• JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator

ISSN (Print) 1013-9052
EISSN 1658-3558

The Saudi Dental Journal,
P.O. Box 52500,
Riyadh 11563,
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Tel.
966-1-467-7328
Fax.
933-1-467-7308 /
966-1-467-7534
Email
saudidj@ksu.edu.sa

Comparison of sodium hypochlorite, propolis and saline as

root canal irrigants: A pilot study


Abdullah M. AlDosari*, BDS, MSD, PhD
Amjad H. Wyne**, BDS, BSc, MDS, FASDC
Enosakhare S. Akpata***,  BDS, MDS, FDSRCPS, FWACS
Nazeer B. Khan**, MSc, PhD

Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, KSA


Sodium hypochlorite as an endodontic irrigant, poses problems of toxicity, odor and discoloration of operatory items. An equally effective, but safe irrigant is desirable.  The purpose of this study was to compare the anti-microbial activity of propolis with that of sodium hypochlorite in an in vitro root canal system. Forty-nine extracted human teeth with large carious lesions reaching the pulp were instrumented using step-back technique.  Propolis, sodium hypochlorite and saline were used as irrigants.  Microbiological samples were taken from the teeth immediately after accessing the canal, and after instrumentation and irrigation. The results of this study indicated that the propolis has antimicrobial activity equal to that of sodium hypochlorite.

 

Saudi Dental Journal 2003;15(2):100-103.

 
Website designed and maintained by DeltaCAS