• JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator

ISSN (Print) 1013-9052
EISSN 1658-3558

The Saudi Dental Journal,
P.O. Box 52500,
Riyadh 11563,
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Tel.
966-1-467-7328
Fax.
933-1-467-7308 /
966-1-467-7534
Email
saudidj@ksu.edu.sa

The effect of tetracycline hydrochloride on the smear layer
formed by various root planing modalities: A scanning
electron microscopy study
 

 Nadir Babay, DDS, MS, DESM
Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University,PO BOX 60169, Riyadh 11545

 

Abstract 

 

The purpose of the present study was to examine the smear layer formation following different root planing modalities and its removal using tetracycline hydrochloride. Thirty-two periodontitis involved human teeth were randomly divided into 8 groups of 4 each.  

 

Groups 1 & 2 were root planed with hand instrument (Gracey 11/12) while in groups 3 & 4, aflat diamond bur was used. In groups 5 & 6, the roots were scaled with a piezoelectric unit (Piezon) while in groups 7 & 8, a magnetostrlctive unit (Amdent) was used. Sixteen teeth (two in each group) were conditioned with tetracycline hydrochloride for 3 minutes while the other sixteen teeth were not conditioned and served as controls. The surfaces were examined by a scanning electron microscope. The results showed that root planing resulted in a smear covering the root surfaces, irrespective of the treatment modality. Tetracycline hydrochloride efficiently removed the smear layer with collagen fibers exposed to varying degrees.
 

Introduction

 

One of the objectives of periodontal therapy is to convert the periodontitis affected root surface into a substrate which is biologically hospitable for epithelial and connective tissues cell adherence and attachment.1-2

Methods to achieve this objective have included scaling and root planing,3 as well as treatment with various chemicals and antimicrobial agents.45

Hand or ultrasonic scaling of root surfaces always produces a non-biocompatible smear layer.6 Conventionally, this smear layer has been removed with citric acid at low pH etchant.7 However, citric acid has recently been shown to interfere with wound healing because of its low pH.8


In vitro studies on the effects of tetracycline hydrochloride on dentin have revealed properties which may be beneficial in periodontal reconstructive therapy. Surface demineralization with tetracycline enhances binding of matrix proteins to dentin and stimulates fibroblast attachment and growth.9     Furthermore, topical tetracycline is absorbed to and subsequently desorbed from dentin maintaining antimicrobial activity for at least 14 days.10 Such substantivity may be beneficial since tetracycline has been shown to inhibit mammalian neutrophil collagenase and in vitro bone resorption.11  These findings have led to the widespread use of tetracycline treatment of root surfaces in periodontal surgery.


The purpose of this study was to evaluate the smear layer removal and collagen exposure capacity of tetracycline hydrochloride applied to root surfaces treated by different root planing modalities.


Materials and Methods

 

Thirty-two periodontally involved human teeth scheduled for extraction were used in this study. All teeth had lost more than two-thirds of their radiographic attachment or had severe through and through furcation defects (Fig. 1). Following extraction, the border between the healthy and diseased root surfaces was marked with a small dental bur. Only the diseased part of the root surface was used in the study. The teeth were randomly divided into 8 groups of 4 each. The diseased root surfaces of the teeth in groups 1 and 2 were root planed with hand instrument (Gracey 11/12, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, USA) while the root surfaces in groups 3 and 4 were root planed with a flat diamond bur (Periotest, Philadelphia, USA). The root surface in groups 5 and 6 were ultrasonically scaled with a Piezon (Piezon, EMS Switzerland) while the root surfaces in group 7 and 8 were root planed with another ultrasonic (Amdent 830, Sweden).

Piezon is a piezoelectric unit where the pattern of vibration of the tip is linear meaning that only the two sides of the tip are active. Amdent is a magnetostrictive unit where the pattern of vibration of the tip is elliptical.12 The specimens were prepared in the following manner. Calculus covering the specimen was removed. Attention was paid to avoid over-instrumenting or gouging the underlying root surface.

Following root planing, the teeth in groups 2,4,6 and 8 were immersed in a solution of tetracycline hydrochloride (pH 1.8) for 3 minutes. These groups served as experimental groups, while the teeth in groups 1, 3,5 and 7 received no tetracycline hydrochloride and served as controls (Table 1).

Freshly made tetracycline solution was used. The tetracycline Hcl was prepared by slowly adding pure tetracycline (Spimaco, Qassim, Saudi Arabia) into distilled water until a saturated solution of 0.5%g/ml was obtained with constant stirring at 37°C for 10 minutes. This gave a pH 1.8 solution when checked with a pH meter. A magnetic stirrer was used to mix the solution.

After acid conditioning, specimens were rinsed for 3 minutes with distilled water. All specimens were prepared for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in the following way. After fixation, dehydration was performed in a graded series of ethanol with 100 % acetone as a final step. The teeth were mounted on aluminium stubs and sputter coated13 with a gold palladium alloy to a thickness of 10nm. All teeth were examined in the scanning electron microscope (Jeol, Japan), operated between 20 and 25 kv and with a tilt- angle of between 0 and 30 degrees.

The roots were examined with respect to the presence or absence of the smear layer and to exposed collagen fibers. Open dentinal tubuli on the root surface were a criteria for the efficacy of the smear-layer removing capacity of the treatment as advocated by Poison et al.7


Results

 

Smear Layer

SEM examination of control, root planed, non- conditioned specimens showed an irregular, amorphous surface which correspond to a smear layer. No differences in root surface texture following the four treatment modalities were observed. No open dentinal tubuli could be seen. Following ultrasonic scaling with either Piezon or Amdent, the root surface revealed a wave like appearance with presence of debris (Fig. 2), while the root surfaces treated manually or with a bur showed  a  smoother  surface   interrupted   by longitudinal grooves (Fig. 3).

The effect of tetracycline hydrochloride treatment on diseased root surface after all four treatment modalities is illustrated in Figs. 4 & 5. Etching with tetracycline for 3 minutes removed most of the smear layer from the root planed surfaces in all four treatment modalities. Little or no variations in the presence or absence of smear layer could be detected following the different root planing and etching modalities. All specimens exhibited distinct areas of patent dentinal tubules.

Collagen

Fibrous structures were evident after root conditioning. Surfaces scaled with- ultrasonic displayed intertubular surfaces covered by a fibrous meshwork with fibers extending into patent dentinal tubules (Fig. 6). The root surfaces treated manually or with a bur showed fewer and less well defined structures (Fig. 7).


Discussion


Complete mechanical removal of dental calculus and contaminated cementum is not a realistic objective in periodontal therapy.14 Consequently, additional methods to detoxify the root surface such as etching has been recommended.15 By definition, etching involves selective removal of parts or components from a solid surface through the action of etching agents such as solution of acid and other substances like tetracycline hydrochloride. Etching does not, however, imply erosion of the surface or removal of a complete surface layer. Etching performed on a root surface during periodontal surgery thus aims at selectively removing mineral and associated bacterial toxins, leaving an exposed layer of collagen.

The results presented in this study are in accordance with those of earlier studies that have found that root planing with hand instruments or burs always results in the formation of a smear layer.6-7 When a piezoelectric unit (Piezon) and a magnetostrictive unit were used for root planning, the smear layer in all specimens were found to cover the root planed surfaces (Fig. 2). This is in accord with Hanes et al16 who reported that periodontitis affected teeth ultrasonically scaled appeared slightly altered showing a faint mat-like texture following a 5-minute tetracycline Hcl or citric acid exposure. The tetracycline Hcl and citric solutions produced comparable morphologic characteristics. However, another study claimed that the smear layer has been removed by the ultrasonic treatment.17 These contradictory results may be explained by differences in the working principles among ultrasonic scalers, although it seems unlikely that a smear layer with its content of hydrophobic substances can be entirely removed by water irrigation.

The wave-like appearance of the root surfaces following ultrasonic scaling may be explained by the more gentle effect exerted by the scaler to the root surface compared to hand instrument and burs.18 Following etching with tetracycline hydrochloride for 3 minutes, the smear layer was practically non-existent. In addition to removing the smear layer, tetracycline hydrochloride also enlarged or widened the tubule orifice due to preferential demineralization of the peritubular dentin.1920

Dentin surface conditioning with tetracycline hydrochloride has also been shown to influence in vivo fibroblast attachment and fibroaction binding to  tetracycline  or  minocycline  treated  dentin surfaces.21

Discrepancies in reported demineralizing effect may relate to the degree of mineralization,22 nature and concentration of the conditioning agent,23 application mode and interval24 or a combination of these factors. The presence of a hypermineralized surface layer or periodontitis affected roots has been assessed by microradiography.25 Hypermineralization appears limited to the superficial 35 to 50 urn of the root surface. Root surface conditioning has been shown to demineralize the root to a depth of 3 to 12 urn.26 However, ultrasonic scaling has been reported to result in a loss of root substance varying from 12 to 86 urn.27 Therefore it is not unrealistic to assume that our cementum speci- mens exhibited normal mineral content and crystal structure and that observed surface altera- tions may not necessarily relate to periodontitis affected cementum. These observations may suggest that instrumentation of pathologically altered root cementum, while not extensively removing root structure is necessary to enhance the demineralizing effect of the acid.

In this study, root associated collagen fibers were exposed to varying degrees following etching (Figs. 6 & 7). This was observed in all of the etched groups irrespective of root planing modality. The piezon scaled group displayed more fiber-like structure. This can be explained by the erosive nature of the cavitational activity created by ultrasonic scaling.28 Root surfaces that had less exposed collagen had probably a higher mineral content and the etching therefore had less effect on the surface in relation to exposure time. However, the biochemical and morphological changes in the root surface produced by the various mechanical techniques and chemical agent used for root surface preparation are poorly understood. A clear understanding of the effects of the methods of root surface preparation and conditioning is essential if one hopes to be able to consistently convert the periodontitis affected root surface into a substrate which is biologically hospitable to epithelial and connective tissue cell adherence and attachment.


Conclusion

 

Based on the findings of this in vitro study, the following conclusions can be drawn:

  1. Irrespective of the treatment modality, root planing resulted in a smear layer covering the root surface.
  2. Tetracycline   hydrochloride   applied   for   3 minutes efficiently removed the smear layer.
  3. Collagen   fibers  were  exposed  to  varying degrees   following   conditioning   with tetracycline hydrochloride.

Acknowledgement

 

This paper (NF-1646) is registered with the College of Dentistry, Research Center (CDRC)
 

References

 

  1. Stahl SS and Froum S. Human clinical and histological repair responses following the use of citric acid in periodontal therapy. J Periodontol 1977; 48:261-266.
  2. Poison AM and Caton J. Factors influencing periodontal repair and regeneration. J Periodontol 1982;53:617-626.
  3. JonesWAand O'LearyTJ. The effectiveness of in vivo root planing in removing bacterial endotoxin from the roots of periodontally involved teeth. J Periodontol 1978; 49:337-342.
  4. Daly CG. Antibacterial effect of citric acid treatment of periodontally diseased root surfaces in vitro. J Clin Periodontol 1982; 9:386-392.
  5. WikesjbUME, Baker PJ, Christersson LA, Genco RJ, Lyall RM, Hie S, DiFlorio RM and Terranova VP. A biochemical approach to periodontal regeneration: Tetracycline treatment conditions dentin surfaces. J Periodont Res 1986; 21:322-329.
  6. Blomlof J, Blomlof L and Lindskog S. Smear layer formed by different root planing modalities and its removal by an EDTA gel preparation. Int J Periodont  Res Dent 1997;17:3-9.
  7. Poison AM, Frederick GT, Ladenheim S and Hanes PJ. The production of a root surface smear layer by instrumentation and its removal by citric acid. J Periodontol 1984; 55:443-446.
  8. Blomlof J and Lindskog S. Periodontal tissue vitality after different etching modalities. J Clin Periodontol 1995; 22:464-468.
  9. Terranova VP, Franzetti LC, Hie S, DiFlorio RM, Lyall RM, Wikesjo UME, Baker PJ, Christersson LA and Genco RJ. A biochemical approach to periodontal regeneration: Tetracycline treatment of dentin promotes fibroblast adhesion and growth. J Periodont Res 1986; 21:330-337.
  10. Stabholz A, Kettering J and Apreiso R. Antimicrobial properties of human dentin impregnated with tetracycline Hcl or Chlorhexidine: An in vivo study. J Clin Periodontol 1993; 20:557-562.
  11. Golub LM, Ramamurthy N and McNamara TF. Tetracycline inhibits tissue collagenase activity. A new mechanism in the treatment of periodontol disease. J Periodont Res 1984; 19:651-655.
  12. Wilkins EM. Clinical practice of the dental hygienist. 7th ed. Baltimore   Williams & Wilkins, 1994:494-504.
  13. Echlin P. Sputter coating techniques for scanning electron microscope. Scanning Electron Microsc 1975;7:1019-1028.
  14. O'Leary TJ and Kafrawy AH. Total cementum removal: A realistic objective? J Periodontol 1983; 54:221-226.
  15. LowenGuth RA and Blieden TM. Periodontal regeneration root surface demineralization. Periodontology 20001993; 1:54-68.
  16. Hanes PJ, O'Brien NJ and GarnickJJ. A morphological comparison of radicular dentin following root planing and treatment with citric acid or tetracycline Hcl. J Clin Periodontol 1991; 18:660-668.
  17. Higashi T and Okamoto H. The effect of ultrasonic irrigation before and after citric acid treatment on collagen fibril exposure: An in vitro SEM study. J Periodontol 1995; 66:887-891.
  18. Jacobson L, Blomlof J and Lindskog S. Root surface texture after different scaling modalities. Scand J Dent Res 1994; 102:156-160.
  19. Tronstad L. Ultrastructural observations on human coronal dentin. Scand J Dent Res 1973; 81: 101- 111.
  20. Hanes PJ, Poison AM and Frederick GT. Root and pulpal dentin after surface demineralization. Endod & Dent Trauma 1987; 2:190-195.
  21. Rompen EH, Kohl J, Nusgens B and Lapiere CM. Kinetic aspects of gingival and periodontal ligament fibroblast attachment to surface conditioned dentin. J Dent Res 1993; 72:607-612.
  22. Ratcliff PA. An analysis of repair systems in periodontol therapy. J West Soc Periodontol Abstr 1966; 14:57.
  23. Willey R and Steinberg AD. Scanning electron microscopic studies of root dentin surfaces treated with citric acid, elastase, hyaluronidase, pronase and collagenase. J Periodontol 1984; 55: 592-596.
  24. Register AA and Burdick FA. Accelerated reattach- ment with cementogenesis to dentin, demineralized in situ. I. Optimal range. J Perio- dontol 1975; 46:646-655.
  25. Selvig KA and Zander HA. Chemical analysis and microradiography of cementum and dentin from periodontally diseased human teeth. J Periodontol 1962;33:303-310.
  26. Ririe CM, Crigger M and Selvig KA. Healing of periodontal connective tissue following surgical wounding and application of citric acid in dogs. J Periodont Res 1980; 15:314-327.
  27. Ritz K, Hefti AF and Rateitschak KH. An in vitro investigation on the loss of root substance in scaling with various instruments. J Clin Periodontol 1991; 18: 643-647.
  28. Walmsley AD, Welsh TF, Laird WRE and Williams AR. Effects of cavitational activity on the root surface of teeth during ultrasonic scaling. J Clin Periodontol 1990;77:306-312.

Tables

 


157-1


157-2


157-3


158-1


158-2

158-3

 
Website designed and maintained by DeltaCAS