|
Influence Of Sprue Design On Soundness Of RPD Casting
Yousef F. Talic, BDS, MSc, DASO, FICOl, DICOI
College of Dentistry, King Saud University, P.O. Box 601 69, Riyadh 11 545, Saudi Arabia
Three different sprue designs were investigated visually and
radiographically to determine the influence of spruing arrangement on the
soundness of RPD castings. The first sprue design was a tree sprue design
consisted of four wax formers, 3 mm in diameter each, going directly to four
different spots on the major connector. The second sprue design was a
circular sprue design. The circular feeder was made from a 3 mm diameter wax.
The auxiliary sprues emanating from the circular feeder were six in number, 2
mm in diameter each, and were attached directly to the major connector. The
circular feeder was attached to the sprue button by four formers, 3 mm in
diameter each. The third sprue design was designated as the bali sprue design.
The ball design consisted of four feeders, 3 mm in diameter each, as with the
tree design except that a 5 mm ball reservoir was placed on each feeder, 5 mm
away from the wax pattern. Five frameworks of the same dental cast were
prepared using each sprue design. The results showed that the three sprue
designs used in this study are suitabie for producing sound RPD frame castings.
When the circular sprue design is used, allowances should be made to assure
adequate meshwork thickness.
Sprue design plays a major role in casting any type of
alloy for fixed and removable prosthesis. Preston
and Berger1 stated that "spruing is an art which is not
understood carefully". Many researchers examined the effect of different sprue
designs on the porosity of fixed partial denture components.2-4 However, the influence of sprue design on
soundness of RPD frameworks was not adequately investigated.
A removable partial denture (RPD) framework should
be free from defects within its structure in order to fulfill its function.
Yet, many RPD castings contain internal and external defects of varying size
and shape which can cause failure of the prosthesis5 or result in an inferior appliance.6
Defects such as fissures and microporosities
with surface connections may result in increased corrosion of the alloy.7 Large pores or many porosities when situated
in critical regions of the RPD frame may promote fracture.8 The presence of defects in RPD castings
is said to depend on many factors including the spruing method and
the metal feeding direction. Evaluation of such defects can be achieved both
visually and radiographically. Faults in a dental casting can result from one
or more elements such as spruing,9-15 investing,16 casting,10,16,20 alloy melting,9,11,12,16 wax elimination, 10,16-20 and freezing of casting.9 Dental technicians have the habit of ignoring
the effect of sprue design on the casting by producing different designs which
may affect the quality of castings. This study investigated the effect of
various sprue designs on soundness of RPD castings
A dental cast representing Kennedy Class I Modification I
Removable Partial Denture (RPD) was chosen to serve as the master cast. The RPD
framework design was decided utilizing three terminal abutments, teeth # 13
with a ledge resl and # 16 and # 24 with mesial rests. Circumferential clasps
with retention bucaiiy and reciprocal arms lingually were designed on teeth #
16 and # 24. The RPD clasp with mid-buccal retention was designed on tooth # 13.
Proximal plates were placed on the mesial of # 16 and distals of # 13 and # 24.
Anterior and posterior palatal strap was chosen as the major connector.
Undercuts on the master cast were blocked out. The cast was relieved, and
external and internal finish lines were established. The master cast was then
duplicated using Perplex* duplicating material to produce 15 identical
refractory casts. The casts were divided to three groups. Each group of five
casts were sprued with a different spruing arrangement using pre-formed wax**.
Three different sprue design arrangements were tested.
The first spruing arrangement was designated as the tree
sprue design. A tree sprue design consisted of four wax formers, each 3mm in
diameter, going directly to four different spots on the major connector.
The second spruing arrangement was designated as the
circular sprue design of which circular feeder was made from a 3mm diameter
wax. Auxiliary sprues emanating from the circular feeder were six, each was 2mm
in diameter and were attached directly to the major connector. The circular
feeder was attached to the sprue button by four sprues, each 3mm in diameter.
The third sprue design was designated as the ball sprue
design which consisted of four feeders, 3mm in diameter as with the tree sprue
design except that a 5mm ball reservoir was placed on each feeder at 5mm away
from the wax pattern.
Five refractory casts were thus sprued by one of each of
the three spruing arrangements. All wax patterns were invested using the same
batch of Wirovest*** investment material. Refractory casts were left to bench
set for two hours before burnout.
A two-stage burn-out cycle was employed whereas the
investment block was placed in a room temperature oven with the sprue base
resting on the muffle floor. The oven was heated to 300°C and maintained at
that temperature for 30 minutes. The ring was then rotated so that the sprue
base is facing upward and the oven temperature was raised to 975°C in 3.5
hours. The investment was then heat soaked at 975°C for 45 minutes before it
became ready for casting.
A centrifugal induction casting machine* was used and the
metal was cast at 1200°C using Wironit** cobalt-chromium alloy. The centrifugal
force used was 9 bars and is the same as is used with clinical RPD castings in
the laboratories at King Saud University College of Dentistry. All RPD
frameworks were cast using a full metal charge of 25-35 gms. Variation in
weight of the casting metal was due to differences in spruing arrangement and
size. The appropriate weight for each spruing arrangement was determined
experimentally in a pilot study.
After recovering the castings from the investment, they
were blasted with 50 micron aluminum oxide*** at 80 psi and were ultrasonicaliy
cleaned. All 15 RPD frameworks were completed and void of any major deficiency.
After photographing the cast RPD frameworks and marking each with a random
number, all sprues were cut-off and all frameworks were finished and each was
placed in an envelope carrying its random number. Examples of the laboratory
procedure in producing the RPD frameworks are shown in Fig. 1 a and b. Two
evaluation procedures were used to fully assess the absence of porosities from
the cast RPD frameworks.
- Two clinicians examined each framework visually using a 5x
magnification glass. Each clinician, working independently, used a special form
made for this purpose and reported his findings to a third examiner. Each
evaluator was asked to examine the 3 clasps, the major connector and the two
meshwork areas for either a porosity or a small casting deficiency and report
his findings as scores. Each component of each framework was scored from 0-3 or
more based on the number of defects visible. No defects is a score of 0, one
defect in a given component is a score of 1, two defects in a given component
or one defect in each of two components of the same type (clasps or meshworks)
is a score of 2, and so on.
-
Occlusal film radiographs* were taken
on all frameworks (90kV[p] and 15mA). Each radiograph was placed in an envelope
carrying a random number different from the visual examination random number.
The radiographs were then evaluated and ranked by two clinicians independently.
A 5x magnification glass and a light box were used to aid vision in evaluating
the radiographs
Several statistical analyses capable of delineating the
influence of sprue design on the experimental outcome (porosity) can be used.
Since there was no interest in the variation due to examiners the average
values of the two scores were used. Thus, the
only variables considered
were two, the spruing arrangement3 and the observation method.2 Correlation matrix has been computed to show
simple correlations between the variables. Multiple linear regression analysis
has been conducted to observe the effect of spruing arrangement and that of the
observation method. Analysis of variance has been computed.
The visual rankings of clasps, major connectors and
meshworks for the 15 frameworks are reported in Table 1. It was noted that
there were no defects observed in any of the clasps. However, defects in major
connectors were eight with as many as three (3) defects in one major connector.
Defects in meshworks were eight (8), all of which occurred when a circular
sprue arrangement was used with as many as two defects in one framework.
The radiographic rankings of the components examined are reported
in Table 2. Again, there were no radiographic defects in any of the clasps.
Defects in major connectors were 8. The three defects visually observed in one
major connector were also seen radiographically. Defects in meshworks were 11.
One of the meshwork that depicted two defects visually showed five defects
radiographically. Otherwise, the visual and radiographic defects were
identical.
The number of defects as a function of factors (spruing
method, observation method and area examined) is reported in Table 3.
Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviations) for defects as a function of
the three factors are shown in Fig. 2. Table 4 shows that the spruing method
and area examined have no significant influence on defect occurrence. However,
the occurrence of defects was significantly influenced by the method of
observation. In other words, clasps, major connectors and meshworks were not evenly
influenced by changing the sprue design; rather they were affected differently.
To detect which of the three areas was most affected by changing sprue design,
the multiple range analysis reported in Table 5 was conducted. The analysis
showed that clasps were not affected, however major connectors and meshwork
were affected. While meshworks seemed more affected by sprue design than the
major connector, homogeneity test showed no significant difference between
them.
The fact that clasps were less subjective to casting
defects when compared to meshwork areas is likely due to the difference in
their cross-sectional areas. Defects in the major connector areas
are likely due to the relatively large liquid metal volume in this area and its
slower rate of solidification. When an area of the RPD frame remains liquified
after the sprue feeders have solidified, this area becomes subjected to
shrinkage porosity.
Results and statistical analysis of this study conclude
that any of the three sprue designs used in this study is suitable for
producing sound RPD frame castings. When the circular sprue design is used,
allowances should be made to assure adequate meshwork thickness.
The author gratefully acknowledge the experimental
assistance and guidance offered by Prof. H. Mohammed-Al Tahawi, Chairman
Department of Removable Prosthetic Dental Sciences, KSU College of Dentistry.
Acknowledgment is also due to Dr. Nazeer Khan, Biostatistician, Research Center for his valuable assistance in
the statistical analysts.
- Preston JD, Berger R.
Some laboratory variables affecting ceramometal alloys. Dent Clin North Am
1977;21:717-28.
-
Peregrina
A, Schorr BL. Comparison of the effects of three sprue designs on the internal
porosity in crowns cast within a silver-free high-palladium alloy. J Prostbet
Dent 1990; 64:162-66.
-
Compagni
R, Faucher RR, Yuodelis RA. Effect of sprue design, casting machine, and heat
source on casting porosity. J ProsthetDent 1984;52:41-5.
-
Young HM,
Margualles-Bonnet R, Hamdi Mohammed. The relationship of metal volume and sprue
design to porosity in non-precious castings. Quintessence Dent Technol 1987;
11:399-404.
-
Elarbi EA,
Ismail YH, Azarbal, Saini TS. Radiographic detection of porosities in removable
partial denture castings. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:674-77.
-
Earnshaw
R, Cobalt-chromium alloys in dentistry. Br Dent J 1985:101:67.
-
Strandman
E, Lockowandt P. An equipment for standardized casting of dental Co-Cr alloys
in dentistry. Oriontol Revy 1976;27:145-54.
-
Harcourt HJ. Fractures of cobalt-chromium castings. Br
Dent J 1981 ;110:43.
-
Ryge C,
Koza SF, Fairhurst CW. Porosities in dental gold castings. J Am Dent Assoc
1957;54:746-54.
-
Asgar K,
Peyton FA. Pits on inner surfaces of cast gold crowns. | Prosthet Dent
1959;9-.446-S6.
-
Kelly CP.
Study of porosity and voids in dental gold castings. J Dent Res 1970; 49
(Suppl):986.
-
Nieisen
JP, Oilermann R. Suck-back porosity. Quintessence Dent Techno! 1976;1:61 -5.
-
Phillips
RW. Studies on the density of casting as related to other position in the ring.
J Am Dent Assoc 1947;35:329-42-
-
BrtJmfieid
RC. Dentai gold structure, analysis and practicalities. New York:)F Jelenko Co,
Inc, 1949.
-
DeWald E.
The relationship of pattern position to the flow of gold and casting
completeness. J Prosthet Dent 1979;41:531-34.
-
Strickland
WD, Sturdevant CM. Porosity in the full cast crown, J Am Dent Assoc 1959;58:69.
-
AdyAB.
Effect of solidification timeon themicrostructure and physical properties of
dental gold casting alloys. J Dent Res 1966;45:921-26.
-
Phillips
RW. Skinner's science of dental materials. 7th ed. Philadelphia:WB Saunders Co,
1973:462.
-
Leinfelder
KF, Fairhurst CW, Ryge G. Porosities in dental gold castings I!. Effects of
mold temperature, sprue size and dimension of wax pattern. J Am Dent Assoc
1963;67:816.
-
Vincent
PF, Stevens L, Basford KE. A comparison of the casting ability of precious and
nonprecious alloys for porcelain veneering. J Prosthet Dent 1977:37:527-36.
|