Temporomandibular Dysfunction And The Emotional Status
Of 6-14 Years Old Saudi Female Children
Najat M. A. Farsi, BDS, MS
Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah
Interest in pediatric temporomandibular dysfunction (TMD) is
increasing. Many studies on TMD prevalence among children in Western
countries are available. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of
TMD signs among randomly selected female Saudi children aged 6 to 14
years and to evaluate the effect, if any, of their emotional states on
the development of TMD. The children (n = 696) underwent an examination
which consisted of palpation of temporomandibular joints and associated
musculature for tenderness, determination of the maximal vertical
opening and deviation of the mandible upon opening. Results showed that
17.1% of the children had at least one sign of TMD with joint sounds
being the most frequent sign (13.9%). Restricted mouth opening was
second in frequency (7.6%). Deviation upon opening as well as muscle
tenderness to palpation were found infrequently. The prevalence of TMD
is lower in the Saudi children than in some Caucasian populations. The
results further revealed that children with nervous emotional states
had a greater risk of developing signs of TMD than calm children.
Therefore, it is suggested that emotional factors should be taken in
consideration when treating these children.
Interest in pediatric
temporomandibular dys- function (TMD) is increasing, as younger patients are
being diagnosed and treated for the disorder. Many studies on TMD prevalence in children populations in Western countries are available.1-11
These studies show that the prevalence of TMD seems to vary among different
populations and ethnic groups. The etiology
of TMD in children and adolescents has also been shown to be
multifactorial.1216 Malocclusion, oral parafunctions and emotional states
are the factors mostly investigated in adults.1719 Few
studies reported higher pre- valence of TMD in children with traits of nervousness and anxiety.14-1520
However, the importance of the emotional states in children as an
etiological factor for TMD continues to be an important area of investigation.
In Saudi children, one study is available on the prevalence
of TMD in children with primary dentition.21 There is lack of
information regar- ding prevalence of TMD in the different age groups,
predisposing factors as well as age of onset of TMD. Such information is
important in determining whether early childhood problems can predispose patients to temporomandibular growth
abnormalities. The purposes of this study were to record the prevalence of TMD among
Saudi female children with mixed dentition and to evaluate the relationship between
emotional states and development of TMD in the examined population.
Subjects
Examinations
were performed on 696 Saudi female children
with mixed dentition from age 6 to 14 years. The subjects were collected
from eight girls' primary schools in Jeddah
City. The city was
divided into four geographical areas (North, South, East and West) and two
schools were randomly selected from each area. In each school, four classes
were randomly selected from grades 2 to 6. All the children with mixed
dentition in each class were included in the study.
Examination
The examination and recording were made by three
experienced faculty members. Prior to the study, the examiners were
trained in temporo- mandibular examination criteria of previous studies9-22-23
and calibrated to acceptable levels of reliability for assessing the
variables covered by the examination. All the subjects were examined at the
schools using two chairs. Examination was done while the child was seated
upright during the examination. The clinical examination included the following
aspects:
-
Joint sounds were
recorded by digital pal- pation of the joint using middle and index fingers
while the child was opening and closing her mouth. Joint sounds were recorded
as clicking or crepitus. A stethos- cope was not used due to the high incidence
of false positive responses recorded by the stethoscope.2 When
diffe- rent sounds were detected in each joint, the more progressive sign (crepitus) was assigned
to that subject.
-
Temporomandibular
Joint (TMJ) tenderness during opening and closing of mouth.
-
Muscle
tenderness. Muscles (temporalis, masseter, and sternocleidomastoid) were palpated
bilaterally with two fingers. Pain responses were recorded as present or absent. To avoid uncomfortable procedures, intraoral
muscle palpation was excluded.
-
Maximum
extent of vertical opening was measured, using Boley gauge, from maxillary to mandibular central incisor edges adjacent
to the dental midline. The child was asked to open her mouth as wide as possible
and the movement was repeated twice for
confirmation and the highest value was recorded. The overbite value (mm)
was added to the maximum incisal distance to obtain the maximum opening
distance; while in cases of openbite, the inter-incisal distance value was
subtracted from the measurement. The lower limit for normal opening in this age
group was considered 40 mm.20
-
Deviation of mandible more than 2 mm from the
midline plane during opening was recorded at approximately the midpoint as the
subject opened to the maximum distance.
Questionnaire
After
the examination, a questionnaire was sent to the parents to collect information
regarding psychological qualities of the
children. The parents were asked to classify the children into the
following categories: calm, nervous or not applicable.
The
Chi-Square Test was used for analysis of correlations
and differences between groups for the recorded variables. Fisher Exact
Test was used for comparison whenever the comparable groups have a sample size
smaller than five. P value of < 0.05 was regarded as significant.
Table
1 shows the distribution of different signs of TMD in the examined children. To
make a more meaningful comparison, the children were divided into three groups:
6-8, 9-11 and 12 to 14 years of age. The prevalence of dys- function as
determined by the presence of one or more of the five cardinal signs was 17.1%
in the entire population. The prevalence
increased slightly from the youngest age group (16.6%) to the oldest age
group (18.9%). This difference was not statistically significant.
Joint sounds were the
most prevalent sign among the children. Clicking was overwhel- mingly the most
common joint sound produced by 88 (12.6%) children. Crepitus was detected in 9
(1.3%) children. Although not statistically significant, joint sounds were
observed at a higher frequency in the oldest age group compared to the youngest
age group; and no crepitus was observed in the youngest age group. Restricted mouth opening was second in frequency
(7.6%). The prevalence of this sign showed statistically significant difference
between the youngest (12.9%) and the oldest (5.7%) age groups. (X2=
1.78, df - 2, P=0.03). Joint tenderness was third in frequency. It occurred more
frequently in the oldest age group than in the youngest group. This diffe- rence
was marginally significant (P < 0.06). Deviation upon opening was found
infrequently (2.4%) as was muscle tenderness to palpation (1.0%).
It was not possible to measure the maximal opening for some children who had no
anterior teeth due to normal exfoliation process and they were excluded from
this part of the study. The maximal opening values found ranged from 31 mm to
54 mm with a mean value (±SD)
of 49.1 mm ± 5.2.
The means of maximal opening gradually increased with age as shown in Fig. 1.
After excluding the children with missing anterior teeth (n = 144), restricted opening
was recorded in 7.6% of the remaining sample.
Out of
696 parents who received the questionnaires; only 404 (58%) responded. On the basis
of the responses, the children were divided into two groups: (1) subjects rated
as calm (N = 190), and (2) subjects rated as tense or nervous (N = 208).
Responses from six parents whose answers didnt fall in these two categories
were excluded from the analysis.
Table 2 reveals the distribution of the different
signs of TMD among the two emotional status groups. Using Fisher Exact
Test, the differences in the prevalence of TMJ between the two groups was statistically significant (P = .007).
TMJ tenderness occurs more frequently in the nervous than in the calm
group. Statistically significant differences between the two groups were not
found with respect to other signs of TMD.
The sample
of the present study consisted of randomly selected Saudi female children aged 6-14
years old in the mixed dentition period. While strong differences in the
prevalence of TMD were noted between races,11
most of the studies reported no significant differences in TMD between the sexes.56-1124
Therefore, although the results are
from female subjects only, they can be compared to these previous studies. One
or more signs of TMD were observed in 17.1% of the total sample which is much
lower than the findings of some earlier studies.5'6810
The prevalence of at least one sign increased slightly with age, in agreement with
many of the studies done on different age groups.45 Alamoudi et al21
found a prevalence of 16.5% for TMD in Saudi children with primary dentition. The author's
results of 17.1% therefore suggest an increase in prevalence from primary to
mixed dentition. Morphological changes of the TMJ and jaw development as well as occlusal changes may be responsible for these
observations. TMJ sound were the most frequently
observed sign with significantly more cases in clicking than crepitus.
These results are in accordance with data published by earlier authors.6'710 Sounds
occurred in 13.1% of the younger group and in 15.1% of the older ones. These
results are consistent with that of Williamson1 and Ogura7
(Table 3), are slightly higher than the figures by Nilner2 and
Brandt3 but much lower than Gazit,6 Grosfeld4 and
Kritsineli10 who used a stethoscope to detect joint sound. Dworkin
et al25 used digital palpation and a stethoscope to detect joint sound
and reported that detecting specific joint sound using a stethoscope resulted
in un- acceptable reliability. Okeson and O'Donnell26 in their
temporomandibular evaluation work- shop
considered the use of stethoscope to be of questionable value since it
may magnify insignificant joint sounds.
TMJ tenderness in the present sample is lower than
the reports of the studies, which included samples of older age groups.1-4-6
Limited mouth opening was recorded in 7.6% of the present sample in which 40 mm was considered the lower limit of maximal opening for children with mixed
dentition as suggested by Okeson and
O'Donnell.26 The prevalence of restricted opening in the present
study is relatively high in comparison to the studies that considered 35
mm as the lower limit.2-4'10
The average mea- surement of the amplitude of opening (49.1 mm) is
relatively lower than the average data of the same age group published by Grosfeld4 (51. 8mm) and Vanderas15
(54.8 mm). Restricted opening was significantly more apparent among the
younger age group than the older one which
could be due to inability of children younger than 8 years old to open
as wide as the older ones. Therefore, for this age group (6-8 years) the lower
limit of physiologic function could be
placed at 35 mm.
The recording of deviation on opening was recorded at
approximately the midpoint of maximal opening since some children open with
their mandible following S-shaped trajectories and yet reach the maximal
opening in an undeviated position.22
In the present investigation, this sign of dysfunction occurred less
than what other studies reported earlier. (Table 3)
Several
authors reported that psychological stressors cause increased muscle activity
and that TMD patients respond to stressors with increased and prolonged
masticatory muscle tension.2729 This study showed statistically significant
differences in the prevalence of TMJ tenderness between the calm and nervous children. The present findings agree closely with that reported by
Vanderas.15 The fact that no statistically significant
differences related to TMJ sounds or dysfunction in the mandibular movement were found between the two groups might
be explained by the mechanisms through which the emotional factors act
on the masticatory system. It is suggested
that pain and dysfunction arise from increased muscle tension caused by
emotional factors.30-31 The tender- ness among the nervous
group in this study might not be severe
enough to cause deflection of the mandible or restriction of the
mandibular movements. Furthermore, high adaptability of the masticatory system
of the young children could mask the development of other signs of dysfunction among the nervous group.
The results
of this study showed that the prevalence of TMD among female Saudi chil- dren
is relatively lower than in Western children with joint sound being the most
frequent sign. The present findings also suggest that children in emotional states run a greater risk of deve- loping
TMD signs.
-
Williamson EH. Temporomandibular dysfunction in pre-treatment adolescent patients. Am J Ortho 1977;72:429-433.
-
Nilner M and Lassing SA. Prevalence of func- tional
disturbances and diseases of the stomatognathic system in 7-14 year olds. Swed Dent
J 1981;5:173-87.
-
Brandt J. Temporomandibular disorders and their association
with morphologic malocclusion in children in developmental aspects of TMJ disorders,
Carlson DS et al. Eds, monograph 16, Craniofacial Growth Series, Ann Arbor;
University of Michigan, 1985,279-88.
-
Grosfeld O, Jackowska M and Czarnecka B. Results of
epidemiological examinations of the temporo- mandibular joint in adolescents
and young adults. J Oral Rehab 1985;12:95-105.
-
Egermark-Eriksson I, Carlsson GE and Ingervall B. Prevalence
of mandibular dysfunction and orofacial parafunction in 7-, 11-and 15-year old Swedish
children. Eur J of Orthod 1981; 3:163-72
-
Gazit E, Lieberman M, Eini R and Hirsch N et al. Prevalence
of mandibular dysfunction in 10 to 18-year-old Israeli schoolchildren. J Oral
Rehabil 1984; 11:307-17.
-
Ogura T, Morinushi T, Ohno H and Sumi K et al. An
epidemiological study of TMJ dysfunction syndrome in adolescents. J Pedod
1985;10:22-35.
-
Bernal M and Tsamtsouris A. Signs and symptoms of TMJ
dysfunction in 3 to 5-year -old children. J Pedod 1986;10:127-40.
-
Goho C and Jones HL. Association between pri- mary
dentition wear and clinical temporo- mandibular dysfunction signs. Pediatr Dent
1991;13:263-66.
-
Kritsineli M and Shim YS. Malocclusion, body posture
and temporomandibular disorder in children with primary and mixed dentition. J
Clin Ped Dent 1992;16:86-93.
-
Widmalam SE, Christiansen RL, Gunn SM and Hawley LM.
Prevalence of signs and symptoms of craniomandibular disorders and orofacial parafunction
in 4-6 year old African, American and Caucasian children. J Oral Rehabil 1995; 22:87-93
-
Egermark-Eriksson I, Ingervall B and Carlsson GE. The
dependence of mandibular dysfunction in children on functional and morphologic malocclusion.
Am J Orthod 1983; 83:187-94.
-
Egermark-Eriksson I, Carlsson GE and Magnusson T. A
longitudinal study on malocclusion in relation to signs and symptoms of cranio-
mandibular disorders in children and adole- scents. Eur J Orthod
1990;12:399-407.
-
Vanderas AP. An epidemiologic approach to the etiologic
factors of craniomandibular dysfunc- tion in children and adolescents. The host
agent model. J Craniomand Pract 1988;6:172-178.
-
Vanderas AP. Prevalence of craniomandibular dysfunction
in white children with different emotional states. Part Mi. A comparative
study. J Dent Child 1992;59:23-27.
-
Vanderas AP. Relationship between cranio- mandibular
dysfunction in children and adolescents: A review. Pediatr Dent 1993; 15:317-22.
-
Perry HT, Lammie GA and Main J. Occlusion in a stress
situation. J Am Dent Assoc 1960; 60:626- 633.
-
Mohlin B, Ingervall B and Thilander B. Relation between
malocclusion and mandibular dysfunction in Swedish men. Eur J Orthod 1980;2:229-38.
-
Parker MW. A dynamic model of etiology in temporomandibular
disorders. JADA 1990; 120:283-90.
-
Egermark-Eriksson I. Mandibular dysfunction in children
and individuals with dual bite. Swed Dent J 1982; Supp 10.
-
Alamoudi N, Farsi N, Salako N and Feteih R. Temporomandibular
disorders among school children in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Accepted for publication
in J Clinical Ped Dent.
-
Gross A and Gale EN. Prevalence study of the clinical
signs associated with mandibular dysfunction. J Am Dent Assoc 1983; 107:
932-36.
-
Adair SM and Hecht C. Association of genera- lized
joint hypermobility with history, signs and symptoms of temporomandibular joint
dysfunction in children. Pediatr
Dent 1993;15:323-26.
-
Nilner M. Relationships between oral para- functions
and functional disturbances and diseases of the stomatognathic system among children
aged 7-14 years. Acta Odontol Scand 1983;41:167-172.
-
Dworkin SF, Kimberly HH, Le Resche L and Vonkroff M et
al. Epidemiology of signs and symptoms in temporomandibular disorders. Clinical
signs in cases and control JADA 1990;120:273-81.
-
Okeson JP and O'DonnellJ. Temporomandibular disorders
in children. Pediatr Dent 1989;11:325- 29.
-
Haber JD, Moss RA, Kuczmierczyk AR and Garrett JC.
Assessment and treatment of stress in myofascial pain-dysfunction syndrome: a
model for analysis. J Oral Rehabil 1983;10:187-96.
-
Yemm R. A neurophysiological approach to the pathology
and etiology of temporomandibular dysfunction. J Oral Rehabil 1985;12:343-53.
-
Dahlstrom L. Electromyographic studies of cranio- mandibular
disorders: a review of the literature. J Oral Rehabil 1989;16:1-20.
-
Yemm R. Neurophysiologic studies of temporo- mandibular
joint dysfunction. Oral Sci Rev 1976;1:31-53.
-
Rugh
JD and Soldberg WK. Phsychological impli- cations in temporomandibular pain and
dysfunction. Oral Sci Rev 1976;1:3-20.

|