| SDJ |
| Editorial Board |
| Advisory Board |
| Information for authors |
| Submit manuscript |
| Subscribe to SDJ |
| Search SDJ |
| About SDJ |
| SDJ Current Issue |
| Journal Archives |
| 2010-22 |
| 22-1 |
ISSN (Print) 1013-9052
EISSN 1658-3558
P.O. Box 52500,
Riyadh 11563,
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| Tel. |
966-1-467-7328 |
| Fax. |
933-1-467-7308 / 966-1-467-7534 |
| Email |
saudidj@ksu.edu.sa |
|
Gingival health among
individuals on hemodialysis in a Saudi population
Farhad Atassi, DDS,
MSc, FICOI
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the gingival health status among patients on hemodialysis. Ninety Saudi patients on hemodialysis participated in the study, and were divided into three subgroups of those who have been on dialysis for 1) less than one year; 2) 1 to 3 years; and 3) for more than 3 years. Four indices: the debris index (DI); the calculus index (CI); the plaque index (PlI) and the gingival index (GI) were used. Data were analyzed using one way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The means of debris index were 1.65, 2.07, and 2.15, with SD± 0.67, 0.47 and 0.48 respectively for the subgroups.The means of plaque index were 1.72, 2.16 and 2.26, with SD±0.64, 0.36 and 0.42 respectively for the revealed groups. The means of calculus index were 1.58, 2.02 and 2.09, with SD± 0.58, 0.28 and 0.39 respectively for the subgroups. The means of gingival index were 1.43, 2.97 and 2.06 with SD± 0.67, 0.38 and 0.35 for the subgroups respectively. Results showed a 100% prevalence of mild to moderate gingivitis. Tukey`s post hoc test showed significant difference in all indices between the 1st and 2nd subgroups, and between the 1st and 3rd subgroups, while no significant difference was found between 2nd and 3rd subgroups. It was concluded that periodontal disease is prevalent in renal dialysis patients who showed unacceptable level of oral hygiene and which may increase with the chronicity of the illness.
Dialysis is an artificial means of removing nitrogenous and other toxic products of metabolism from the blood. For many patients, dialysis is a life-saving intervention that has significantly reduced the mortality of this once fatal disease. Published reports estimated that up to 90% of patients receiving renal dialysis will show oral symptoms1 which might be due to an elevated blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine, and diet restriction.2 The most prominent oral sign found in dialysis patients is pallor of the oral mucosa, which reflects anemia, while other signs may include xerostomia, breath with urea odor and an accelerated rate of calculus formation as a result of altered serum calcium-phosphate product.3 Patients receiving dialysis are more susceptible to infections because of general debilitation, depression of the immunologic response and masking of signs and symptoms of infection by drug therapy.4
The
number of individuals on renal dialysis who receive renal transplants is
increasing, making it advisable that a renal transplant candidate should be
free from infections including oral infections or active periodontal lesion, to
preempt delayed kidney transplantation.5 Opportunistic focal infection may also
develop at the site of the transplant if bacteria-inducing dental treatment is
required soon after transplan-tation. There
are few reports on the oral health, especially gingival health, in hemodialysis
patients. Oshrain et al6 reported a significant correlation between plaque
levels and gingival inflammation in dialysis subjects. In another study,7
severe gingivitis characterized by marked redness, inflammation and tendency to
bleed was observed in the sample studied.
Therefore, the purpose of this research was to determine the gingival
health status among individuals undergoing hemodialysis dialysis.
Ninety patients undergoing renal dialysis were included in this study. The purpose of the study was explained to the patients. The patients were divided into 3 subgroups of those on renal dialysis for 1) less than one year; 2) 1 to 3 years; and 3) longer than 3 years. Two renal dialysis centers were selected namely Ibn Ibrahim Al Shaikh Dialysis Center in King Fahad hospital, Al Baha and the dialysis department in King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh. The clinical parameters studied were oral debris index,8 calculus index,8 plaque index,9 and gingival index.10 (Table 1) Only one examiner performed the assessment on all the renal dialysis patients. Intra-examiner reliability A pilot study was conducted to establish intra-examiner reliability. Ten subjects who volunteered to participate were selected and examined by one examiner who used the four dental indices and recorded them on two occasions to establish intra-examiner reliability. The scores from the indices were analyzed for differences using Kappa test for correlated samples. Intra-examiner reliability indices were k=100% for DI, k=90.3% for PI, k=100% for CI and k=100% for GI respectively.
The ninety participants were 53 females (58.9%) and 37 males (41.1%). The mean ages were 42.9, 46.7 and 47.2 years for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd subgroups respectively. The means of DI were 1.65, 2.07 and 2.15 respectively for the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd subgroups respectively. (Table 2) The means of PI were 1.72, 2.16 and 2.26 for the same subgroups respectively. (Table 3). The means of calculus index CI were 1.58, 2.02 and 2.09 for the same subgroups respectively. (Table 4) Finally, the means of GI were 1.42, 2.97 and 2.06 for the same subgroups respectively. (Table 5).One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine significant differences in the 4 indices among the 3 subgroups at 5% level. Tukey`s post hoc test was used to compare between subgroups (Table 6 & Fig. 1).
There was significant difference between subgroup 1
and subgroup 2 where p-values were 0.02, 0.001, 0.01 and 0.02 for PlI, DI, CI
and GI respectively.There was significant difference between subgroup 1 and
subgroup 3 where p-values were 0.001,
0.001, 0.001 and 0.02. for PlI, DI, CI and GI respectively.No significant
difference was found between subgroup 2 and subgroup 3 where p-values were
.737, .766, .799 and .830 for lI, DI, CI and GI respectively
The ninety participants were 53 females (58.9%) and 37 males (41.1%). The mean ages were 42.9, 46.7 and 47.2 years for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd subgroups respectively. The means of DI were 1.65, 2.07 and 2.15 respectively for the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd subgroups respectively. (Table 2) The means of PI were 1.72, 2.16 and 2.26 for the same subgroups respectively. (Table 3). The means of calculus index CI were 1.58, 2.02 and 2.09 for the same subgroups respectively. (Table 4) Finally, the means of GI were 1.42, 2.97 and 2.06 for the same subgroups respectively. (Table 5).One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine significant differences in the 4 indices among the 3 subgroups at 5% level. Tukey`s post hoc test was used to compare between subgroups (Table 6 & Fig. 1).
There was significant difference between subgroup 1
and subgroup 2 where p-values were 0.02, 0.001, 0.01 and 0.02 for PlI, DI, CI
and GI respectively.There was significant difference between subgroup 1 and
subgroup 3 where p-values were 0.001,
0.001, 0.001 and 0.02. for PlI, DI, CI and GI respectively.No significant
difference was found between subgroup 2 and subgroup 3 where p-values were
.737, .766, .799 and .830 for lI, DI, CI and GI respectively
The authors wish to acknowledge Dr. Nazeer Khan for his assistance with the statistical analysis. In addition, the authors also wish to thank the Head Division and members of the Renal Dialysis Department in King Fahad Hospital, Al Baha, and King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, for their help and support.
Address reprint requests to:
Dr.
Farhad Atassi
|






