OOPS. Your Flash player is missing or outdated.Click here to update your player so you can see this content.
ISSN (Print) 1013-9052
EISSN 1658-3558
The Saudi Dental Journal,
P.O. Box 52500,
Riyadh 11563,
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Tel.
966-1-467-7328
Fax.
933-1-467-7308 /
966-1-467-7534
Email
saudidj@ksu.edu.sa

SDJ

Bilateral Congenially Missing Mandibular Canines With

Supplementary Lower Incisor - A Case Report

Sivakami Ramaraj, BDS, MSc, DOrth RCS, MOrth RCS,
Yousif Mirza, BDS
Al Nairn Health Center, Ministry of Health, P.O. Box 12, Bahrain.

 

Abstract 

 

Certain teeth have an increased tendency to be congenitally missing more often than the others. The rarest and least reported as missing are the mandibular canines. In this paper, we report a case of missing mandibular canines and the presence of a supplementary mandibular incisor.
 

Introduction

 

The size, shape and number of teeth are under genetic control. In humans, changes in these dental morphological characteristics are not uncommon. Hypodontia (oligodontia) is a genetically caused anomaly although neither the genetic mechanism nor mode of genetic transfer of the anomaly is clear.1 The anomaly is however associated with known syndromes such as ectodermal dysplasia and Down's syndrome.2 Hypodontia affects females more than males23 and its prevalence is 0.1 -0.9% in primary dentition and 3.5-6.5% in permanent dentition.2 Although any tooth may be congenitally missing, there is a greater tendency for certain teeth to be missing more frequently than others. The most frequently missing teeth are the third molars, upper lateral incisors, second premo- lars and lower central incisors.4 Missing canines are rare, this is particularly so of the mandibular canine.5

A review of the English literature disclosed a report on congenitally missing maxillary canines in two cases.6 In this paper, we report a case of con- genitally missing bilateral mandibular canines and the presence of one supplementary lower incisor.

 

Case History

 

A 14-year-old female [Fig. 1], with a chief com- plaint of proclination of upper incisors that com- promised her aesthetics, was referred to our Orthodontics Clinic by a dentist. She appeared healthy with no evidence of obvious systemic or oral diseases. She gave a history of one admission to a hospital for tonsillectomy. She had no previous dental treatment of any sort before she saw the dentist who referred her to our Orthodontics Clinic. The information was confirmed by her mother.

Clinical Examination

Extraoral examination showed a true lateral con- vex profile suggestive of a mild Class II skeletal pat- tern with slightly increased lower facial height [Fig. 2]. Intraoral examination revealed missing 18, 28, 33, 38, 43, 48 and the presence of a supernumer- ary lower incisor [Figs. 3,4]. Intraoral soft tissues appeared normal. She had a Class II molar relation and Class II Division 1 incisal relation with a 10 mm overjet [Figs. 4,5,6].

Radiographic Examination

Routine panoramic view [Fig.7] revealed unerupted third molars, missing lower canines and a supernumerary lower incisor. It was confirmed from the patient's record at her health center that she had no previous dental extractions.


Discussion

 

Supernumerary teeth, hypodontia, megadontia and microdontia have all been associated with genetic and environmental etiological factors. It is rare to see congenitally missing mandibular canines. This case which was associated with the presence of a supplementary mandibular incisor was equally a rare case.

The incidence of congenitally missing teeth have been reported in various populations (Table 1). Similar information on Bahrain had not been pub- lished. In the orthodontics records of our clinic, the case described in this paper was the first case of congenitally missing mandibular canines. The case might encourage a future study in the incidence of congenitally missing teeth in Bahrain.

 

References

 

  1. Moyers RE. Handbook of orthodontics. 4th ed. Yearbook Medical Publ Inc, 1988:121.
  2. Mitchell L, David AM. Oxford handbook of clinical dentistry. Oxford: University Press, 1991:68.
  3. Brook AH. A unifying aetiological explanation for anomalies of human tooth number and size. Arch Oral Biol 1984;29:373-78.
  4. Mills JRE. Principles and practice of orthodontics. 2nd ed. Churchill Livingston, 1987:42.
  5. Shaver, Hine, Levy. Textbook of oral pathology. 4th ed. WB Saunders, 1983:46.
  6. Postello DR. Congenitally missing maxillary canines: a report of two cases. OntDentJ 1984;61:10-12.

Tables

 


  1995-2-109-1


1995-2-109-2

1995-2-110-1

 
Website designed and maintained by DeltaCAS