|
Use Of Nitrous Oxide Relative Analgesia In Children
Amjad H. Wyne, BDS, BSc, MDS*
Joseph O. Adenubi, BDS, MSc, MPH, FMCDS**
* Lecturer, Division of Pedodontics
**College of Dentistry, King Saud University, P.O. Box 60169, Riyadh 11545,
Saudi Arabia.
The term "analgesia" implies the loss of the sense of
pain, without loss of consciousness or the sense of touch. The term "relative
analgesia" was introduced by Cuedel (1937)1 in relation to ether. He described
the different stages (Table 1) of inhalation anaesthesia. The first stage
"analgesia" was subdivided into two sub-stages, "relative analgesia" and "total
analgesia". Pain sense is depressed progressively and is abolished just before
consciousness is lost. The point of pain abolition is known as "total
analgesia" and the approach to this as relative analgesia (Table 2).1,2
Although children in the surgery generally are co-operative,
their fear-related behaviors have been acknowledged widely as an obstacle to
dental treatment.3,4 To complete treatment, children must
co-operate, or at least passively accept treatment. Studies have shown that the
inappropriate management of the fears of children may lead to long-term
avoidance of dental care when the children become adults.5,6,7 Therefore, successful management of a child's
fear is not only essential for co operative behavior and the completion of
dental procedures, but is also important for laying the foundation for
acceptance of dentistry.
The majority of children introduced to dentistry become
relaxed and co-operative by the use of methods like Tell-Show-Do,
Reinforcement, Desensitization and Modelling. A minority still remains unco-operative.
If fear persists despite carefully conducted introductory appointments, some
form of pre-medication could be used. Sedation by inhalation of nitrous oxide
and oxygen is becoming increasingly popular in recent years, pioneered
principally by Langa.8 The ease and rapidity of
induction and quick recovery with no after-effects and
the flexibility of controls have
rendered nitrous oxide/oxygen analgesia particularly suitable for dentistry.
However, one must recognize and guard against the high level occupational
exposure to nitrous oxide which has been reported as associated with increased
rate of spontaneous abortions and reduced fertility in females.9,10 Although a definite cause and effect
relationship has not been confirmed,11 yet
adequate scavenging measures should be instituted to prevent any possible
harmful effects.10,11,12
Definition
The term "relative analgesia" refers to the use of low
concentrations of nitrous oxide with high concentrations of oxygen to produce
sedation and a degree of analgesia. By using relative analgesia patient's fear
and anxiety is replaced by a feeling of well-being and confidence - a state of
euphoria. The patient remains conscious and co-operative, with the protective
reflexes fully maintained. He also experiences a pleasant, floating, detached
sensation. As a result, the pain threshold is raised and in many cases no local
anesthetic may be necessary, but can be given readily when required, usually
without any realization from the patient.
Signs and Symptoms of Relative Analgesia
A patient under relative analgesia is conscious and his
facial expressions are those of a conscious person. The patient may report a
mild sensation of drowsiness, detachment from his immediate environments or of
euphoria. These sensations are generally regarded as pleasant. The pupils are
normal and they contract normally to light. Eyelids become heavy and wink
slowly when touched. Facial muscles are relaxed and face may become
expressionless. Respiration is normal. Muscles are relaxed. The pulse rate,
blood pressure and colour of the skin are normal. A patient may feel a tingling
sensation in the finger tips, toes or tip of the tongue as well as tingling and
numb sensations at the lips. All these symptoms indicate that the patient is
under light analgesia. All these symptoms are not always present at each
administration and a patient may go into a deeper stage without clearly
distinguishing them, so it is advisable to commence treatment on the patient.
Since we are working on a conscious patient, his verbal or physical reactions
will indicate the degree of sedation. At this stage of relative analgesia the
patient's threshold to cold, warmth and light touch is also raised.8
At a higher level of analgesia the sensations of
drowsiness, detachment and euphoria become more marked. The patient has a
feeling of lethargy. Very often he experiences a humming, droning or vibratory
sensation throughout his body. At this stage the patient may describe a feeling
of drowsiness. His voice becomes throaty and looses its natural resonance. The
patient under analgesia knows that something is going on around and about him
but he is unconcerned with what is taking place. He experiences a feeling of
relaxation, of well-being, of safety and europhia. He feels warm and
comfortable. Sound is distinct but distant. A sudden loud noise may bring him
out of his pleasant, euphoric state. His arms and legs may feel very heavy if
he attempts to lift them. Conversely, he may feel very light or floating. He
may engage himself in philosophical thoughts and attempts to solve some of the
world's problems.8,13,14,15
Benefits to the Patient
-
Relative analgesia reduces fear,
anxiety, apprehension, discomfort and pain to a degree. A state of euphoria can
be experienced.
-
It helps to develop the habit of
early and regular visits resulting in better dental health.
-
Fatigue is reduced and the patient is
more relaxed before, during and after the appointment.
-
If local anaesthesia is required it
is rarely noticed by the patient.
-
The higher than atmospheric oxygen
concentration is beneficial to the patient.
-
After an observation period of about
fifteen minutes to half an hour at the conclusion of the procedure, most of the
patients are able to resume normal activity.
Benefits to the Dentist
-
The relaxation and increased
co-operation from the patient assist directly in all procedures.
-
Long dental procedures can be carried
out unhurriedly without risk of the patient's discomfort or fatigue.
-
The dentist experiences less fatigue
because he is treating relaxed patients. This benefit is particularly important
while treating children.
-
The required sedation level can be
produced in a very short time.
-
Nitrous oxide is compatible with all
other drugs and usually allows reduced dosages.
-
Nitrous oxide has no unpleasant odor
or irritation.
-
Local anaesthesia, if required, can
be administered with the patient being only vaguely aware of the procedure.
-
Running costs are
very low.
-
Relative analgesia is a good practice-builder
due to the patient making earlier and more frequent visits and preparing others
to become new patients
Indications
The indications of relative analgesia include apprehension
related to previous negative experience of a medical or dental treatment, fear of
needles, contraindication to local analgesia (bleeding disorders), pronounced
gag reflex and treatment requiring sedation such as prolonged surgical
procedures. Relative analgesia eliminates the fear, anxiety and apprehension
associated with dental procedures. When the fear is eliminated and the child is
relaxed, a high proportion of pain involved in dental procedures is eliminated.
Very young or mentally handicapped children present special problems but
sedation can sometimes be successful if their attention and interest can be
gained.16-19
Contraindications
of Relative Analgesia
There is no absolute contraindication to the use of
nitrous oxide relative analgesia when adequate oxygenation is assured. There
is, in fact, no situation where the proper use of these gases can cause death.
However, as a dentist usually does not treat matters of life and death, it is
wise to dispense with the use of analgesia under certain circumstances.
1. Cardiac Conditions
Patients suffering from cardiac diseases are usually hypertensed
and nervous. They are not the type of individuals who look forward to dental
treatment. Making such a person more tense and apprehensive is contraindicated.
Thus, the use of analgesia solves this problem. Still, it is wise to discuss
the case with the patient's physician and divide the responsibility.8,13,20
2. Pregnancy
Analgesia is often used during labour with no harm to the
mother and child. However, since all but the most urgent work can be deferred
when necessary, it should be used with a physician's permission.9,21,22,23
3. Common
Colds
Poor and ineffective analgesia results from inability to
breathe easily through the nose. There is also a possibility of nasal or
pharyngeal infection being pushed deeper into the respiratory system due to gases
from the machines using greater pressure than atmospheric pressure. So under
these conditions use of analgesia is contraindicated.8,9,13,20,21
4. Tuberculosis
The use of any inhalation agent for the performance of
dentistry is contraindicated in tuberculosis and pulmonary diseases as the
respiratory system is already under stress.8,9,20,21
5. Acute
Fear of Losing Consciousness
The use of analgesia should be explained and suggested but
never forced in case patients are deathly afraid of losing any degree of
consciousness.12,20,21
6. Epilepsy
and Seizure Disorders
The use of analgesia in a dental office is relatively
contraindicated in such conditions due to the possibility of epileptic seizure
with all its side reactions. The person with a history of chronic seizure
activity is more sensitive to hypoxia than a normal healthy patient. Seizure
activity may be precipitated more easily due to hypoxia. Nitrous oxide is not
an epileptogenic agent and therefore may be used in these patients as long as
hypoxia is avoided. It can easily be achieved with the sedation machines and
technique of administration available today. Use of nitrous oxide sedation
reduces the stress and anxiety, which in turn reduces the possibility of
epileptic seizure because the patient is more relaxed.20,21,22 Normally, every epileptic child is encouraged
to take his/her prescribed drugs regularly and particularly before a dental
appointment.
7. Patients
under Psychiatric Treatment
Sensations under analgesia may disturb the emotional poise
of subjects under these conditions. Psychiatrists must be consulted before
administering analgesia to patients undergoing psychiatric treatment.21,22
8. Extreme
Fear
Patients having an extreme uncontrollable fear of
dentists, dentistry and analgesia, and who do not allow the dentist to
introduce it, should never be forced to take analgesia.20,21
Clinical
Application of Relative Analgesia
Technical skill alone is of little valuetothe dentist
working on a child unless the child co-operates during the treatment. Patients
of all ages, however, show withdrawal, anticipatory tension and avoidance even
in the absence of pain. When the pain is superimposed, it is impossible for the
patient to allow the dentist to perform his best work. Local anaesthesia is the
common technical aid to produce reasonable working conditions but it is
difficult to administer local anaesthesia in a nervous, fearful patient
especially the one with needle phobia. Relative analgesia produces a rapid and
profound relaxation. Moreover it is a highly suggestive state and suggestions
by the dentist are easily accepted by the patient. Combined with a degree of
analgesia, working conditions are improved remarkably. There is no aspect of
clinical dentistry which can not be enhanced by the use of relative analgesia.21,24,25
Nitrous Oxide
Dosage in Relative Analgesia
The technique of relative analgesia consists of two
components: nitrous oxide and oxygen, and semi-hypnotic suggestions. It is
thus, essentially, an interpersonal method. A feedback channel is established
between the operator and the patient to ensure that the patient is taken only
to that depth of sedation which is psychologically acceptable at that time.22,26 Nishibori et al (1979)27 presented an analysis of 985 patients seen
over a period of four years. The dosage of nitrous oxide required ranged from
10-60 percent. The majority of patients received no more than 30 percent
nitrous oxide; all age groups had a number requiring higher proportions,
especially children under 10 years of age. Allen (1984),2 in his study of 400 patients of all age groups
requiring relative analgesia, has presented an excellent analysis of dosages of
nitrous oxide analgesia. Requirements varied from 15-70 percent with 75 percent
of the patients needing no more than 30 percent. He also found that 41.7
percent of the emotionally handicapped patients (those who found it difficult
or impossible to accept dental treatment) required nitrous oxide dosages higher
than 30 percent, the highest proportion of any group. The second highest were
the children under the age of 10. Some 36.5 percent of this group required more
than 30 percent nitrous oxide compared with 22.6 percent of the older age
group.
The relationship between the systemically administered
dose of a drug and the desired effect has always been a complex one. When the
drug is introduced by the inhalation route using a nosepiece and the operation
is taking place in the mouth several additional factors are introduced. Allen
(1984)2 has divided these factors into three categories i.e. mechanical,
physiological and neurological factors.
Mechanical
Factors
In relative analgesia, gases are delivered by a somewhat
loosely fitting nosepiece with zero tension on the expiratory valve, while the
mouth is held wide open when dental procedures proceed. Considerable quantities
of nitrous oxide can escape from the periphery of the nosepiece or expiratory
valve without reaching the patient's airway. In children, variable amounts of
dilution may occur due to their inadequate nasal airways. Flow of gases is
matched with the tidal volume of the patient and the expiratory valve is set at
zero tension. There is no possibility of blowing the lation anaesthesia
machines. Thus, from a purely mechanical aspect, there is considerable interpatient
variability in the quantity of nitrous oxide inhaled.
Physiological
Factors
The adequacy of the nasal airway is reduced when the mouth
is wide open, especially in children. The presence of adenoidal tissue in young
patients adds to the difficulty as it further reduces the already small airway
present in this age group. Many children continue with the habit of
mouth-breathing even after the removal of tonsils and adenoids. In these cases
nitrous oxide in higher proportions must be used occasionally to compensate for
the inevitable air dilution. Basic metabolic rate is higher in children. It
varies a lot at different ages up to early teenage. It probably explains the
wide variation in dosage for the younger age groups. Poor physical health
reduces the dosages of nitrous oxide. There are a number of other physiological
factors which influence the gaseous exchange in the lungs. These factors
include adequacy of lung function, pattern of breathing (rapid, shallow
breathing is inefficient), the varying diffusion/pervasion rates existing in
different areas of the lungs at different times and varying degrees of adequacy
of the central respiratory drive. Because of ail these factors even identical,
partial pressures of nitrous oxide entering the lungs will not necessarily
produce the same nitrous oxide level in the blood stream.
Neurological
Factors
Individual response to all drugs covers a wide range of
variations. The administration of sedatives by the intravenous route points
towards this fact quite clearly. It is an everyday observation that response to
the same quantity of alcohol differs very widely from individual to individual.
Nitrous oxide is not different from other drugs in this respect. The maturing
state of the central nervous systems of children is one reason why younger
patients require higher dosages of nitrous oxide. Accumulated stress within the
individual may increase the dosage in some cases. The habitual use of alcohol
not only produces the tolerance to alcohol itself but also to other CNS depressants.
Therefore, the dosage of nitrous oxide required to produce sedative analgesia
will be high in people consuming alcohol regularly. In mentally-handicapped
patients the influence of site and degree of neurological damage on the dosage
of nitrous oxide is not yet clear. In general, it seems that the more severe
the handicap the greater the dosage of nitrous oxide is required.
Inappropriate management of the fears of children may lead
to long term avoidance of dental care from childhood even up to adult life.
Therefore successful management of child's fears is essential for cooperative
behavior and the completion of dental treatment as well as for the laying of
the foundation for acceptance of dental treatment by the child for life. This
article reviews the role of nitrous oxide analgesia in the minority of children
who are fearful that they need to be managed by sedation instead of the more
common methods of tell show and do, reinforcement and modelling.
The indications, contraindications and benefits of nitrous
oxide analgesia are discussed. The clinical application of relative analgesia
including the factors that may influence the dosage both in children and adults
as well as signs, and symptoms are fully catalogued. The ease and rapidity of induction
as well as quick recovery, with no aftereffects have proved and will continue
to recommend nitrous oxide/oxygen analgesia as a suitable and successful
behavioral guidance for fearful children in dentistry.
- Guedel AE,
Inhalation anaesthesia, New York:
MacMillan Co, 1937:15.
-
Allen WA.
Nitrous oxide dosage in relative analgesia. Br Dent J 1984;156:9-15.
-
Levitas
TC. Home: hand over mouth exercise. J Dent Child 1974;39:178-82.
-
Weinstein
P. Difficult children: the practical experience of 145 private practitioners.
Pediatr Dent 1981;3:303-5.
-
Berggren
U, Meynert G. Dental fear and avoidance: causes, symptoms and consequences. J
Am Dent Assoc 1984;109:247-51.
-
Lautch H.
Dental phobia. Br J Psych 1971;119:151-58.
-
Molin C,
Seeman K. Disproportionate dental anxiety: clinical and nosological
considerations. Acta Odontol Scand 1979;28:197-212.
-
Langa H.
Relative analgesia in dental practice: inhalation analgesia with nitrous oxide.
Philadelphia:
FA Davis Co, 1976:135-231.
-
Cohen EN,
Byron WB, Marion
LW. Occupational disease in dentistry and chronic exposure to trace anaesthetic
gases. J Am Dent Assoc 1980;101:21-3.
-
Rowland AS, Baird DD.
Reduced fertility among women employed as dental assistants exposed to high
levels of nitrous oxide. N Engl J Med 1992;327:993-7.
-
11. Federation
Dentaire Internationale. Dental
anesthetic gases-hazards and hygiene. Technical Report No. 21. Int Dent
J 1985;35:173-4.
-
Allen
WA. Nitrous oxide in the surgery:
pollution and scavenging. Br Dent J 1985;157:222-30.
-
Bennett
CR. Conscious sedation in dental practice. 2nd ed. St. Louis; CV Mosby Co, 1978:67-81.
-
14. Barber
J. The relationship between
nitrous oxide conscious sedation
and the hypnotic state. J Am Dent Assoc 1979;99:624-6.
-
Rosenberg
HM. Behaviour modification for child dental patient. J Dent Child 1974;41
111-4.
-
Berger DE,
Allen CD, Everett
GB. An assessment of the analgesic effects of nitrous oxide on the primary
dentition. J Dent Child 1972;39:265-8.
-
17. Hallonsten
AL. Nitrous
oxide scavenging in
dental surgery. I. A comparison of the efficiency of different
scavenging devices. Swed Dent J 1982;6:203-l 3.
-
18. Major
E, Winder M,
Brook AH, Berman
DS. An evaluation of nitrous
oxide in the dental treatment of anxious children. Br Dent J 1981 ;151:186-8.
-
Roberts
GJ. Relative analgesia in clinical
practice. In: Coplans MP, Green RA, eds.
Anaesthesia and sedation in dentistry. Amsterdarm:Elsevier, 1983:Chapter 10.
-
Malamed
SF. Inhalation sedation in sedation: a guide to patient management. 2nd ed, Toronto: CV Mosby,
1989:21-37.
-
Allen KR.
Personal communication. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of
Dentistry, University
of Adelaide, Feb 1990.
-
Allen WA.
Relative analgesia. Dent Pract 1976,14:7,8,10,12-14.
-
Roberts
GJ, Gibson A, Porter J, Dezoysa 5. Relative analgesia: an evaluation of the
efficacy and safety, Br Dent J 1979;146:177-82.
-
24, Allen GD. Dental anaesthesia and analgesia.
3rd ed. Baltimore: William & Wilkins Co, 1979:254-66.
-
Andlaw RJ,
Rock WP. A manual of paedodontics. 2nd ed. UK: Churchill Livingstone,
1987:20-4.
-
Baum JJ,
Tekavee MM. Maintained hypalgesic state (operative phase). Anesth Prog
1970;17:133-38.
-
Nishibori M,
Suzuki N, Amemiya Y, Nakachi S. Clinical experience in inhalation sedation with
nitrous oxide and oxygen in a dental office. Proceedings of the second
International Congress on Modern Pain Control. London:SAAD, 1979:147-54.
|