|
Hydrofluoric Acid Etching Of Flexoceram Inlay Porcelain:
A Microscopic Study
B. O. Olorunfemi, BDS, M Med Sc
Assir Dental Center, P.O. Box 1393, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
This study was carried out to determine the hydrofluoric
acid (HF) concentration and time most suitable to use with Flexoceram
inlay porcelain which is a new product on the market. This study has
shown that 10% hydrofluoric acid is effective in etching Flexoceram
inlay porcelain and that this concentration produces optimum etch
patterns at 90 seconds of acid etching. It has also shown that
hydrofluoric acid preferentially attacks the interface between the
glass and the leucite crystals of the material.
It has been suggested that an initial rough surface morphology is
appropriate for bonding as it tends to increase the physical area available for
reaction and adherence.12 Etching the fitting surface of the veneer
to increase the surface area and to create a micro-mechanical bond to composite resin, is con- sidered fundamental to
the strength of the porce- lain-resin interface. Susceptibility of porcelain to
etching has been shown by a number of work- ers.3'4'5
It is believed that etching the surface of the ven- eer
is paramount to the achievement of high bond strengths. However, the standard
procedure to achieve an adequate etch pattern is yet to emerge as there is no
agreement on what etchant to use and for how long to etch. The significance of
this etching to the bond strength achieved may be responsi- ble for the large
number of suggestions, some of which are presented in Table 1. Flexoceram is a new
product on the market and, as such, this study was carried out to determine the
proper HF con- centration and time suitable for etching.6
Flexoceram inlay porcelain powder and liquid* and
hydrofluoric acid** were used in this study. Thirty porcelain discs, measuring
8mm x 4mm x 2mm, were fabricated according to a method described in 1992.7
Twelve discs were used with 1 % HF and eighteen with the 10% HF.
The phase(s) being etched within the Flexoceram porcelain
were studied under the optical and the scanning electron microscopes following
short etching times with 1 % hydrofluoric acid for the fol- lowing periods: 10
seconds, 20 seconds, 25 sec- onds, 30 seconds, 35 seconds, 40 seconds, 50 seconds
and 60 seconds.
The degree of etching within the ceramic, fol- lowing
treatment with 10% HF during long etching times, was also studied to determine
a suitable etch time for the ceramic. The samples were etched for 30 seconds,
90 seconds, 2 minutes, 3 minutes, 5 minutes and 10 minutes.
Three specimens for each period of etching were weighed
using a microbalance* before and after etching following ultrasonic cleaning
and drying in the oven at 200°C for at least six hours. The loss in weight was
calculated from the difference between the two measurements.
All etching was done in the fume hood and the specimens
were washed under a running tap of laboratory grade distilled water before
being ultra- sonically cleaned for at least 30 minutes.
Scanning electron micrographs (SEM) represent- ing the
results of etching Flexoceram discs for the short etch times with 1%
hydrofluoric acid are shown in Figures 1 and 2. The figures show that while the
acid attacked all the phases in the mate- rial, there is a preferential attack
at the interface of the leucite crystals with the glassy phase. Etching of the
leucite crystals exposed the lenticular plates and the intertwined internal
substructure of the leucite crystals. This became most prominent between 25 and
35 seconds etch times. No other phases were evident.
The average loss in weight following etching of the
samples with 10% hydrofluoric acid for various lengths of time are summarized
in Table 2. The resulting etch patterns following the treatments are also shown
in Figures 3-6. These results show that for the 10% concentration of
hydrofluoric acid, there was no significant change or improvement in the etch
pattern despite increase in loss of the mate- rial following etching for more
than 2 minutes. The etched surface progressively became uniformly non-porous
with distinguishable micro-undercuts that presents a complex honeycomb
appearance. The higher magnification in Figure 6 shows that the etched surface
was both intricate, complicated and probably delicate.
Using 1 % hydrofluoric acid for short periods of time
demonstrated the initial stages of acid etching of Flexoceram inlay porcelain
and showed that there is a preferential attack at the leucite/glass interface
in addition to the dissolution of the glassy phase. This becomes clearly
evident at about 25 seconds of etching as shown in Figure 2. This figure also
reveals that the leucite crystals are attacked as their internal substructure
is exposed showing the lenticular plates and intertwined structure. No other
phases were evident in Flexoceram inlay porcelain.
The presence of microcracks in this porcelain is evident
in Figures 1 and 2. These cracks also served as areas of penetration for the
etching solution. Other studies have shown that the microstructure of
Flexoceram inlay porcelain is heterogenous, consisting of leucite crystals in a
glassy matrix. Further, the large polygonal crystals of leucite were shown to
be surrounded by microcracks and an intertwined dendritic substructure of the
leucite crystals.8 The microcracks are thought to be due to either
the incompatibility in the coefficients of ther- mal expansion of the leucite
crystals and the glass and/or due to volumetric changes that occur within the
leucite crystals during cooling.89
Investigation of the loss in weight following etch- ing
for various lengths of time with 10% HF was done to determine the ceramic's
resistance to dis- solution. Calamia6 suggested that each porcelain should
be tested to determine the appropriate etch time and concentration that would
produce an acceptable etch pattern. In this study, etching for longer than two
minutes did not produce any remarkably different surface pattern despite the increase
in weight loss.
The increase in weight loss of the material, Table 2,
suggests a decrease in strength of the laminate veneer when etched beyond 2
minutes. Using a Flexoceram inlay porcelain, there was no evidence of reduction
in the etching ability of hydrofluoric acid with time as reported in some
previous studies.1'2'5
The results of bond strength tests from other studies
showed that surface treatment of dental porcelain significantly improved the
bond between the porcelain and composite resin.2'71013 The
reported improvement in bond strength after etch- ing the porcelain surface may
be explained by the micro-mechanical interlocking between the etched porcelain
surface and composite resin cement. Hydrofluoric acid dissolves the glassy
phase of dental porcelain. It also attacks the interface between the leucite
crystals in Flexoceram inlay porcelain preferentially. It is possible that
dislodge- ment of those leucite crystals that are surrounded by microcrack
occurs during etching and rinsing the surface. The resultant effect creates
micropores and micro-undercuts within the porcelain resembl- ing an intricate
honey-comb structure into which the resin can flow to produce a
micro-mechanical interlocking and the reported higher bond strengths.
This study has shown that 10% hydrofluoric acid is
effective in etching Flexoceram inlay porcelain. This concentration produces
optimum etch pat- terns at 90 seconds acid etching time. It has also been shown
that etching produces a micro- mechanical retentive effect on the porcelain
sur- face that is likely to improve its bond strength to composite resin. This
study has also showed that hydrofluoric acid attacks all the phases in Flexoceram
porcelain but preferentially invades the interface between the glass and the
leucite crystals.
-
Bailey LF, Bennett RJ. Dicor surface treatments for enhanced
bonding. J Dent Res 1988;67:925-31.
-
Stangel I, Nathanson D, Hsu CS. Shear strength of the composite
bond to etched porcelain. J Dent Res 1987;66:1460-65.
-
Weyl WA. Fluorine chemistry. New York:Academic Press Inc, 1950, Vol 1.
-
Maloney FTJ. Glass in the modern world: A study in
mate- rials development. London:Aldus
Books, 1967:Chapter 2:40.
-
Sposetti VJ,ShenC, Lerin AC. The effect of topical
fluoride application on porcelain restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:677-82.
-
Calamia
JR. Etched porcelain veneers: the current state of the art. Quintessence Int
1985;16:5-12.
-
Olorunfemi BO. Etched bonded surface of ceramic ven- eers.
Master in Med Sci dissertation, University
of Shef- field, Sheffield, UK,
1992.
-
Shareef MY, Piddock V, Messer PF, vanNoort R. Charac- terization
and microstructural analysis of some dental porcelains. J Dent Res 1992;71:567,
Abstr # 414.
-
Barreiro MM, Riesgo O, Vicente EE. Phase identification in
dental porcelains for ceramo-metal restorations. Dent Mat 1989;5:51-57.
-
Hobo S, Iwata T. A new
laminate veneer technique using castable apatite ceramic material. II.
Practical procedures. Quintessence Int 1985;16:509-17.
-
Sorensen JA, Engleman MJ, Tonees TJ, Avera SP. Shear bond strength of
composite resin to porcelain. Int J Pros- thodont 1991;4:17-23.
-
Simonsen
RJ, Calamia JR. Tensile bond strength of etched porcelain. J Dent Res 1983;Abstr
# 1154.
-
Hsu C, Stangel I,
Nathanson D. Shear bond strength of resin to etched porcelain. J Dent Res
1985;64:296.
-
Horn HR. Porcelain laminate veneers bonded to etched enamel. Dent Clin
North Am 1983;27:671-84.
-
Lacy AM, Laluz J, Watanabe LG, Dellinges M. Effect of porcelain surface
treatment on the bond strength to com- posite. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:288-91.

|