• JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator

ISSN (Print) 1013-9052
EISSN 1658-3558

The Saudi Dental Journal,
P.O. Box 52500,
Riyadh 11563,
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Tel.
966-1-467-7328
Fax.
933-1-467-7308 /
966-1-467-7534
Email
saudidj@ksu.edu.sa

Smear layer removal from root dentin using tetracycline

hydrochloride concentrations. An SEM study


Nadir Babay, DDS, MS, DESM
Department of Preventive Dental Sciences College of Dentistry, King Saud University
P.O. Box 60169  Riyadh 11545, KSA


Abstract 

 

The scanning electron microscope was used to evaluate the smear layer removal capacity of periodontally diseased teeth subjected to concentrations of 10mmg/ml and 25mg/ml of tetracycline hydrochloride for one and three minutes, respectively. Thirty- six teeth were divided into 3 equal groups. Groups 1 and 2 were burnished with tetracycline hydrochloride for 1 and 3 minutes with the following concentrations 10mg/ml and 25 mg/ml, respectively.  Group 3 was burnished with cotton swab saturated in distilled water and served as the control. Results showed that the control group exhibited a smear layer. Tetracycline hydrochloride irrespective of the concentration and timing was effective in removing the smear layer. The 1 and 3 minutes application of tetracycline hydrochloride with a concentration of 25mg/ml revealed widely exposed dentinal tubules. No significant difference (p>0.05) was found between the experimental groups in relation to timing was noted.

 

Introduction

 

An objective of periodontal treatment is the predictable regeneration of the periodontium in areas previously affected by periodontal disease.1 For regeneration to occur, it is necessary to eliminate calculus, bacterial plaque, and other cytotoxic substances on or within the diseased root surface.2

Human root surfaces have been treated with many substances in an attempt to make the root physiologically acceptable for the regeneration of a new connective tissue attachment.3,4 For over ninety years, acids of various types had been placed on root surfaces in attempts to modify the diseased tooth structures.5 Such treatment was to enlarge dentinal tubules into which healing connective tissue could enter.6            

Surface demineralization with tetracycline hydrochloride or citric acid enhances the binding of the extracellular matrix glycoprotein fibronectin to dentin.7 This was thought to enhance attachment and growth of gingival fibroblasts on the dentin surface.8,9 In vitro effect of tetracycline hydrochloride on dentin has revealed several properties of tetracycline which indicated its potential usefulness in regenerative periodontal procedures.10 Tetracycline has a low pH in concentrated solution, acts as a calcium chelator and its application results in enamel and root surface demineralization.11,12 Tetracycline hydrochloride concentrations used ranged from 0.5% to 200% and application period varied between 0.5 to 10 minutes.7,13,14    

Wikesjo et al.15 demonstrated that 10 or 100 mg/ml solutions of tetracycline hydrochloride were sufficiently concentrated to remove the smear layer and expose a regular pattern of open dentinal tubules. Optimal concentration and the application interval of tetracycline to remove the smear layer and achieve root surface characteristics which may support periodontal reconstructive therapy have yet to be established. Since long etching time of 3 minutes and above had been shown to impair periodontal healing,16 it seems suitable to use short time etching to remove the smear layer and promote new connective tissue attachment to the root surface.      

Consequently, the purpose of this scanning electron microscope study was to evaluate the ability of two different tetracycline concentrations to remove the smear layer on root dentin when applied over short times.

 

Materials and Methods

 

Dentin Block Preparation

Twelve periodontally involved extracted human teeth were used. After extraction, the teeth were immediately cleaned and rinsed in distilled water and then stored for 48 hours at 5oC in distilled water until ready to be used.

Following extraction, the border between healthy and diseased root surfaces was marked with a tapered fissure bur. A small diamond disc mounted on mandrel in a slow speed hand piece under continuous irrigation was used to remove the crowns at the cemento-enamel junction and the non diseased part of each root in the apical area as well as sectioning longitudinally the remaining mid- root through the root canal.

Using a high speed hand piece with copious water coolant, the pulpal tissue was removed and a horizontal shallow groove for identification purpose was placed on the pulpal surface of each specimen. To remove the cementum and expose the underlying dentin, each diseased root specimen was thoroughly planed and flattened with a 15µm grit diamond bur* under continuous water coolant at 20000 to 30000 rpm as described by Trombelli et al.10 The dentin surfaces were scrubbed with a soft brush and distilled water to remove debris. Each root specimen was then sectioned longitudinally into 3 equal parts with a small diamond disk under continuous irrigation with a slow speed hand piece. The specimens were rectangular in shape, approximately 3mm long, 3mm wide and 1mm thick. A total of 36 dentin specimens were randomly divided into 3 groups for conditioning at tetracycline hydrochloride (weight volume) of 10 and 25mg/ml and distilled water for the control group  with 2 application periods of 1 and 3 minutes (i.e., 3 samples per group).

Preparation of Tetracycline HCL Solutions

A freshly made tetracycline solution was used. The tetracycline solution† was prepared by slowly adding pure tetracycline into distilled water and dissolving it in 20 to 35 ml of distilled water using a magnetic stirrer to mix the solution to a final volume of 50ml. The concentrations (weight per volume) of the tetracycline hydrochloride test solutions were 10 and 25mg/ml. The pH of each solution was tested with a hand-held, battery operated pH meter+ and they measured 3.4 and 1.8 for the groups with 10 and 25 mg/ml, respectively. These groups served as experimental groups, while group 3 received no tetracycline hydrochloride and served as control. The specimens of the control group were burnished with a cotton swab saturated  in distilled water and the pH was 6.8. The specimens in each experimental group were conditioned with one of the two concentrations and the dentin surface was burnished for 1 and 3 minutes with a cotton pellet soaked in a fresh solution of tetracycline hydrochloride and which was changed every 30 seconds.

SEM Study Preparations

All specimens were prepared for scanning electron microscopy in the following manner.  After fixation, dehydration was performed in a graded series of ethanol with 100% acetone as a final step. Each of the sectioned pieces was mounted on aluminum stubs, coated in gold with a sputter technique, and examined in the scanning electron microscope‡, operated at 15, 20 and 25 kV and with a tilt angle of between 0 and 30 degrees.

The surface characteristics of the dentinal specimens were evaluated descriptively for the presence of dentinal tubules and smear layer. The evaluations were made from the 4 X 5 inch SEM print (made under x 1000, 2000 magnification). All thirty six specimens were examined and photographed at these different magnifications.

Each dentin surface was scanned in its entirety to obtain an overview of the general surface topography. Representatives' areas that were characteristic of the general surface topography were selected for each specimen and photographed. The dentinal surfaces in the experimental and control groups were assessed for the presence of dentinal tubules and smear layer by a visual method. Assessments were made on photographs using the scale of zero to four as described by Madison et al.13

0: no removal of the smear layer; 1: greater than no effect but less than one half removal; 2: approximately one half removal of the smear layer; 3: greater than half but less than complete removal; 4: complete removal of the smear layer.

A Kruskal-Wallis test was performed on these evaluations. Tukey`s nonparametric multiple range test was used to determine which groups were significantly different. The test was used to compare the three groups separately for the presence of dentinal tubules and smear layer

  

Results

  

Scanning electron microscopy examination of control specimens showed an irregular coating previously defined as a smear layer. Few dentinal tubule openings were visible and these were partially obscured (Figs. 1&2). When present, tubule orifices were not uniform in diameter. There were no differences in the morphological characteristics between 1 and 3 minutes applications.

All specimens exposed to tetracycline hydrochloride solution at different concentrations in two application times demonstrated different degrees of removal of the smear layer and open dentinal tubules.

The dentin slabs treated by burnishing with tetracycline 10mg/ml for 1 and 3 minutes demonstrated the removal of smear layer and a homogenous surface with patent tubular openings of variable shapes and sizes. In the 1 minute and 3 minutes groups, a small amount of grinding debris partially occluded the dentinal tubules (Fig. 3).

Corresponding views of the 25mg/ml tetracycline hydrochloride for 1 and 3 minutes were substantially different in appearance from the other surfaces (Figs. 4, 5). The dentinal tubules were found to be strikingly round in shape and very discernable with a more regular homogeneous arrangement than the other tetracycline hydrochloride concentrations.

The nonparametric one-way analysis of variance (Kruskal-Wallis) indicated a difference, between the three groups (P<0.0001).    

The Tukey type nonparametric multiple range tests indicated that group 3 (control) was significantly different from the other two  groups (P<0.001). Group 1 was significantly different from group 2 (P<0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the groups in relation to the timing (p>0.05).

 

Discussion

 

In this in vitro study, SEM was used to evaluate the morphologic characteristics of diseased dentin treated with tetracycline hydrochloride solutions applied in different concentrations and for different periods of time. The control surfaces presented an amorphous, irregular coating with dentinal tubules obscured.           

Tetracycline solutions treatment of root dentin specimens at 10 and 25 mg/ml resulted in the disappearance of the amorphous irregular coating.  The results confirmed earlier studies which showed that conditioning with tetracycline hydrochloride removed the amorphous surface layer and exposed dentin with open tubules to produce similar surface characteristics.12-15 The surface characteristics are represented by the absence of smear layer and the presence of open dentinal tubules.     

Root surface conditioning with tetracycline has also been shown to influence fibroblast attachment to tetracycline treated root surface in vitro.17,18 However, a study utilizing dentin blocks and treated root dentin specimens with 0.5% of tetracycline hydrochloride for 5 minutes revealed that tetracycline hydrochloride did not routinely remove the smear layer and did not expose tubules orifices19 and so the authors concluded that higher concentrations of TC-Hcl might be required to achieve complete demineralization. The findings of this study are in accordance with this observation which demonstrated that tetracycline hydrochloride demineralization of root surface using two different concentrations for 1 and 3 minutes produced different surface characteristics. The concentration of 25mg/ml appeared to be more effective in exposing dentinal tubules regardless of the application time. The results of this study are limited to the physical root surface changes and the potential of the tested solutions as a root surface conditioner for the removal of the smear layer and exposure of dentinal tubules.

Sterrett et al.20 found that effectiveness of highly concentrated citric acid burnishing was time dependent and acid solution applied for 5 minutes produced a relatively debris free, flat surface. In this study, there was no significant difference among the groups in relation to the timing (p>0.05).       

One possible explanation for these varying results could be the frequency of solution application. There are different modes of applying the etching solution. The burnishing technique introduced by Miller is a marked deviation from conventional demineralization techniques including the placement method.21        

The burnishing effect of the root conditioner on the instrumented tooth surface has been studied 22 resulting in a chemical and mechanical removal of the smear layer and allowing for demineralization of the underlying root surface. In this study, the tetracycline solution was applied using a burnishing technique. It has been theorized that the acid burnishing technique resulted in a chemical/mechanical action that enhanced the removal of chemically loosened inorganic material and surface debris exposing the underlying root surface to the demineralization action of fresh acid solution.22 This may ultimately achieve an optimal degree of demineralization. In the Sterrett study,22 a single drop of demineralizing agent was used which may have become saturated, precluding any more demineralization, while repeated applications were used in this study.        

This concept contrasts with the findings of the Labahn et al.23 study where the mode of applying the demineralizing solution did not appear to have any consistent effects on the morphologic parameters they studied. One explanation may relate to the mechanical abrading action of the cotton pellet soaked with the demineralizing solution. Its importance could explain why in their study the depth of penetration was less in the burnished group than in the non-burnished group. 

According to Register and Burdick, 24 the range of acid penetration depended on the time of application of the acid solution. The present findings suggest that 10mg/ml burnishing with tetracycline hydrochloride may be enough for smear layer removal, but 25mg/ml burnishing applications of tetracycline was adequate to completely expose the dentinal tubules irrespective of the time used.          

There were some relevant differences in the surface morphologic alterations produced in dentin between specimens treated with different concentrations of tetracycline solution. This was possibly due to the differences of pH (3.4 and 1.8.) of all freshly prepared solutions. Further studies are needed to establish whether and to what extent the morphologic surfaces changes produced by tetracycline hydrochloride solution application may provide a biologically favorable substrate for connective tissue cell repopulation of diseased root surfaces.  

In summary, the results of this study confirmed that conditioning with tetracycline produced morphological changes to dentin surfaces. Therefore, it was concluded that tetracycline hydrochloride concentration of 25mg/ml will alter the dentin surface by removing the smear layer and opening the dentinal tubules irrespective of the time used.

 

References
  1. Stahl SS. Repair potential of the soft tissue-root   interface. J Periodontol 1977; 48:545-552.
  2. Wirthlin MR. The current status of new attachment therapy. J Periodontol 1981; 52:529-544.
  3. Register AA, Burdick FA. Accelerated reattachment   with cementogenesis to dentin, demineralized in  situ. II. Defect repair. J Periodontol 1976; 47: 497-505.
  4. Blomlöf, Lindskog S. Root surface texture and early  cells and tissue colonization after different etching   modalities. Eur J Oral Sc 1995; 103: 17-24.
  5. Stewart HT. Partial removal of cementum and   decalcification of tooth in the treatment of pyorrh  alveolaris. Dent Cosmos 1899; 41:617-626.
  6. Ririe CM, Crigger M, Selvig K. Healing of periodontal   connective tissues following surgical wounding and   application of citric acid in dogs. J Periodont Res   1980; 15:314-327.
  7. Lafferty A, Gher ME, Gray JI. Comparative SEM study   on the effect of acid etching with tetracycline Hcl or    citric acid etching on instrumented periodontally-  involved human root surfaces. J Periodontol 1993;   64:689-693.
  8. Terranova VP, Martin GR. Molecular factors    determining gingival tissue interaction with tooth    structure. J Periodont Res 1982; 17:530-533.
  9. Terranova VP, Franzetti LC, Hic S, Lyall RM, Wikesjo    UM. A biochemical approach to periodontal   regeneration: Tetracycline treatment of dentin    promotes fibroblast adhesion and growth. J   Periodont Res 1986; 21:330-337.
  10. Trombelli L, Scabbia A, Calura GC. Nondiseased   cementum and dentin root surface following       tetracycline hydrochloride conditioning: SEM study of the effects of solution concentration and    application time. Int J Periodont Res Dent 1994; 14:             461-470.
  11. Al-Ali W, Bissada NF, Greenwell H. The effect of local   doxycycline with and without tricalcium phosphate on regenerative healing potential of periodontal    osseous defects in dogs. J Periodontol 1989; 60:582-            590.
  12. Babay N. SEM study on the effect of two different  demineralization methods with saturated     tetracycline hydrochloride on diseased root surface.     J Cont Dent Pract 2001; 2:1-7.  Spring issue.
  13. Madison JG, Hohett SD. The effects of different      tetracyclines on the dentin root surface of instrumented, periodontally involved human teeth: A Comparative scanning electron microscopic study. J Periodontol 1997; 68:739-745.
  14. Isik AG, Tarim B, Hafez AA, Yalcin FS, Onan U, Cox CF.    A comparative scanning electron microscopic study   on the characteristics of demineralized dentin root surface using different tetracycline HCl concentrations and application times. J Periodontol   2000; 71:219-225.
  15. Wikesjo UM, Baker PJ, Christersson LA, Genco RJ, Lyall RM, Hic S, DiFlorio RM, Terranova VP. A     biochemical approach to periodontal regeneration: Tetracycline treatment conditions dentin surfaces. J Periodont Res 1986; 21:322-329.
  16. Blomlöf J, Jansson K, Blomlöf L, Lindskog S. Long   time    etching at low pH jeopardizes periodonta  healing. J  Clin Periodontol 1995; 22: 459-463.
  17. Rompen EH, Kohl J, Nusgens B, Lapiere CM. Kinetic     aspects of gingival and periodontal ligament   fibroblast attachment to surface conditioned dentin.     J Den Res 1993; 72: 607-612.
  18. Trombelli L, Scabbia A, Zangari F, Griselli A, Wikesjo     UME, Calura G. Effect of tetracycline Hcl on   periodontally affected human root surfaces. J Periodontol 1995; 66: 685-691.
  19. Hanes PJ, O`Brien NJ, Garnick JJ. A morphological     comparison of radicular dentin following root      planning and treatment with citric acid and tetracycline Hcl. J Clin Periodontol 1991; 18: 660-668.
  20. Sterrett JD, Murphy HJ. Citric acid burnishing of     dentinal root surfaces: A scanning electro microscopic report. J Clin Periodontol 1989; 16:98-   104.
  21. Miller PD. Root coverage using a free soft tissue    graft following citric acid application (III). A     successful and predictable procedure in areas of deep-wide recessions. Int J Periodont Res Dent 1985;   5:14-37.
  22. Sterrett JD, Simmons J, Whitford G, Russell CM.      Tetracycline demineralization of dentin: The effects    of concentration and application time. J Clin    Periodontol 1997; 24: 457-463.
  23. Labahn R, Fahrenbach WH, Clark SM, Lie T, Adams DF.   Root dentin morphology after different modes of    citric acid and tetracycline hydrochloride       conditioning. J Periodontol 1995; 63: 303-309.
Figures

  2003-1-24-1

2003-1-24-2

 


 
Website designed and maintained by DeltaCAS