• JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator

ISSN (Print) 1013-9052
EISSN 1658-3558

The Saudi Dental Journal,
P.O. Box 52500,
Riyadh 11563,
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Tel.
966-1-467-7328
Fax.
933-1-467-7308 /
966-1-467-7534
Email
saudidj@ksu.edu.sa

Evaluation Of The Film Thickness Of New Adhesive Luting Resins

 
Watid Sadig, BDS, MS* and Emad Al-Qudami, BDS**
*King Saud University, College of Dentistry, P.O. Box 60169, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia.
**Resident, Aramco Dental Center, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.


Recently, several composite resins have been reformulated as adhesive luting agents. The film thickness of some resinous cements has been reported in the literature, however the results were inconsistent. The purpose of this investigation was to compare the film thickness of five relatively new adhesive luting resins with that of zinc phosphate cement. The method used was generally in compliance with the American Dental Association (ADA) specification No. 8 for zinc phosphate cement. Tested materials were manipulated as described by the manufacturer. The film thickness of each cement was measured 10 times. The results, presented in an increas­ing order of film thickness were: Mirage FLC, Panavia Ex, Voco F21, Flecks zinc phosphate, C & B Metabond, and finally All-Bond. The film thickness of the adhesive luting resins tested were comparable to or thinner than zinc phosphate cement except for All-Bond luting resin. Sugges­tions are made regarding the selection of an adhesive luting resin.

Saudi Dental Journal 1995;7(2):77-81

 
Website designed and maintained by DeltaCAS