• JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator

ISSN (Print) 1013-9052
EISSN 1658-3558

The Saudi Dental Journal,
P.O. Box 52500,
Riyadh 11563,
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Tel.
966-1-467-7328
Fax.
933-1-467-7308 /
966-1-467-7534
Email
saudidj@ksu.edu.sa

Clinical effects of chlorhexidine, sanguinarine and saline as

coolants during ultrasonic scaling on gingivitis in orthodontic patients

     

Nadir Babay, DDS, MS, DCD
Mohammed T. Bukhary, BDS, DOrth.RCS, M Orth, RCS (Edin), MDORCPS (Gias) MOrthRCS (Lond), PhD
College of Dentistry, KingSaud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

 

Abstract 

 

This clinical investigation examined the effect of chlorhexidine, sanguinarine and saline as coolants during ultrasonic scaling on gingivitis in orthodontic patients. Eighteen females with gingivitis participated in this study. Plaque Index (PI), Gingival Index (Gl), Interdental Bleeding Index (Bl) and Probing Depth (PD) were recorded for the following teeth 16, 21, 25, 36, 41 and 45 at baseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks respectively. The application of solutions (chlorhexidine, sanguinarine and saline) as coolants was delivered by the use of an ultrasonic handpiece (Piezon) in each group consisting of 6 patients. A reduction of the PI, Gl, Bl and PD was observed in all three groups. Irrigation with chlorhexidine, sanguinarine and saline as coolants respectively is an effective clinical procedure during ultrasonic scaling in orthodontic patients with gingivitis.

 
Introduction

 

Ultrasonic scalers appear to be as effective as hand instruments in reducing probing depths and bleeding scores,1,2 removing subgingival plaque3 and establishing a subgingival microflora consistent with periodontal health.4

Orthodontic patients especially adolescents, often show ineffective plaque control, because of difficulties in performing oral hygiene with fixed orthodontic appliances in place.5,6

Gingivitis together with gingival hyperplasia is often observed during orthodontic treatment.7 These pathologic changes reflect the onset of a destructive process in the periodontium.8 Numerous studies suggested the use of chlorhexidine mouthrinse in managing this destructive process. It has a favorable effect on plaque control and inflammation. Chlorhexidine in the form of mouthrinse9 or subgingival irrigant7 has been shown to be useful adjunct in plaque control for patient with fixed orthodontic appliances.

In vivo studies have shown that sanguinarine was effective in reducing plaque formation and retarding the development of gingivitis.10 The effect of a single subgingival irrigation of chlorhexidine, sanguinarine or saline on gingivitis in orthodontics patients was a reduction of the plaque index and probing depth by any of the three solutions.11 A clinical and microbiological comparison of the effects of chlorhexidine and water as coolants during ultrasonic scaling and root planing has shown a slight adjunctive effect for chlorhexidine in the reduction of pocket depth.12 However, the effect on gingivitis of chlorhexidine, sanguinarine and saline as coolants during ultrasonic scaling in orthodontics patients has not been reported.

Therefore, the present study was designed to test the efficacy of chlorhexidine, sanguinarine and saline as coolants during ultrasonic irrigation on gingivitis in orthodontic patients over a 4-week period.

Materials and Methods

 

Patient Selection

Subjects for this study were selected from the Division of Orthodontics at King Saud University, College of Dentistry. Eighteen female subjects qualified on the basis of the following criteria.

1.    Must be aged 12 to 18 years and currently undergoing full banded straight wire (Edgewise) treatment with bracket on the anterior teeth and bands on their molars.

2.    Existing gingivitis as assessed by bleeding on probing, with no evidence of periodontitis.

3.    No known hypersensitivity to chlorhexidine, sanguinarine or saline.

4.    Good medical health.

5.    No antibiotics taken in the preceding two months.

Preparations

The three commercial preparations used were chlorhexidine containing 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate (Corsodyl ICI, Maccelesfield UK), sanguinarine (Viadent Fort Collins, Colorado, USA), containing 0.3% sanguinarine extract and zinc chloride and saline (Pharmaceutical Solution Industries Ltd., Jeddah, Saudi Arabia) containing 0.9% sodium chloride.

In order to ensure that the investigators would remain blind to the solution used, all three solutions were flavored and colored identically at the School of Pharmacy, King Saud University except for the active ingredient chlorhexidine, sanguinarine and saline.

Randomization and distribution of the test solutions were done by a hygienist, independently of the investigators. Each solution was given a code name and not revealed until the end of the study. At no time did the investigators know that the test solutions were being used as coolants.

Clinical Procedures

Six index teeth which had been used as reliable indicators for the various regions of the mouth were used.13 They were teeth no. 16, 21, 25, 36,41 and 45. The following parameters were recorded at baseline (day 0), 2 weeks (day 14) and 4 weeks (day 28 ) on each of the teeth: Plaque Index14 (PI); Gingival Index15 (Gl) and Interdental Bleeding lndex16(BI).

Probing depth (PD) (mm) was measured with a Michigan periodontal probe (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, III, USA) with a tip diameter of 0.45 mm.

Following the examination, the patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups each consisting of 6 individuals. All measurements were done by a single operator (NB) who was calibrated prior to the study.

A pilot study of 10 subjects revealed a high reliability of measurement. The application of the three solutions as coolants was delivered by the use of an ultrasonic Piezon handpiece (Piezon Master 400, EMS, Switzerland). Piezon is a piezo electric ultrasonic device oscillating at 25000 vps with a straight horizontal action. It comes with a 300 ml detachable plastic bottle which serves as container for any of the solutions used in the study. Each coolant was delivered to the ultrasonic handpiece via separate bottles.

The mouth was instrumented with the ultrasonic hand piece. This was done twice, each time starting with the container full of coolant until emptied. The procedure was done for each patient and lasted twenty minutes.

Patients had previously received oral hygiene instructions and they continued their usual oral hygiene procedures throughout the study. No additional attempts were made to improve the patient's oral hygiene.

Statistical analysis

The data were entered into the microcomputer using FOXPRO (Window Ver 3.0). The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS Ver. 7.5) was utilized for statistical computations. Repeated measure three-way ANOVA was employed to determine the differences between visits, different types of teeth and solutions.
 
Results

 

All eighteen patients completed all the visits. No patient reported adverse reaction or side effects to any of the three solutions used in the ultrasonic handpiece.

The overall differences for plaque index, gingival index, interdental bleeding index and the probing depth between baseline and day 14; and baseline and day 28 were found to be significant (p< 0.0001) (Table 1).

Plaque index, gingival index, interdental bleeding, and probing depth all showed a significant decrease from day 0 to day 28 (Table 1). When the clinical effects of chlorhexidine, sanguinarine and saline were compared, there were no significant differences. The results are summarized in Table 2. Figs. 1 to 4 show the mean indices, respectively, between day 0 and day 28 following treatments with the solutions.

In the case of plaque index, gingival index and probing depth, all differences over time were within one unit of measurement. Plaque index decreased   from   0.92   to  0.49;   gingival   index decreased from 1.13 to 0.58 and the probing depth decreased from 2.83 to 1.54 over the same interval). The measure of the interdental bleeding index, however, decreased from near unity (0.83) to near zero (0.22), a more meaningful clinical achievement than in the other three measures.

Discussion

 

The present study was designed to evaluate the clinical effects of chlorhexidine, sanguinarine and saline as coolants for ultrasonic scaling on gingivitis in orthodontic patients. The anti-plaque quality of chlorhexidine had been demonstrated previously.9 Sanguinarine antimicrobial properties against plaque forming bacteria had also been established.17 Subgingival irrigation with either chlorhexidine or saline in patients with periodontitis had been shown to be effective in reducing the pockets with chlorhexidine solution found to be the most effective.18 Also, chlorhexidine used as a coolant during ultrasonic scaling had a slight adjunctive effect over water in the reduction of pocket depth when used as coolant for the treatment of chronic periodontitis.12

The results of this study showed no difference in outcome among the three solutions. The repeated measures consistently indicated an absence of difference between the solutions (Table 2). The reduction of PI, Gl, Bl and PD took piace regardless of whether the teeth had been treated with chlorhexidine, sanguinarine or saline as the coolant during ultrasonic scaling. The changes observed in the plaque and gingival indices did not appear to represent a clinically significant reduction or increase in plaque and gingival levels. This could be because no attempt was made to improve the patient's supragingival plaque control throughout the study, although they had oral hygiene instructions and were told to continue their usual oral hygiene procedures throughout the study.

Studies involving patients with frequent supragingival irrigation with chlorhexidine have shown the solution to be effective in reducing plaque in patients with gingivitis.19 Dilute solutions of sanguinarine delivered via rinsing or supragingival irrigation were also shown to be effective in controlling plaque as an additional benefit to the use of supragingival irrigation to control gingivitis in humans.20

The small size of the differences actually observed between groups in this study suggested the true absence of a meaningful treatment (therapeutic) effect. The slight reduction in probing depth seen at two and four weeks could have resulted from variations in the probing technique and also from a reduction in gingival inflammation. The initial shallow probing depths would tend to limit the amount of probing depth reduction expected to occur. However, in-patients with deeper periodontal pockets, frequent subgingival irrigations with chlorhexidine have resulted in significant pocket reduction.21

The statistically significant reduction in this study of the interdental bleeding index with all three solutions used has clinical significance. The reduction occurred over a 4-week period and the index decreased significantly. A longer period of observation would allow a better estimate of extinction of the effect. This will offer the chance to see how long it would take for the gingiva to return to baseline condition and determine whether there is a treatment effect over 4 weeks. The reduction in bleeding index after 4 weeks on patients with gingivitis with the different solutions as coolant suggested that the effect could be the result of the ultrasonic irrigation on the supra and subgingival plaque and independent of the solution used.

The results of this study showed that a single visit treatment with ultrasonic irrigation with chlorhexidine, sanguinarine or saline could effectively reduce the inflammation of the interdental papilla on gingivitis in orthodontic patients. The effect of reduced inflammation was over a 4 week period which frequently coincides with scheduled orthodontic appointments during active treatment. This would conveniently allow for repeated treatments at specific interproximal sites that are difficult for plaque control and are the most severely affected by inflammation in orthodontic patients.

The concept of a chemical solution to enhance oral health has long been considered and the importance of such a solution is even greater in orthodontic patients with established gingivitis. Chlorhexidine, sanguinarine and saline as coolant during ultrasonic irrigation may represent an important therapeutic agent in controlling gingival inflammation, gingival bleeding and plaque accumulation. The effect on these clinical parameters was achieved when they were used over a 4 week period.
 
Recommendations

 

  1. Ultrasonic irrigation with a solution of chlorhexidine,   sanguinarine or saline as coolant reduced significantly the interdental bleeding index.
  2. There was no difference between chlorhexidine, sanguinarine and saline when used as coolants during ultrasonic irrigation in orthodontics patients with gingivitis.
  3. Ultrasonic irrigation with chlorhexidine, sanguinarine or saline as coolant was an effective procedure that could be performed monthly on orthodontic patients

Acknowledgement

 

This paper (NF-1456) is registered with the College of Dentistry, Research Center (CDRC).
The authors wish to thank Dr. Nazeer Khan for his assistance in the statistical analysis.


References

 

  1. Badersten A, Nilveus R and Egelberg J. Effect of nonsurgical periodontal therapy. (I) Moderately advanced periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 1981; 8: 57-72.
  2. Badersten A, Nilveus R and Egelberg J. Effect of nonsurgical periodontal therapy. (II) Severely advanced periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 1984a;11: 63-76.
  3. Thornton S and Garnick J. Comparison of ultrasonic to hand instrument on the removal of subgingival plaque. J Periodontol 1982; 53:35-37.
  4. Oosterwaal PJM, Matee Ml, Mikx FHM, Vant Hofma and Renggli HH. The effect of subgingival debridement with hand and ultrasonic instruments on the subgingival microflora. J Clin Periodontol 1980;7:300-308.
  5. Boyd RL Longitudinal evaluation of a system for self-monitoring plaque control effectiveness in orthodontic patients. J Clin Periodontol 1983; 10: 380-388.
  6. Brightman LJ, Terezhalmy GT, Greenwell H, Jacob M and Enlow DH. The effect of 0.12 % chlorhexidine fluconate mouth rinse on orthodontic patients age 11 through 17 with established gingivitis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1991; 100:324-228.
  7. Morrow D, Wood DP and Speechley M. Clinical effect of subgingival chlorhexidine irrigation on gingivitis in adolescent orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992; 101:408-413.
  8. Diamanti-Kipioti A, Gusberti FA and Lang NP. Clinical and microbiological effects of fixed orthodontic appliances. J Clin Periodontol 1987; 14:326-333.
  9. Anderson GB, Bowden J, Morrison EC and Caffesse RG. Clinical effects of chlorhexidine mouthwashes on patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1997; 111:606-612.
  10. Wennstrom J and Lindhe. Some effects of a sanguinarine containing mouth rinse on developing plaque and gingivitis. J Clin Periodontol 1985; 12: 867-872.
  11. Babay N and Aljasser N. Subgingival irrigation effects of chlorhexidine or sanguinarine on gingivitis in orthodontic patients. J Clin Pediar Dent 1996;20:225-228.
  12. Taggart JA, Palmer RM and Wilson RF. A Clinical and microbiological comparison of the effects of water and 0.02% chlorhexidine as coolants during ultrasonic scaling and root planing. J Clin Periodontol 1990;17:32-37.
  13. Ramfjord SP. Indices for prevalence and incidence of periodontal disease. J Periodontol 1951; 30:51-54.
  14. Sillness J and Loe. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. Acta Odont Scandinavia 1964;22:121-135.
  15. Loe. The gingival index, the plaque index and the retention index systems. J Periodontol 1967; 38:610-616.
  16. Caton J and Poison A. The interdental bleeding index: A simplified procedure for monitoring gingival health. Comp Cont Educ Dent 1985; 6 : 88-92.
  17. Dzink HL, Socransky SS, Boulware RT and Soutoard GL. Comparative in vitro activity of sanguinarine against oral microbial isolates. IADR Abstract No. 340,1985.
  18. McAlpine R, Magnusson I, Kiger R, Crigger N, Garett S and Egelberg J. Antimicrobial irrigation of deep pocket to supplement oral hygiene instruction and root debridement. J Clin Periodontol 1985; 12: 568-577.
  19. FlemmingTF, Newman MG, Doherty FM, Grossman E, Mechel AH and Bakdash MB. Supragingival irrigation with 0.06% chlorhexidine in naturally occuring gingivitis. I, 6 months clinical observations. J Periodontol 1990; 61:112-117.
  20. Parsons LG, Thomas LG, Southard GL, Woodall IR and Jones BJB. Effect of sanguinaria extract on established plaque and gingivitis when supragingivally delivered as a manual rinse or under pressure in an oral irrigator. J Clin Periodontol 1987; 14; 381-385.
  21. Wennstrom JL, Heijl L, Dahlen G and Grondahl K. Periodic subgingival antimicrobial irrigation of periodontal pockets. (I) Clinical observations. J Clin Periodontol 1987; 14:541-550.
Address reprint requests to:

Dr. Nadir Babay
PO Box 60169
Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia
email: Nbabay@ ksu.edu.sa

Tables

 


2001-1-27-1


2001-1-27-2

2001-1-27-3

 
Website designed and maintained by DeltaCAS