|
In-Vitro Corrosion Measurements of Ni-Ti Wrought alloys
Salwa E. Khier, BDS, MSD, MSc, PhD*; William A. Brantley, PhD**
*King saud University, P.O.Box 60169, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia
**College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Ohio, U.S.A.
Nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) orthodontic wire alloys
are the current focus of intensive research activity. Several new
brands have been introduced. These wires are capable of being activated
or deactivated at a nearly constant force level. The purpose of this
investigation was to characterize the potentiodynamic polarization
behavior for various Ni-Ti wire alloys and to compare their in-vitro
corrosion. Six different types of Ni-Ti wires were selected, Nitinol
SE, Sentinol, NiTi, Tkanal, Orthonol and Nitinol alloys, with
cross-section dimensions of: 0.016 and 0.018 inch for round specimens
or 0.018x0.025 and 0.021x0.025 inch for rectangular specimens.
Specimens were maintained in an artificial saliva which was adjusted to
a pH = 6. A 500 m! air-exposed saliva solution was used in a Princeton
corrosion cell. The anodic and cathodic polarization experiments were
conducted using an Aardvark potentiostat. The potentiodynamic behavior
of all six Ni-Ti wires was generally similar. Sentinol, Titanal and
Orthonol wires showed breakdown of passive film during testing and the
other three wires remained passive over the entire range of the cyclic
voltage used.
In principle, it would be difficult to predict the
corrosion behavior of nitinol alloys, because nickel is not corrosion resistant
in saline solutions such as sea water while titanium has excellent corrosion
resistance under the same conditions.13 The resistance of some
nitinol alloys to corrosion in sea water has been evaluated by conducting high
velocity impingement, cavitation erosion, stress corrosion and crevice
corrosion measurements.4,5 The results of these tests have shown
these alloys to be quite resistant to marine corrosion.
Resistance to corrosion in the oral environment is an important
consideration in the selection of a metallic orthodontic appliance, although
most of these appliances are temporary.6 The corrosion behavior of
nitinol orthodontic wire alloys in a 1% NaCl solution has been evaluated by
cyclic polarization, with stepwise increases (forward direction) in the
potential differences from 500 mV SCE (Saturated Calomel Electrode) to +300 mV
SCE followed by a stepwise decrease (reverse polarization) back to -500 mV.7
It is common to explain the potentiodynamic
polarization curves as follows: the higher the current density at a given potential,
the more corrosion prone is the material at that potential. It is also believed
that the more negative the corrosion potential, the more electrochemically
active is the alloy.8"10 In another study,11
it was reported that the breakdown potential of Nitinol orthodontic wire in a saliva-type
solution is relatively higher than for other types of orthodontic wire alloys. In contrast, some investigators have
suggested that the apparent pitting of Nitinol wires during potentiodynamic
polarization is due to the presence of surface defects generated during manufacturing
and not to the effects of corrosion. The flexural properties were evaluated for
both control and corroded Nitinol samples and were found not to be statistically
different. There have been no published studies on the laboratory behavior of
the lately introduced super elastic nickel-titanium wire alloys. It was the
purpose of this investigation to measure and compare the potentiodynamic
corrosion behavior of some Ni-Ti wire alloys.
The six orthodontic wire alloys used in this
investigation are listed in Table 1. These wire types were selected to provide
three brands with known superelastic behavior and three brands which do not
show superelastic behavior. For the potentiodynamic polarization experiments,
the anodic and the cathodic polarizations were obtained by an Aardvark
potentiostat.*
The 0.016 inch diameter wires in a length of 1.5 inches
were used in all cases with exposed area of 0.075 in2. For each
orthodontic alloy, wire electrode segment was prepared by mounting about a 0.5
inch of the cut off wire sample into Epo-Kwick resin. A stainless steel
electrode rod was mounted from the back of the resin holder to achieve an electrical
contact with the embedded wire. The exposed length of wire sample
was abraded with a 600 grit paper and rinsed with acetone immediately before
insertion into the saliva solution. The test segment of investigated wires were
subjected in a stepwise manner to potential differences ranging (a) from -0.6 V
SCE (Saturated Calomel Electrode) to +0.8 V in the forward direction followed
by (b) reverse polarization back to -0.06. The purpose of this cyclic polarization
treatment was to grow then break down films of corrosion products on the
surfaces of the wire samples under highly accelerated conditions. For each
wire, the log of current output (A) was plotted versus the applied potential (V
vs. SCE).
The potential-current profiles of nickel-titanium orthodontic
wire alloys obtained by cyclic polarization are presented in Figures 1 and 2.
The recorded traces for the superelastic wires are shown in Figure 1. During
the forward scan, both Ni-Ti and Nitinol SE remained passive while Sentinol
exhibited breakdown in passitivity at about +0.25 V. In the case of the non-superelastic
wires, Titanal and Orthonol broke down their passitivities around +0.18 V, whereas
Nitinol maintained its passitivity for the entire forward scan up to +0.8 V.
[Fig.2].
Prolonged and effective corrosion resistance is a prime
consideration in materials to be used in the oral cavity. It is well known that
corrosion is the result of a variety of interaction between the material and
the environment. The metallurgical nature of these materials, such as composition,
structure, surface finish and thermal history, controls their corrosion
behavior. The resistance of the original Nitinol nickel-titanium orthodontic
wire alloy to corrosion in artificial saliva and saline solutions has been evaluated
by conducting the potentiodynamic polarization technique.8,11
In general, during the reverse scan for the potentiodynamic
polarization curves, the zero-current potential for all the nickel-titanium
orthodontic wire alloys occurred at a more negative value (-0.1 to -0.25 V)
than the corrosion potential (change from cathodic to anodic sense of the
current) for the forward scan. The initial anodic portions of the forward scan
curves are considered to be associated with the growth of a passive film of
mixed nickel-titanium oxides on the exposed surface. The horizontal portion of
the anodic forward scan is attributed to breakdown of this film with formation
of localized pitting when the potential difference reaches some critical value.
The breakdown of passitivity results approximately in three orders of magnitude
increase in current density during the forward scan, and a corresponding
plateau in the plot is observed during the reversed scan at a lower value of voltage.
This increase in
current density can
be attributed to the change in the geometric surface area of the alloy
resulting from the formation of pits. The change in the zero-current potential
for the reverse scan can be explained by the exposure of the pit-free alloy
surface to the NaCl solution at localized areas associated with the breakdown
of the passive film. These results generally agree with the past observations
from similar electrochemical studies,78" and are consistent
with long-term laboratory and clinical studies.12-13 In the present
investigation, it was assumed that the breakdown of the passive film on the
nickel-titanium orthodontic wire surfaces may also arise from surface defects
generated during the manufacturing processes, along with general effects of
accelerated corrosion.
The potentiodynamic behavior of all investigated Ni-Ti wrought
wire alloys was generally similar. Sentinol, Titanal and Orthonal wires showed
breakdown of passive film during testing. The other three wires remained
passive over the entire range of cyclic voltage used.
The author gratefully acknowledge the valuable assistance
and comments offered by Dr. H.J. Muller, Research Associate, American Dental
Association, Chicago, U.S.A. Miss Thelma Tirad is kindly acknowledged for typing
the manuscript.
-
Tomashov ND, Chernova RE. Passitivity and protection of metals against
corrosion. New York:Plenum
Press, 1967:67.
-
Scully JC. The fundamentals of corrosion. 2nd ed. New York:Pergamon Press,
1975, Chap 2.
-
Ida K, Togaya T, Tsutsumi S, Takeuchi M. Effect of
magnesia investments in the dental casting of pure titanium or titanium alloys.
Dent Mat J 1982;1:8-16.
-
Buehler WJ, Wang FE. A summary of recent research on
the nitinol alloys and their potential application in ocean engineering. Ocean
Engr 1968;1:105-20.
-
Chern Lin JH, Moser JB, Taira M, Greener EH. Cu-Ti,
Co-Ti and Ni-Ti systems: corrosion and microhardness. J Oral Rehabil 1990;17:383-91.
-
Greener EH, Harcourt JK, Lautenschlager EP. Materials
science in dentistry. Baltimore:Williams & Wilkins Co, 1972:352.
-
Sarkar NK, Redmond W, Schwaninger BM, Goldberg AJ. The chloride
corrosion behavior of four orthodontic wires. J Oral
-
. Rehabil
1983;10:121-28.
-
Sarkar NK, Fuys RA, Stanford JW. The chloride corrosion
of low-gold casting alloys. J Dent Res 1979;58:568-75.
-
Chern Lin JH, Lo SJ, Ju CP. Bio-corrosion study of titanium-cobalt
alloys. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22:331-35.
-
Holland RI. Corrosion testing by potentiodynamic
polarization in various electrolytes. Dent Mater 1992;8:241-45.
-
Mueller HJ, Chen CP. Properties of Fe-Cr-Mo wire. J
Dent 1983;11:71-79.
-
Scwaniger BM, Sarkar NK, Foster BE. Effect of long-term
immersion on the flexural properties of nitinol. Am J Orthod 1982;92:45-9.
-
Edie JW, Andreasen GF, Zaytoun MP. Surface corrosion of
nitinol and stainless steel under clinical conditions. Angle Orthod 1981;51:181-92.
-
Machiarelli R. Pre-historic ifish eatersi along the
eastern Arabian coast: Dental variation, morphology and oral health in the Rafs
Al-Hamra community (Qurum, Sultanate of Oman, 5th - 4th millenia BC). Am J Phys
Anthropol 1989;78:575-94.

|