Bilateral Congenially Missing Mandibular Canines With
Supplementary Lower Incisor - A Case Report
Sivakami Ramaraj, BDS, MSc, DOrth RCS, MOrth RCS,
Yousif Mirza, BDS
Al Nairn Health Center, Ministry of Health, P.O. Box 12, Bahrain.
Certain teeth have an increased tendency to be congenitally missing
more often than the others. The rarest and least reported as missing
are the mandibular canines. In this paper, we report a case of missing
mandibular canines and the presence of a supplementary mandibular
incisor.
The size, shape and number of teeth are under genetic control. In
humans, changes in these dental morphological characteristics are not uncommon.
Hypodontia (oligodontia) is a genetically caused anomaly although neither the
genetic mechanism nor mode of genetic transfer of the anomaly is clear.1
The anomaly is however associated with known syndromes such as ectodermal
dysplasia and Down's syndrome.2
Hypodontia affects females more than males23 and its prevalence is 0.1
-0.9% in primary dentition and 3.5-6.5%
in permanent dentition.2 Although any tooth may be congenitally
missing, there is a greater tendency for certain teeth to be missing more
frequently than others. The most frequently missing teeth are the third molars,
upper lateral incisors, second premo- lars and lower central incisors.4
Missing canines are rare, this is particularly so of the mandibular canine.5
A review of the English literature disclosed a report
on congenitally missing maxillary canines in two cases.6 In this
paper, we report a case of con- genitally missing bilateral mandibular canines
and the presence of one supplementary lower incisor.
A 14-year-old female [Fig. 1], with a chief com- plaint
of proclination of upper incisors that com- promised her aesthetics, was
referred to our Orthodontics Clinic by a dentist. She appeared healthy with no
evidence of obvious systemic or oral diseases. She gave a history of one
admission to a hospital for tonsillectomy. She had no previous dental treatment
of any sort before she saw the dentist who referred her to our Orthodontics Clinic.
The information was confirmed by her mother.
Clinical
Examination
Extraoral examination showed a true lateral con- vex
profile suggestive of a mild Class II skeletal pat- tern with slightly
increased lower facial height [Fig. 2]. Intraoral examination revealed missing
18, 28, 33, 38, 43, 48 and the presence of a supernumer- ary lower incisor
[Figs. 3,4]. Intraoral soft tissues appeared normal. She had a Class II molar
relation and Class II Division 1 incisal relation with a 10 mm overjet [Figs.
4,5,6].
Radiographic
Examination
Routine panoramic view [Fig.7] revealed unerupted third molars, missing
lower canines and a supernumerary lower incisor. It was confirmed from the
patient's record at her health center that she had no previous dental
extractions.
Supernumerary teeth, hypodontia, megadontia and
microdontia have all been associated with genetic and environmental etiological
factors. It is rare to see congenitally missing mandibular canines. This case
which was associated with the presence of a supplementary mandibular incisor was
equally a rare case.
The incidence of congenitally missing teeth have been reported in
various populations (Table 1). Similar information on Bahrain had not
been pub- lished. In the orthodontics records of our clinic, the case described
in this paper was the first case of congenitally missing mandibular canines.
The case might encourage a future study in the incidence of congenitally
missing teeth in Bahrain.
-
Moyers RE. Handbook of orthodontics. 4th ed. Yearbook
Medical Publ Inc, 1988:121.
-
Mitchell L, David AM. Oxford handbook of clinical dentistry. Oxford: University Press,
1991:68.
-
Brook AH. A unifying aetiological explanation for
anomalies of human tooth number and size. Arch Oral Biol 1984;29:373-78.
-
Mills JRE. Principles and practice of orthodontics. 2nd
ed. Churchill Livingston, 1987:42.
-
Shaver, Hine, Levy. Textbook of oral pathology. 4th ed.
WB Saunders, 1983:46.
-
Postello DR. Congenitally missing maxillary canines: a
report of two cases. OntDentJ 1984;61:10-12.

|