between Groups II and III during the first part of the study
(P<0.05). Comparing the study periods within each group showed a significant
difference in Group I (P<O.05). No significant differences could be detected
within the other groups.
Many studies have investigated the role of carcinogenic
agents in the development of lingual neoplastic changes in animals.15-22 The findings in relation to
chronic trauma as a possible cause for these changes are not consistent in all
studies. Fujita et al18 reported that no tumors developed in 10
hamsters which received scratching alone. Marefat and Shklar15 found that after 15-16
weeks of traumatizing the middle third of the lateral border of the tongue, the
10 hamsters in their study developed hyperkeratosis and areas of dysplasia. Yin23 reported that after 12
weeks, three of 10 animals exhibited severe dysplasia, four carcinoma-in-situ,
and three had invasive carcinoma. After 24 weeks, two animals showed mild to
moderate dysplasia, four had severe dysplasia, and three had invasive
carcinoma. In this study, of the 10 hamsters which had been traumatized and
received applications of mineral oil for 12 weeks, one developed mild to
moderate dysplasia, one developed severe dysplasia, and eight developed
invasive carcinoma. After 24 weeks, all animals had invasive carcinoma.
These variations could be attributed to more than one
variable. The strain of the animals may play a role, and it has been shown that
inbred Syrian hamsters are highly susceptible to carcinogens.24,25 The degree of trauma may
have an effect; it has been reported that different intensities of skin
irritation caused different degrees of epidermal proliferation.26 Furthermore, in the present
study the traumatized sites were painted with heavy mineral oil after each
treatment that may have contributed to the high incidence of invasive carcinoma.
None of the previous studies applied heavy mineral oil at the site of trauma.
Experiments in which the use of DMBA was combined with
trauma have produced varied results depending on the type of dissolving
solution. A reduction in the activity of DMBA was reported when heavy mineral
oil was used as a vehicle.15 In 1973, Fujita and associates18 reported the development of
lingual carcinoma in all animals which were treated with both trauma and DMBA
in acetone for 13 to 25 weeks. Marefat and Shklar15 investigated
the effect of trauma combined with DMBA dissolved in two different vehicles. In
hamsters which received DMBA in heavy mineral oil for 15-16 weeks, only one
developed carcinoma-in-situ; the remaining animals showed hyperkeratosis and
dysplasia. All animals in the other group which were treated with DMBA in
acetone developed early carcinoma by 12-13 weeks, and the lesions became
advanced by 15-16 weeks. Yin23 used heavy mineral oil as the vehicle for DMBA
and found that within 12 weeks and out of nine animals, two developed severe
dysplasia, five developed carcinoma-in-situ, and two developed invasive
carcinoma. After 24 weeks, three hamsters showed severe dysplasia, two showed
carcinoma-in-situ, and five showed invasive carcinoma.
The microscopic findings in the present study showed that
all animals, in both study periods, developed invasive carcinoma. This result
agrees with the findings of both Fujita et al18 and Marefat and Shklar15 when they used DMBA in
acetone. Thus, a similarity is apparent between the action of DMBA in this
study and in those studies in which it was dissolved in acetone. This
observation raises an important question concerning the method by which the
DMBA is dissolved in the heavy mineral oil. The earlier studies gave no details
on this matter. In the present investigation, the temperature of the heavy
mineral oil was raised gradually while stirring until the solution became
clear. Also, supporting the view that the activity of DMBA in heavy mineral oil
in the present study was comparable to its activity in acetone, was the
appearance of neoplasms at untreated sites in seven of the 18 treated animals,
one in the floor of the mouth and six in the cheek. This is similar to what was
reported by Eveson and MacDonald21 when 12 out of 20 animals developed carcinomas
outside the treated area. Fujita and associates19 also noted the development of large carcinomas
at untreated sites in some of their experimental animals.
In the oral cavity, few compounds with chemop-reventive
action have been tried. Shklar and Marefat27 reported that the systemic administration of
13-cis-retinoic acid significantly delayed the development of lingual tumors
both grossly and microscopically. A similar result was obtained with the DMBA
carcinogenesis in hamster buccal pouch.28 Vitamin E inhibition of hamster buccal pouch
carcinogenesis has been reported.29 In one study, both selenium and
13-cis-retinoic acid were used, and the combined inhibitory effect was not
greater than with retinoic acid alone.30
In the present study, the gross findings indicated that
animals receiving topical application of BIT tended to show lower incidence of
persistent ulcers and papillary lesions, but at the same time presented another
feature which was referred to as delayed healing. During both periods of the
study, only three animals painted with BIT showed persistent ulcers. This
decrease in persistent ulcer formation could be related to the reported
antibiotic effect of BIT.31 The role of BIT in the development of delayed
healing is not clear. Delayed healing with BIT may be related to a process of
interfering with normal keratinization of the traumatized sites. This
interference could explain the relatively lower number and small size of white
patches in this group of animals. This observation is similar to the clinical
findings of Shah and associates32 in treating patients with oral leukoplakia. In
their study, patients were instructed to keep lozenges of 13-cis-retinoic acid
in their mouths and allow them to dissolve slowly. In some patients, the
initial response was thinning of the leukoplakia with reduction in the whitish
surface, leaving a reddish, velvety epithelium which eventually assumed the
color and texture of the normal adjacent mucosa.
Microscopic examination of the tongues of animals which
received trauma and BIT painting indicated that after 12 weeks one of 10
animals developed mild to moderate dysplasia, two severe dysplasia, one
carcinoma-in-situ, and six invasive carcinoma. After 24 weeks, one showed mild
to moderate dysplasia and nine developed invasive carcinoma. Of the animals
which received trauma, BIT and DMBA, one developed carcinoma-in-situ and nine
invasive carcinoma during the first study period. In the second period of the
study, two showed carcinoma-in-situ and six invasive carcinoma. The carcinomas
in both groups tend to be more well-differentiated histologically and less
invasive than those in the other two groups, especially during the first part
of the study. These findings are similar to the reported results with some
other chemopreventive agents in retarding the development of induced carcinoma.27,28,30
The exact mechanism by which BIT and related compounds act
in reducing the neoplastic changes at the treated sites is not clear. It might
produce its protective effect by interfering with the metabolism of carcinogens
through activation of DT-diaphorase and glutathione transferase, which have an
important role in detoxification and conjugation of these agents.33-35
- Elvin-Lewis M. Plants used for teeth cleaning throughout the
world. J Prevent Dent 1980;6:61 -70.
-
Lewis WH.
Plants used as chewing sticks. J Prevent Dent 1980;6:71-3.
-
Elvin-Lewis
M, Kendell K, Lewis WH, Harwood M. Anti-cariogenic potential of chewing sticks.
J Dent Res 1974;53:277.
-
Lewis WH,
Elvin-Lewis M. Medical botany. New
York:Wi!ey and Sons, 1977: 230-44.
-
Peach MJ.
Anions, phosphate, iodine, fluoride and other anions. In: pharmacological basis
of therapeutics. Goodman LS and Gilman A eds. New York:McMillan and Co, 1975:798-808.
-
Buadu CY,
Borkaye-Yiadom AE. The antibacterial activity of some Ghanian chewing sticks. Ghana Pharma J
1973;1:150.
-
Mohammad
S, Mohammad A. Significance of chewing sticks (miswak) in oral hygiene from a
pharmacological viewpoint. J Pakistan
Med Assoc 1981; 31(4): 89-95.
-
Thomas RH.
Naturally occurring quinones. 2nd ed. New
York:Academic Press, 1971:229.
-
Ezmirly ST, El-Nars MMS. Isolation of glucotropaelin from Safvadora persica.
J Chem Soc Pak 1981 ;3(1):9-12.
-
Wattenberg
LW. Inhibition of carcinogenic effects of polycyclic hydrocarbons by
benzylisothiocyanate and related compounds. J Nat'l Cancer Inst 1977;58:395-8.
-
Kjaer A.
Naturally occurring isothiocyanate and their parent glycosides. In : N.
Kharasched, Chemistry of organic sulfur compounds, Vol 1. Elmsford, NY:Pergamon
Press, 1961:409-20.
-
1 2. Virtanen A. Some organic sulfur compounds in vegetables and
fodder plants and their significance in human nutrition. Agnew Chem (Engl)
1962;1:299-306.
-
Wattenberg
LW. Inhibition of carcinogenic effects of polycyclic hydrocarbons by
benzylisothiocyanate and related compounds. J Nat'l Cancer Inst 1977;58:395-8.
-
Wattenberg
LW. Inhibition of carcinogen-induced neoplasia by sodium cyanate,
tertbutylisocyanate, and benzyl isothiocyanate administered subsequent to
carcinogen exposure. Cancer Res 1981;41:2991-4.
-
Marefat P,
Shklar G. Experimental production of lingual leukoplakia and carcinoma. Oral
Surg 1977;44:578-86.
-
Dachi SF.
Experimental production of carcinomas of the hamster tongue. J Dent Res
1967,-46:1480.
-
Giunta J,
Shklar G. Studies on tongue carcinogenesis in rats using DMBA with and without
cyanoacrylate adhesive. Arch Oral Biol 1972;17:617-22.
-
Fujita K,
Kaku T, Sasaki M, OnoeT. Experimental production of lingual carcinomas in
hamsters by local application of 9,10-dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene. J Dent Res
1973;52:327-32.
-
Fujita K,
Kaku T, Sasaki M, Onoe T. Experimental production of lingual carcinomas in
hamsters: tumor characteristics and site formation, J Dent Res
1973;52:1176-85.
-
Marefat
MP, Shkfar G. Lingual carcinogenesis in an inbred strain of hamsters. J Oral
Pathol 1978;7:38.
-
W,
MacDonald DG. Hamster tongue carcinogenesis. I. Characteristics of the
experimental model. J Oral Pathol 1981;10:322-31.
-
Maeda H,
Kameyam Y. Effect of excisional wounding on DMBA-induced hamster tongue
carcinogenesis. J Oral Pathol 1986;15:21-7.
-
Yin SR.
Induction of epithelial lesions on the hamster tongue by trauma and application
of alcohol and DMBA. Master's Thesis, Indiana University School of Dentistry,
1985.
-
Marefat
MP. The effect of the short dose schedule of DMBA application in inducing
lingual neoplasia in inbred Syrian hamsters. J Oral Pathol 1985;14:383-9.
-
Bernfeld
P, Homburger F, Russfield AB. Strain differences in the response of inbred
Syrian hamsters to cigarette smoke inhalation. J Nat'l Cancer Inst
1974;53:1141-57.
-
Argyris
TS, Slaga TJ. Promotion of carcinomas by repeated abrasion in initiated skin of
mice. Cancer Res 1981;41:5193-5.
-
Shklar G,
Marefat P, Kornhauser A, Trickier DP, Wallace KD. Retinoid inhibition of
lingual carcinogenesis. Oral Surg 1980;49:325-32.
-
Shklar G,
Schwartz J, Grau D, Truckler DP, Wallace KD. Inhibition of hamster buccal pouch
carcinogenesis by 13-cis-retinoic acid. Oral Surg 1980;50:45-52.
-
Weerapradist
W, Shklar G. Vitamin E inhibition of hamster buccal pouch carcinogenesis. Oral
Surg 1982;54;304-12.
-
Goodwin WJ
Jr, Huijing F, Bordash GD, Altman N. Inhibition of hamster tongue carcinogenesis
by selenium and retinoic acid. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1986;95:162-6.
-
Pulverer
G. Allyl isothiocyanate: a new broad spectrum anbtibiotic from nasturtium.
German Med Monthly 1969;14:27-30.
-
Shah JP,
Strong EW, DeCosse JJ, Itri L, Sellers P. Effects of retinoids on oral
leukoplakia. Am J Surg 1983;146:466-70.
-
Benson AM,
Barretto PB. Effects of disulfiram, diethyl-dithiocarbamate, bisethylxenthogen,
and benzyl isothiocyanate on glutathione transferase activity in mouse organs.
Cancer Res 1985;45:4219-23.
-
Benson AM,
Barretto PB, Stanley JS. Induction of DT-diaphorase by anti- carcinogenic
sulfur compounds in mice. J Nat'l Cancer Inst 1986;76:467-73.
-
Benson AM,
Hunkeller MJ, Talalay P. Increase of NAD(P)H: quinone reductase by dietary
antioxidants: possible role in protection against carcinogenesis and toxicity.
Proc Natl Acad Sci 1980;77:5216-20.
|