• JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator

ISSN (Print) 1013-9052
EISSN 1658-3558

The Saudi Dental Journal,
P.O. Box 52500,
Riyadh 11563,
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Tel.
966-1-467-7328
Fax.
933-1-467-7308 /
966-1-467-7534
Email
saudidj@ksu.edu.sa


Clinical assessment of the most common TMJ imaging

modalities including Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

 

Khalid M. Ai-Balkhi, BDS, MS,*;
Joseph A. Catania, DDS, MPH**;
Ross H. Tallents, DDS***

* Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, King Saud University, College of Dentistry, P.O. Box, 60169, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia.
** Department of Orthodontics, Eastman Dental Center, Rochester, New York
*** Eastman Dental Center, Rochester, New York


Review of Literature

 

An accurate diagnosis of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) status requires a thorough knowledge of the normal and abnormal anatomy of the joint as well as the mechanics of its movement [Figs, la and b]. The TMJ is a synovial joint consisting of the mandibular condyle, glenoid fossa and articular eminence soft tissue disc,1,2 and posterior attachment (bilaminar zone)3'4- The disc, also termed a meniscus, is a biconcave structure consisting mainly of dense fibrous tissue interposed between the condyle and the glenoid fossa. Posteriorly, the disc is attached by the bilaminar zone, a fibroelastic tissue, rich in nerves and vessels.3'4 The medial and lateral attachments anchor the disc to the condylar poles. Anteriorly, the disc fuses with the fibrous joint capsule and anterio-medially it attaches to the superior belly of the lateral pterygoid muscle. The disc and its attachments divide the joint into upper and lower joint spaces. These joint spaces, with the exception of the disc surfaces are lined by synovial tissue. Surrounding the joint is a tough, fibrous capsule reinforced laterally by the lateral ligament.3
Normal jaw opening depends on the coordinated activity of the hard and soft tissues of the joint as well as the muscles of mastication.3,5,6 As the condyle moves anteriorly or posteriorly, the disc maintains its position superiorly on the condyle [Figs. 1a and b]. Any disturbance of this complex mechanism of jaw movement may give rise to TMJ pain and dysfunction.5
Two of the more common abnormalities of this articular mechanism are internal disc derangements and degenerative arthritis.5,7-12 The most common form of disc derangement is the anteriorly displaced disc [Figs. 2a and 3a]. With this abnormality, the disc is located anterior or anterio-medialiy to the condylar head. Sometimes the anterior displaced disc will "reduce" or return to its position over the condyle on jaw opening and produce an audible clicking sound [Fig. 2b].5'7-17 On closure, the disc slips off the condyle to an anterior position producing a closing or reciprocal click. This condition is referred to disc displacement with reduction [Figs. 2a and b]. Clinically, one can often note deviation of the jaw to the affected side prior to the clicking sound.
In some cases, the disc may maintain its anterior position regardless of the degree of jaw opening [Figs. 3a and b).5,77 This situation is classified as disc displacement without reduction. Clinically, these patients may or may not have limitation of movement or deviation of the jaw. In an early meniscal displacement without reduction, translation is usually limited and there is a persistent deviation of the jaw on opening to the affected side. In patients with chronic displacement, but without reduction, there may be no limitation of translation and no deviation of the lower jaw on opening.
Clinical examination alone including evaluation of joint noise and degree of translation may lead to an erroneous diagnosis. Not all patients with audible clicking have disc displacement with reduction.16-17 Also, limitation of translation may not indicate an intra-articular disturbance. 18 Complete examination of the TMJ requires imaging of both the hard and soft tissues of the joint. Due to the complexity of the joint, three-dimensional evaluation is necessary to accurately assess joint form and function. Another consideration in imaging the TMJ is its location at the base of the skull with superimpositions of other bony structures. When evaluation is done with plain films, superim-position of other bony structures limits both the diagnostic accuracy and number of useful radiographic views.
Epidemiological surveys demonstrate that signs and symptoms of temporo-mandibular joint (TMJ) dysfunction are common in the adult population.19'20 Clinical joint sounds have been found in up to 28% of adults, and are considered a common sign of TMJ dysfunction, which is often related to disc displacement.21
The aim of this clinical assessment is to present, as well as to clinically evaluate, current modalities used in the diagnosis of internal derangements of the temporomandibular joints.

Clinical Evaluation of the Imaging Techniques:


TMJ imaging provides information about the status and function of the joint that helps in establishing a definitive diagnosis. The most common techniques for the TMJ imaging are the transcranial radiography, tomography, arthrography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging. However, panoramic radiographs with specific setting for TMJ imaging are used by some dental clinicians for TMJ evaluation.


1.    Panoramic Radiographs


Conventional panoramic radiography has been used as a screening tool for the entire maxillo-man- dibular region, including the TMJ [Fig. 4a]. However, conventional panoramic views for TMJ evaluation are subjected to distortions and limitations.22-25 Several techniques involving changing the usual positioning of the patient were recommended so as to provide for a more specific panoramic radiograph of the TMJ area.24'26-28 Separate images are taken of the left and right sides with two to four projections taken on one film for open and closed TMJ positions. These provide clearer views of the bony TMJ area allowing for bilateral evlauation and comparison of the general morphology of the bony condyles as well as their relative translation. Disadvantages of this technique are inability to determine the exact condylar fossa relationship, and inability to provide diagnostic informations of the position and the status of the disc [Fig. 4b].


2.    Transcranial Radiographs and Tomography


Even though these two techniques utilize two different technical radiographical concepts, they are considered first among the means of studying TMJ anatomy. Transcranial radiography provides a basic screening image of the TMJ that is relatively easy to use and inexpensive since it could be produced by utilizing the standard dental radiographic equipment with minor modifications.29 It provides gross information concerning the anteroposterior relationship of the condyle in the fossa or in translation. However, transcranial films have been the subject of much controversy because they can be readily misinterpreted or over interpreted. The difficulty arises from distortion of the osseous structures, superimposition of other anatomic structures, and inability to visualize anything but the lateral third of the condyle and articular fossa. In addition, transcranial radiographs fail to show definite changes in the soft tissue disc or the disc condyle relationship.

TMJ tomography exceeds the capacity of the transcranial radiography in providing information about surface changes of the condyle, fossa and eminence in the medio-lateral dimensions.30'31 It provides a better description of the anteroposterior position of the condyle in the fossa by providing a radiographic image of the planes passing through the lateral, central, and medial aspects of the TMJ. However, like the transcranial radiography, soft tissue disc changes can not be determined by tomography [Figs. 5a & bj.

3.    Arthrography and videofluoroscopy


Arthrography is basically tomography in addition to injecting a radiopaque dye into a single joint space or in both upper and lower joint spaces.21'32 Following the dye injection and videofluoroscopy, specialized lateral arthrograms can be performed with the jaw closed and open. Most information is obtained from the closed-mouth tomographic cuts, because these images demonstrate specific morphologic changes within the meniscus and the relative position of the disc to the condyle. An open-mouth view is important in demonstrating the presence or absence of meniscus reduction [Figs. 6a-fl. Arthrography with the use of videofluoroscopy is vitally important for evaluating disc derangements of the TMJ.6,9,31,32,33-38 Such corn- bined technique provides dynamic functional information of the pathologic meniscus function during translation, which is not available with any of the other imaging techniques. It is considered as the most or the only effective imaging modality in depicting soft tissue-disc-perforations. Therefore, its advantages are its ability to evaluate both the soft tissue disc and the bony condyle with accuracy, depicts soft tissue-disc perforations and provides dynamic visualization. However, its disadvantages include (1) being an invasive radiographic procedure which may produce moderate patient discomfort, (2) the need for radiology specialist with fluoroscopic viewing, (3) using ionizing radiations and, (4) inability to perform in patients with TMJ ankylosis and/or fibrosis.


4.    Computed Tomography (CT)


Computed tomography [Fig.7] is a useful and versatile imaging technique. It was introduced with the advantages of being non-invasive with the ability to evaluate hard tissues as well as soft tissues. CT and its 3D display - three dimensional-imaging are most useful in the initial imaging of conditions such as congenital anomalies, degenerative bony changes, and fractures due to the high spatial resolutions of bony structure.39-42 The negative aspects of CT are the involvement of ionizing radiation, lack of dynamic visualization, and most important is its substandard resolution of the soft tissue structures of the TMJ.43 Accordingly, at present, CT may not be the ideal imaging modality in the diagnosis of internal derangement of the TMJ.


5.    Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)


MRI is the most recent, versatile, and exciting technology in the field of medical imaging44-48 due to its superior resolution of both soft tissues as well as hard tissues of the temporomandibular joint [Figs.8a and bj. It is considered as the imaging of choice in the diagnosis of TMJ internal derangement; both displacements with reduction [Figs. 9a and b] and without reduction [Figs. 10a and b], as well as degenerative condylar conditions with high degree of accuracy [Fig. 11 ] ,48"52 The chief advantages of MRI are the absence of ionizing radiation, non-invasive, superior soft tissue resolution, ability of examination by the technician, and multiplaner cross-sectional imaging capability. MRI image slices could be obtained in any plane or depth, which allows for simultaneous evaluation of the joint's soft and hard tissue relationship in both sagittal, as well as coronal planes resulting in a more precise and accurate diagnosis in all three planes. Negative aspects include high cost of examination, may not be widely available, inability to accurately depict soft tissue perforations, and lack of dynamic visualization. With time and further improvements that is taking place in the field of MRI technology, imaging time and expenses may be reduced and development of a true cinematic MRI, color MR! and three-dimensional capabilities as well as the ability to accurately depict soft tissue perforation are expected.

The basic difference between MRI and other conventional radiography lies in that the latter, as well as CT imaging, are based on X-rays (ionizing radiation), while MRI relies on the property of nuclei with an odd number of protons, neutrons, or both, to behave as magnets. Hydrogen, being the most abundant element in the body in the form of water, and being the most sensitive of the stable nuclei to a magnetic field, is ideally suited for MRI. The axes of these nuclei, when subjected to a strong magnetic field align within the field. Analogous to photographic flash, radiowaves of a specific frequency, termed as the "resonant frequency", may be used to excite these nuclei out of alignment with the magnetic field. When the radiowave is turned off, the nuclei tend to realign with the magnetic field releasing some of the energy absorbed by the incident radiowave. A signal is released in the form of a radiowave of the same frequency as the incident radiowave. The emitted radiowave or signal is picked up by the receiver coils and computer processed to create the final MR image. It follows then that tissues high in water and fat, such as bone marrow, appear bright on the MRI while tissues with very low water content, such as bone cortex, appears dark. Muscles and brain tissue, being intermediate in water density, have a grayish color. For a more thorough discussion and understanding of MR physics and applications, one may read references 44 to 52.


Conclusions

 

  1. Accurate diagnosis of the internal derangements of TMJ requires in-depth knowledge ofthe anatomical, physiological, and pathophysiological  status of the joint.
  2. The complex nature of temporomandibular joint in regards to its anatomical location, complex coordinated function and the integral role of the disc and its attachments, necessitates a mean of evaluating the soft tissue of the joint as well as the bony structures.
  3. Imaging of the TMJ is an important adjunct to the case history and a thorough clinical examination.
  4. Imaging of the TMj is not designed to be under­taken by the average general practitioner with the exception of the panoramic radiographs, and to some extent transcranial radiographs. A radiology specialist with experience in each respective modality should technically perform and interpret the images.
  5. The role of the average general practitioner is to have a background about the diagnostic capabilities of each imaging modality, and, he/ she may needs to have the basic knowledge of how each imaging modality is interpreted.

References

 

  1. Sicher H. Functional anatomy of the temporomandibular joint. In Sarnat BG (ed). The temporomandibular joint. 2nd ed. Springfield, ILCC Thomas, 1964:28-58.
  2. DuBrul EL. The craniomandibular articulation. In Sicher's Oral Anatomy. 7th ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby Co, 1980:4.
  3. Griffin CJ, Hawthorn R, Harris R. Anatomy and histology of the human temporomandibular joint. Monogr Oral Sci 1975;4:1-26.
  4. Scapino RP. Histopathology associated with malposition of the human temporomandibular joint disc. Oral Surg 1983;55:382-97.
  5. Wilkes CH. Arthrography of the temporomandibular joint in patients with TMJ pain dysfunction syndrome. Minn Med 1978;61:645-52.
  6. McNamara JA, Jr. The independent functions of the two heads of the lateral pterygoid muscle. Am J Anat 1973;138:197-205.
  7. Katzberg RW, Dolwick MF, Helms CA, et al. Arthroto­mography of the temporomandibular joint. Am J Roentgenol 1980;134:995-1003.
  8. Farrar WFB, McCarthy WL, Jr. Inferior joint space arthrography and characteristics of condylar paths in internal derangements of the TMJ. J Prosthet Dent 1979; 41:548-55.
  9. Katzberg RW, Dolwick MF, Bales DJ, Helms CA. Arthrotomography of the temporomandibular joint: New technique and preliminary observations. Am J Roentgenol 1979;132:949-55.
  10. Katzberg RW, Dolwick MF, Helms CA, et al. Arthrotomography of the temporomandibular joint. Am J Roentgenol 1980;134:995-1003.
  11. Katzberg RW, Keith DA, Guralnick WC, et ai. Internal derangements and arthritis of the temporomandibular joint. Radiol 1983;146: 107-12.
  12. Norgaard F. Temporomandibular arthrography. Thesis, Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1947.
  13. Dolwick MF. The temporomandibular joint: normal and abnormal anatomy. In: internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint. Helms CA, Katzberg RW, Dolwick MS(eds). San Francisco: Radiol Res Educ Found, 1983:1-14.
  14. Manzione JV, Katzbery RW, Brodsky GL, et ai. Internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint: II. Diagnosis by direct sagittal computed tomography. Radiol 1984;150:111-5.
  15. MancoLG, Messing SG, BusinoLJ, FasuloCP, Sordill WC. Internal derange- ments of the temporomandibular joint evaluated with direct sagittal CT: a prospective sturdy. Radiol 1985;157:407-12.
  16. Bronstein SL, Tomasetti BJ, Ryan DE, Internal derangements of the tempore- mandibular joint: correlation of arthrography with surgical findings. I Oral Surg 1981;39:572-84.
  17. Isberg-Holm AM, Westesson PL. Movement of disc and condyle in temporomandibufar joints with and without clicking: a high-speed cinematographic and dissection study on autopsy specimens. Acta Odontol Scand 1982;40:165-77.
  18. Miller TL, Katzberg RW, Tallents RH, Bessette RW, Hayakawa K. Temporo- mandibular joint clicking with non-reducing anterior displacement of the meniscus. Radiol 1985;154:121-4.
  19. Roberts CA, Tallents RH, Espelancl MA, Handelman SL, Katzberg RW. Mandibular range of motion versus arthrography diagnosis of the temporomandibular joint. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1985;60:244-51.
  20. Ingervall B, Mohlin B, Thilander B. Prevalence of symptoms of functional disturbances of the masticatory system in Swedish men. J Oral Rehabil 1980;7:185-97.
  21. Solberg WK, Woo MW, Houston JB. Prevalence of manibular dysfunction in young adults. J Am Dent Assoc 1979;98:25-34.
  22. Roberts CA, Tallents RH, Katzberg RW, et al. Clinical arthrography evaluation of the temporo- mandibular joint sounds. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986;62(4):373-6.
  23. UpdegraveW. The roie of panoramic radiography in diagnosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1966;22:49-57.
  24. Weiander U, McDavid W, Tronje G. Theory of rotational panoramic radiography. !n: Principles and practice of panoramic radiography. O. Langland, R. Langlais and C. Morris eds. Philadephia:WB Saunders Co, 1982:37-54.
  25. Manson-Hing LR. Advances in dental pantomography: The GE 3000. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971;31:430-8.
  26. Langland O, Langlais R, Morris C. Principles and practice of panoramic radiography. Philadeiphia:WB Saunders Co, 1982:411-43.
  27. Updegrave W. Visualizing the mandibular ramus in panoramic radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Pathol 1971;31:422-29.
  28. Chilvarquer I, McDavid WD, Langlais, RP, et al. A new technique for imaging the TMJ with a panoramic X-ray machine. Part I. Description of the technique. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1988;65:626-31.
  29. Chilvarquer I, Prihoda T, McDavid WD, et al. A new technique for imaging the TM| with a panoramic X-ray machine. Part II. Positioning with the use of patient data. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1988;65:632-36.
  30. Kaplan A, Assael L. Temporomandibular disorders diagnosis and treatment. Philadelphia:WB Saunders Co, 1991:312-18.
  31. Stanson AW, Baker HL. Routine tomography of the temporomandibular joint. Radiol Clin North Am 1976;14:105-27.
  32. Blaschke DD, Solberg WK, Sanders B. Arthrography of the temporomandibular joint: review of current status. J Am Dent Assoc 1980;100:388-95.
  33. Schellhas KP, Wilkes CH.Omlie MR etal. The diagnosis of temporomandibular joint disease: two compartment arthrography and MR. Am J Roentgenol. 1988;9:579-88 and AJR 1988, 151(2): 341-50
  34. Helms CA, Katzberg RW, Dolwick MF, Bales DJ. Afthrotomographic diagnosis of meniscus perforations in the temporomandibular joint. BrJ Radiol 1980;53:283-5.
  35. Murphy WA. Arthrography of the temporomandibular joint. Radiol Clin North Am 1981;19:365-78.
  36. Bell KA, Walters PJ. Videofluoroscopy during arthrography of the temporo- mandibular joint. Radiol J983;147(3):879.
  37. Westesson PL, Rohlin M. Diagnostic accuracy of double contrast arthrotomography of temporomandibular joint: correlation with post mortem morphology. Am J Roentgenol 1984;143:655-60.
  38. Anderson QN, Katzburg RW. Pathologic evaluation of disk dysfunction and osseous abnormalities of the temporomandibular joint. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1985;43:947-51.
  39. Manzione JV, Seltzer SE, Katzberg RW, Hammerschiag SB, Chiango BF. Direct sagittal computed tomography of the temporomandibular joint. Am J Roentgenol 1983;140:165-67.
  40. Roberts D, Pettigrew J, Udupa J, Ram C. Three-dimen­sional imaging and display of the temporomandibular joint. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984;58:461-74.
  41. Roberts D, Pettigrew J, Ram C, Joseph PM. Radiologic technique used to evaluate the temporomandibular joint, II, computed tomography, three-dimensional imaging and nuclear magnetic resonance. Anesth Prog 1984;31:241-56.
  42. Kursunogiu S, Kaplan P, Resnick D, Sartoris DJ. Three-dimensional computed tomographic analysis of the normal temporomandibular joint. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986;44:257-9
  43. Dumas AL, Oaddab MB, Homayoun NH, McDonough J. A 3-dimensionaf developmental measurement of the tem­poromandibular joint. Cranio 1986; 4:22-35.
  44. Helms CA, Morrish RB Jr, Kircos LT. et al. Computed tomography of the meniscus of the temporoman- dibular joint: preliminary observations. Radiol 1982;145:719-22.
  45. Newton TH, Potts DG. Advanced imaging techniques. Modern Neuroradiol 1983;2;115-7.
  46. Crooks LE. Overview of NMR imaging techniques. In: Nuclear magnetic resonance in medicine, Kaufman L, Crooks LE, Margulis AR ed. New York and Tokyo: Igaku-Shoin, 1981:30-52.
  47. Harms SE, Wilk RM, Woiford LM, Chiles DC, Milan SB. The temporomandibular joint: MRI using surface coils. Radiol 1985;157:133-4.
  48. Schellhas KP, Wilkes CH, Fritts HM, Omlie MR, Heithoff KB, Jahan JA. Temporomandibular joint: MR imaging of internal derangements and post-operative changes. Am J Roentgenol 1988;150(2):381-9.
  49. Katzberg RW, Schenck JF, Roberts D et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint meniscus. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1985;59:332-5.
  50. Roberts D, Schenck J, Joseph P, eta!. Temporomandibular joint: magnetic resonance imaging. Radiol 1985;154(3):829-30.
  51. Katzberg RW, Bessette RW, Tallents RH, et al. Normal and abnormal temporomandibular joint: MR imaging with surface coil. Radiol 1986; 158(1 ):183-89.
  52. Manzione JV, Katzberg RW, Tallents RH, Macher D. Magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint. J Am Dent Assoc 1986; 11 3:398-402.
  53. Bradley W, Tosteson H. basic principles of NMR. In: Nuclear magnetic resonance in medicine. Kaufman L, Crooks LE, James AE Jr, Rolio FD, Price RR eds. New York and Tokyo:lgaku-Shoin, 1981.

Tables

  1992-3-120


1992-3-121-1


1992-3-121-2


1992-3-122-1


1992-3-122-2


1992-3-123-1


1992-3-123-2


1992-3-124-1


1992-3-124-2


1992-3-124-3


1992-3-125-1


1992-3-125-2


1992-3-125-3

1992-3-126

 
Website designed and maintained by DeltaCAS