What do patients really need to know about toothbrushes
and dental floss?
Khalid M. Al-Saif, BDS, MSD
College of Dentistry, King Saud University, P.O.Box 60169, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia.
A very common question usually asked by dental patients is what type of
toothbrush and dental floss they should use. A simplified and comprehensive
review of current literature on toothbrushes and dental floss as well as techniques
of brushing and flossing is presented. It is also emphasized that materials and
methods are only two factors of achieving good oral hygiene. The most important
factor is for the patients to apply routine practice of the technique chosen
The most important thing that the patient has to know is
to use toothbrushes and dental floss effectively and regularly. There is no
doubt that thoroughness of tooth-cleaning with daily brushing and flossing is
the best way to ensure the health of the patient's teeth and gums. Optimal oral
health is within everyone's capability if they think enough of themselves and
invest a few minutes each day in proper dental care. Patients should not wait
until their teeth or gums hurt and then seek dentists' help. Dentists and their
technology alone cannot save patients' teeth and gums from their own disregard
of basic health rules.
Toothbrushes
Design Characteristics
Toothbrushes are either manual or electrically powered
devices.1 A manual tooth- brush is made up of bristles,
a head, and a handle. Bristles are the most imporant part of the toothbrush and
are either artificial or natural in origin, A brush that is soft, round- ended,
or polished with artificial nylon bristles is recommended.2 Examples of this type of toothbrushes are GUM,
ORAL B, and REACH [Fig. I]. The homogeneity of the material, uniformity of
size, elasticity, resistance to fracture, and the ability to repel water and
food debris give the artificial bristles many advantages over the natural bristles.
However, natural bristles are seldom used in toothbrushes nowadays.2-3
A soft-bristled brush is more
effective in removing plaque with less harm to soft and hard tissues than a
brush with hard bristles because soft bristles are more flexible and thus can
reach subgingival and proximal areas. A hard-bristled brush may cause 3-6 times
more abrasion than soft brushes.2,4
Round-ended bristles are recommended because they have
been shown to cause 30% to 50% less soft tissue trauma than course-cut bristles.
The tips of course-cut bristles have sharp corners that reduce their cleaning
efficiency and increases damage to the oral tissue.1-2
The size and shape of a toothbrush head is one of the most
important parts of a toothbrush. A small head is recommended because it allows
the patient to reach into places in the mouth that would be inaccessible to a
large head toothbrush. The head of the electric toothbrush is usually smaller
than the manual and is removable.1 Wasserman5 reported that the ability of deep-grooved
design toothbrush to reduce plaque accumulation is superior to conventional
flat-surface toothbrush. However this superiority was limited to lower molar
area.
The toothbrush handle should be firm, resilient, and
resistant to fracture. It is very common that small brushes are recommended for
children. It should be considered that neuromuscular coordination in young
children is not yet fully developed. Therefore, brushes with large handles are
more suitable for them. Special patients with limited arm or finger movement
require modification of the handles such as enlarging or extending them [Fig.
2].6
Effectiveness
Toothbrushing removes plaque form the outer, inner, and
biting surfaces of the teeth. Hand and powered toothbrushes are not considered
effective for interdental plaque removal. No one specific type of toothbrush
has been found to be consistently more effective than another. That is because differences
in oral hygiene conditions and the manual ability among individuals may lead
to varying requirements for toothbrushes.1-2,5-6
Manual vs. Electric Toothbrushing
The powered toothbrushes appear to be helpful in improving
the oral health of physically or mentally handicapped individuals because these
devices require minimal hand motion and coordination skills.1 Some models are designed with each bristle
rotating individually and are effective plaque removers.9 Also, children may find electrical
toothbrushes more appealing and thus use them more often than manual
toothbrushes.3 However, there are limitations on the efficacy
of powered toothbrushes. The presence of crowding, tipping, or overlapping of
teeth and in patients with hyperactive tongue and small mouths may decrease the
ability of the electric brush to remove plaque.7-8
Safety
Toothbrushes should be replaced when they are worn or
frayed regardless of how long the brush has been in use [Fig. 3]. A worn
toothbrush can be a hazard because it cannot remove plaque, thus it is not
doing its job, and because bent bristles can injure the gums.10 Toothbrushes with hard and/or coarse-cut
bristles can cause damage to dental tissues. Fraleigh11, and Manhold et al12, found no
significant differences between powered and manual brushes in their potential
for stimulating gingival keratinization or for abrading mucosa and teeth.
Clinical assessment of patient toothbrushing is a good
preventive measure. Assessment should also include inspection of the patient's
toothbrush. This will help the clinician to detect any sign of abrasion or
gingival recession that may have resulted from improper brushing method. The
proper method then can be reinforced, thus maximizing the safety of
toothbrushing.1
The patient should look for the ADA's or other recognized dental associations
seal of approval before buying an electric toothbrush. The label approval
statement is as follows: "Acceptable as an effective cleaning device for use as
part of a program for good oral hygiene to supplement the regular professional
care required for oral health".
This approval shows that the product has met the ADA or other associations
requirements for electric safety, dental safety, and that there is clinical
evidence of cleaning efficiency.]
Toothbrushing Technique
Greene13 (1966)
grouped toothbrushing technique into the following categories based on the
direction of the brushing stroke: (1) vertical; (2) horizontal; (3) roll
technique; (4) vibrating technique; (5) circular technique; (6) physiological
technique; (7) scrub brush technique. Comparative studies of these different
methods have yielded conflicting results and each technique has it's own
protagonists.13
The ideal tooth brushing technique is the one that removes
plaque, food debris and stain, and stimulates the gingival tissues with the
least time and effort, and does not damage oral tissues. Since these criteria
cannot be met with any specific tooth brushing technique, it is necessary to
evaluate each individual condition in order to select the proper brushing
method. It appears that a short stroke of vibrating scrub technique, with the
bristles aimed at a 45° angle toward tooth apex, is the recommended method for
the general public.14 With this method, the
toothbrush can clean only one or two teeth at a time, and it will probably take
about three minutes of brushing to clean all the teeth adequately. Patients
finish the procedure by brushing their tongue to help remove bacteria and
freshen their breath.3
The chosen method should be demonstrated for the patient
and the patient has to practice it in the office until he or she develops a
reasonable efficiency in using it. Repeated supervised training sessions are
necessary for success. Furthermore, the ability of the patient to accomplish
effective tooth brushing should be evaluated as a part of the total oral
hygiene program.
The frequency of brushing depends on the effectiveness of
the patient in removing plaque. Generally, the patients need two thorough
brushings a day. However, the thoroughness of tooth cleaning is more important
than the specific method of tooth brushing and the frequency.
Dental Floss
Dental floss is available in various styles and sizes
[Fig. 4]. Generally, they consist of very small continuous multifilament
threads or tapes of either unwaxed or waxed synthetic fibers, usually nylon.15
Interproximal contact areas are different among
individuals because of variations in morphology and position of teeth, and
presence of dental restorations. Therefore, each individual's condition should
be evaluated before a specific type of dental floss is recommended.1
Patients with tight contact areas need thin unwaxed floss
that can be slipped easily between the contact areas, whereas in patients with
crowded teeth, heavy calculus deposits, or defective and overhanging
restorations, a bonded unwaxed floss or waxed floss is the dental floss of
choice because they do not fray as easily as unwaxed floss. Dental tape is
recommended when there is considerable interdental space resulting from
gingival recession and bone loss. Therefore, the patient has to know his
specific condition and why that certain type of dental floss was chosen for
him/her.1,3
Effectiveness
Dental floss has been shown to be effective in removing
plaque and food debris from interproximal areas, and in polishing these areas
as well. The effectiveness of flossing in maintaining oral hygiene was studied
by Mohammed and Monserrate.16 They stated that flossing is effective in
removing plaque in embrasure areas commonly missed by brushing. It also
massages the interdental papilla and aids in identifying the presence of calculus
deposits, overhanging restorations and/or carious lesions in the interproximal
area.18 Patients have to know that decay and
periodontal diseases often start between teeth where a toothbrush cannot reach.
With respect to the effectiveness of waxed or unwaxed
dental floss, no significant difference has been demonstrated.18,19 However, during flossing, unwaxed dental floss
can flatten out and cover more area than waxed floss. Furthermore, unwaxed
floss seems to remove more plaque due to the spreading of fine filaments which
trap and absorb plaque.15-16
Safety
Proper flossing is considered a safe procedure. However,
incorrect flossing which includes poor adaptation, improper floss activation,
or lack of a rest to prevent undue pressure may traumatize both hard and soft
tissues, and may also result in inadequate plaque removal. Laceration of
interdental papilla and cervical wear on proximal root surfaces are signs of
improper flossing.17
When using the spool flossing method,
attention should be made to leave spaces between wraps to avoid cutting off
blood circulation to the fingers. Clinicians should evaluate patients flossing
technique so that improper flossing can be corrected to maximize the safety.'
Technique of Flossing
There are two main flossing methods; the spool method and
the circle or loop method. The spool method is recommended for patients who
have acquired the required level of neuromuscular coordination.1
In this method, a piece of dental floss approximately
18-inch long is utilized. The patient should tightly wind most of the length of
floss around the middle finger whereas, the rest of floss is similarly wound
around the same finger of the opposite hand. The latter finger will take up the
floss as it is used. Then, the floss is held tightly between thumbs and
forefingers leaving about one inch of floss between them, using a gentle and
sawing motion, the floss is guided between the teeth. When the floss reaches
the gumline, it is then curved into a C-shape against one tooth and is gently
slid between the gum and tooth until resistance is felt. While holding the
floss tightly against the tooth, the side of the tooth is scraped gently six
times. Without removing the floss, the proximal side of the other tooth is
scraped too. This procedure is repeated on the remaining teeth.1,3
However, patients with limited ability to manage the spool
method may find the loop method helpful. The ends of a 12-inch piece of floss
is tied to form a loop or a circle. All fingers except the thumbs are placed
within the loop, so that fingers or thumbs tips used to place floss between
teeth will be 1 inch apart. The flossing procedure is the same as with the
spool method. It should be considered that in young patients with poor finger
flossing, it may be necessary that flossing is performed by the parents.1,3
There are certain conditions that may require modification
of either the type of dental floss or the method of flossing. Superfloss is
suitable for cleaning around fixed prostheses, and orthodontic appliances.
Superfloss has one end that is relatively rigid which can be inserted under
bridges or other dental appliances. However, a variety of needle like dental
floss threaders are available to insert dental floss under such appliances.20
There are dental floss holding devices made primarily to
aid patients with mental or physical dis-abilities and nursing personnel
assisting handicapped and hospitalized patients in cleaning their teeth
[Fig.5].1
What type of toothbrush and dental floss should I use? This is a very
common question always asked by dental patients. In this paper, a simplified
and comprehensive review of current toothbrushes and dental floss as well as
techniques of brushing and flossing is presented. It should be emphasized that
materials and methods are only some factors of achieving good oral hygiene. The
most important factor is for the patients to apply routine practice of the
technique chosen
- Harris N, Christen A. Primary preventive dentistry. 2nd
ed. Norwalk, CT,
Los Altos, CA: Appleton & Lange, 1987:79-90.
-
Park KK, Matis BA, Christen AC. Choosing an effective
toothbrush. A risky venture. Clin Prev Dent 1985;7(4):5-10.
-
Wake up to prevention for the smile of a lifetime: Guide
to Dental Health. J Am Dent Assoc 1987;Spec lssue:4-12.
-
Manly RS, Brudecold F. Relative abrasiveness of natural
and synthetic toothbrush bristles on cementum and dentin. J Am Dent Assoc
1957;55:779-80.
-
Wasserman C. A new deep-grooved design toothbrush. Clin
Prev Dent 7:7-11.
-
Updyke JR. A new handle for a child's toothbrush. J Dent
Child 1979;46:123.
-
Schifler CC, Emiling RC, Seibert JS, Yanke JI SL. A
comparison of plaque removal effectiveness of an electric versus a manual
toothbrush. Clin Prev Dent 1983,-5:15.
-
Glavind L, Zuener E. The effectiveness of a rotary
electric toothbrush on oral cleanliness in adults. J Clin Periodontol
1986;13:135-8.
-
Band DA, Johnson RH. Effectiveness of lnterplak
toothbrush on plaque and gingivitis. J Dent Res 1988;67;125.
-
Kreifeldt JG, Hill PH, Calisti L. A systemic study of the
plaque removal efficacy of worn toothbrushes. I Dent Res 1980;59:2047-55.
-
Frefeigh CM. Tissue changes with manual and electric
brushes.J Am Dent Assoc 1965;70:380-87.
-
Manhold JH, Franzetti, Ftasimmons L. Effect of the electric
toothbrushes on human gingiva, historical and micro-respirometer evaluation, J
Periodont Res 1965;36:135-40.
-
Greene JC. Oral health care for the
prevention and control of periodontal disease- review of the literature. In:
World Workshop on Periodontics, American Academy of Periodontology
1966;399-443.
-
Gibson JA, Wade AB. Plaque removal by the Bass & Roll
brushing techniques. J Periodontol 1977;48:456-63.
-
Spindel L, Person P. Floss design and effectiveness of
interproximal plaque removal. 1987;9:3-6.
-
Mohammed C, Monserrate V. Dental plaque removal by floss.
New Jersey Dent Soc 1965;36:4-8.
-
Zorkowski P. Effectiveness of dental floss in oral hygiene
practice. Dent Hygiene 1979;53:67-72.
-
Wunderlich RC, Lamberts DM, Caffessee RG. The effect of
waxed and unwaxed dental floss on gingival health. Part II. Crevicular fluid
flow and gingival bleeding. J Periodontol 1982;53:397-400.
-
Finkelstein P, Grossman E. The effectiveness of dental
floss in reducing gingival inflammation. J Denl Res 1979;58:1034.
-
Wong CH, Wade AB. A comparative study of effectiveness in
plaque removal by super floss and waxed floss. J Clin Periodontol
1985;12:788-95.

|