• JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator

ISSN (Print) 1013-9052
EISSN 1658-3558

The Saudi Dental Journal,
P.O. Box 52500,
Riyadh 11563,
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Tel.
966-1-467-7328
Fax.
933-1-467-7308 /
966-1-467-7534
Email
saudidj@ksu.edu.sa

Treatment demand, patient's self-esteem and main

expectation from orthognathic surgery in Saudi patients

with dentofacial deformity

 

 Ahmed A. Al-Deaij, BDS, MSc
Dental Department Medical Service, King Fahd Security College , P.O Box 125260, Riyadh 11324, KSA

 

Abstract 

 

The aims of this study were: first, to determine treatment demand and factors that affect the decision of a Saudi patient with dentofacial deformity to undergo orthognathic surgery; second, to determine patient's self-esteem and main expectation from orthognathic surgery; third, to determine educational level, gender and age distribution in Saudi patients with dentofacial deformity. The study sample included all 115 Saudi patients that were screened and assigned for orthognathic surgery at the College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh during the period from 1997 to 1999. The collected data of the present sample were obtained from distributed questionnaire.  Chi-square test was used for data analysis. Most individuals in the investigated sample were single and at a higher educational level with mean age of 21.4 years ±0.7. Improvement of facial appearance was a major expectation from surgical outcome (70.4%). Teasing and criticism from others were the main reasons for seeking treatment, which adversely affected patient self-esteem. Self-motivation was the main factor for patient's decision to undergo orthognathic surgery. Saudi female and male patients showed relatively similar demand and self-motivation for orthognathic surgery. There was positive correlation between high educational level and treatment demand for orthognathic surgery. Furthermore, among the different classification of dentofacial deformity, patients with skeletal Class III expressed higher demand than others.

 
Introduction

 

The face is a major source of vocal and emotional communication, which may have an effect on patient's self-esteem and treatment demand. Improvement of dentofacial appearance has been reported to be a strong motivational factor for many individuals who decide to undergo orthodontic treatment and/or orthognathic surgery. Motivation to seek surgical orthodontic treatment appears to be strongly related to the individuals' perception of the extent to which their dentofacial appearance deviated from socio-cultural norms. There is a strong relationship between appearance and social acceptance.71-4 Besides esthetics, patients generally seek orthognathic surgery due to other factors such as functional insufficiency, speech problems and TMJ pain.5-9 In addition, educational level, social status, gender and self-esteem are considered factors, which have effects on patient's demand for orthognathic surgery.

Proffit et al.10 found that women were twice as likely as men to seek clinical evaluation for dentofacial deformity and more likely to receive surgical treatment once evaluated. Sheats et al.11 noted that females demonstrated more concern regarding their dentofacial appearance (35%) than males (19%) which was in agreement with previous studies.10, 13-16et al.17 reported that patients with severe disharmony expressed greater demand for treatment and their skeletal appearance often have an effect on the quality of their life. Bennet

Previous studies showed a significant relationship between self-esteem and the degree of dentofacial deformity.18-23 Meyer et al.18 studied patient's motivation for seeking orthognathic surgery.  He found that patients with facial abnormalities looked to surgery as a way of improving not only their appearance, but also their self-esteem and social acceptance. Huntton19 and Crowell et al.20 recognized that patients were more satisfied with the effect of surgery on their self-esteem and appearance rather than with masticatory improvement.  However, most of them reported a positive life changes as a result of the surgery. Facial esthetics was the most important physical characteristic feature in the development of high self-esteem, where the individuals who are satisfied with their facial appearance expressed greater self-esteem.20 Giddon22 reported on the importance of orofacial area in successful life communication and interpersonal relations, which is a result of increased patient's self-esteem.

The information with regard to patient's perception and its influence on the decision to undergo orthognathic surgery should add to proper understanding during the planning for surgical correction to a better prediction and patient's satisfaction on the final result. Education, socioeconomic status, gender and self-esteem are factors which may influence a person's perception of facial deformity and demand for orthodontic treatment.2,3,4

The aims of the present study were: first, to determine treatment demand and factors that affect the decision to undergo orthognathic surgery among Saudi patients with dentofacial deformity; second, to determine patient's self-esteem and main expectation from orthognathic surgery; third, to determine educational level, gender and age distribution among Saudi patients with dentofacial deformity.
 
Materials and Methods

 

The study sample included 115 Saudi patients that were screened and assigned for orthognathic surgery at the College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh during the period from 1997 to 1999. All patients were adults with no cleft lip and/or cleft palate or severe genetic disturbances.

Every patient was interviewed individually to answer a constructed questionnaire. The first part of the questionnaire contained patients’ personal data, which included name, gender, age, social status, educational level and the chief complaint.

The second part of the questionnaire consisted of a set of multiple-choice questions that was used in the assessment of patient’s demand, self-esteem, patient’s main expectation from surgical outcome and factors that affect patient’s decision to undergo orthognathic surgery. Each patient was interviewed individually to answer a constructed questionnaire. The set of multiple choice questions facilitated comparison of answers. The author was available when the questionnaires were being filled to make sure that the patient understood well all the questions and provided the answers objectively.

Each patient was informed that surgical intervention was an essential part of the treatment plan. Then, they were asked to select either to agree or disagree with the surgical approach. For patients who indicated agreement for surgical intervention, the level of their agreement was also determined. This was carried out by requesting the patients to mark the level of agreement on a given ascending scale from one to ten. In order to avoid overestimation of patient’s demand and to facilitate its statistical correlation with other variables, patient demand was reclassified into uneven classes (low, moderate and high) demand according to the following scores: 1-5, 6-8 and 9-10, respectively.

Statistical analysis

The data obtained were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software program and presented in the form of tables and figures. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all variables. Chi-square test was used to determine the significant relationship between different variables.  The significant level was set at P < 0.05.

 
Results

 

Out of 115 cases, 67 (58.3%) were males and 107 (92.2%) cases were not married. The age-range of the investigated patients were from 17 to 35 years with a mean of 21.4 ± 0.7 years.  The majority of the patients (54%) were in the age-range of 17-20 years (Fig. 1). Fifty-seven percent of the patients had university education while only 2.6% had primary school education. Half of the patients were concerned mainly about their skeletal appearance whereas 25.2% were concerned with their dental appearance (Table 1). Improvement of patient's self-esteem after correction of facial defect was expected by 76.5% of the patients while 66.1% of the patients used to suffer from criticism regarding their facial appearance by friends and relatives. On the other hand, 27.8% of the patients' dentofacial appearance made them reserved (Table 2). Self-motivation was found to be the main factor (55%) for patient's decision to undergo orthognathic surgery. Dental professional motivation was the second factor that affected patient's decision to accept orthognathic surgery (26.1%) and about two-thirds (63.5%) of the patients indicated high treatment demand (Table 3).

A major improvement of facial esthetics as a result of surgical correction was expected by 70.4% of the patients whereas improvement of mastication was xpected by 12.2% (Table 4). A significant relationship was found between patient's treatment demand and self-motivation (P<0.05) as shown in Table 3. Patients in the high educational level reflected higher demand than others (Fig. 2). The Saudi female and male patients showed relatively similar treatment demand and self motivation for orthognathic surgery (Fig. 3). In addition, skeletal Class III patients expressed higher demand (49.1%) than Class II (43.8%) and Class I facial deformity (6.8%) as shown in Figure 4.
 
Discussion

 

Cleft lip and palate patients or others with severe genetic skeletal disturbances were not involved in the present sample because their treatment strategies are different. Treatment strategies for patients with syndromes such as Down's syndrome are different from those of ordinary orthognathic patients. Patients with syndromes are usually exposed to surgery at a much younger age in order to prevent social rejection by family members, peers and to promote development of higher social acceptance and self-esteem.24-26

An extensive review of the literature from 1960 to 1999 indicated that there was precise index introduced to measure patient's demand for orthognathic surgery. Therefore, the present investigation was designed to include certain questions that reflected patient's agreement regarding surgical approach and the level of this agreement was graded from one to ten.

Complaint from facial appearance was expressed by 49.6% of the patients. This indicated to a large extent that dentofacial appearance was a major concern of most Saudi patients demanding orthognathic surgery. Previous studies showed that dentofacial appearance was the major concern of the patients who sought surgical-orthodontic treatment. They reported a relationship between the dentofacial appearance and social acceptance.21,22,27 In the present study, facial appearance was considered the most important physical characteristic feature in the developing of facial self-satisfaction by the Saudi patients.

A total of 63.5% of the patients had shown high demand for surgical treatment. This could be explained by the severity of facial deformity and the concentration of most patients on the improvement of their facial appearance. Patients with a higher educational level expressed a higher demand for treatment. This most likely indicated that patient's awareness was influenced by educational level, which was reflected through high concern regarding their dentofacial appearance than others. This was confirmed by the significant correlation between patient's demand, self-perception and educational level (P<0.05).

 A significant correlation was also found between patient's demand and self-motivation (P<0.05). This result is in agreement with Kiyak et al.28 It most likely indicated that the lack of self-satisfaction regarding dentofacial appearance played a significant role in patient's demand for orthognathic surgery which may have an effect on patient's self-esteem.

The treatment demand was slightly lower among male patients compared to female patients. This is in agreement with Balkhi and Zahrani,29 and Kawari30 results in a similar ethnic group. This might mean that esthetic improvement was considered as a major reason for women to undergo orthognathic surgery. This was supported by the significant correlation between female patients and self motivation (P<0.05). However, the result of previous studies indicated that females in other ethnic groups showed greater demand for orthognathic surgery compared to the present study.8, 31-33 This may be due to two possible reasons; first, females in other ethnic groups may have better knowledge regarding orthognathic surgery. Secondly, social condition and cultural background might play a role in limiting treatment demand by the Saudi female to perform orthognathic surgery.

Patients with Class II skeletal deformity showed lower demand (43.8%) than patients with Class III skeletal deformity (49.1%). This result is consistent with that of Proffit et al.10 There are two possible reasons for this lower demand of skeletal Class II compared to skeletal Class III. First, patients with skeletal Class II may be more socially acceptable than those with Class III. Secondly, skeletal Class II patients can hide their skeletal defect either by forward posturing of the mandible (Sunday bite) or the male patients can camouflage their deformity by growing beards.

In this study, 66.1% of the patients were suffering from criticism regarding their dentofacial appearance by friends and relatives. According to Helm et al.23 such continuous criticism often has an adverse effect on patient's self-esteem. This suggests that psychosocial pressure such as teasing or criticism would increase patient demand for orthognathic surgery. Further, Bell et al.34 found that patient's decision to undergo orthognathic surgery was due to psychological factors rather than morphological characteristics. Kiyak et al.7 reported same finding.

In the present study, dentofacial appearance was considered a major factor, which affected the patient's self-esteem (76.5%). This finding confirmed that dentofacial appearance is a major concern for patient's satisfaction.  This is because others often judge the patient for his/her dentofacial appearance. Furthermore, accepted facial appearance by the society plays an important role in the development of an individual's self-concept and self-esteem. This is in agreement with Meyer18 and Crowell et al.20 reports.

The improvement of facial esthetics following surgical correction was expected by 70.4% of the patients in the present sample. This clearly indicates that the main reason for seeking orthognathic surgery was the improvement of facial esthetics, which coincided well with patient's chief complaint. This is in agreement with the findings obtained by Wictorin et al.,5 Jacobson,6 Kiyak et al.,35 Mohlin8 and Flanary et al.9
 
Conclusions

 

  1. Most of Saudi patients demanding orthognathic surgery were single. They had higher education with the age range of 17 to 20 years.
  2. The improvement of facial appearance was the main expectation of most Saudi patients demanding orthognathic surgery.
  3. Teasing and criticism from friends and relatives were the main reasons, which adversely affected the patient's self-esteem.
  4. Self-motivation was the main factor for patient's decision to undergo orthognathic surgery (55.7%) followed by motivation from the dentists, parents and friends.
  5. The Saudi females showed slightly higher demand and self-motivation for orthognathic surgery than males.
  6. The patients with skeletal class III expressed higher demand than others.

References

 

  1. Baldwin DC, Barner ML, Baldwin MA. Social and cultural variables in the decision for orthodontic treatment (Abstract). J Dent Res 1967; 45:114.
  2. Kelly JE, Harvey CR. An assessment of the occlusion of the teeth of youths 12-17 years. United States PHS publication No. 77-1644. Washington D.C. Government Printing Office, Feb. 1977.
  3. Jenkins PM, Feldman BS, Stirrup DR. The effect of social class and dental features on referral for orthodontic advice and treatment. Br J Orthod 1984; 11:85-88.
  4. Bergstrom K, Halling A, Higgare J. Orthodontic treatment demand. Differences between urban and rural areas. Community Dent Health 1990; 15(4): 272-276.
  5. Wictorin L, Hillerstrom K, Sorensen S. Biological and psychosocial factors in-patients with malformation of the jaws. Scand J Plast Reconsrt Surg 1969; 3:138-143.
  6. Jacobson AMDS. The influence of children's dentofacial appearance on their social attractiveness as judged by peers and lay adults. Am J Orthod 1981; 79:399-415.
  7. Kiyak HA, McNeill RW, West RA. Personality characteristics as predictors and sequelae of surgical and conventional orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1986; 19:79-90. 
  8. Mohlin B. Need and demand for orthodontic treatment in a group of women in Sweden. Eur J Orthod 1982; 4:231-242.
  9. Flanary CM, Barnwell GM, Alexander JM. Patient perception of orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod 1985; 88:137-145.
  10. Proffit WR, Phillips C, Dann C. Who seeks surgical-orthodontic treatment? Int J Adult Orthod Orthogn Surg 1990; 5: 153-160.
  11. Sheats RD, McGorray SP, Keeling SD, Wheeler TT, King GJ. Occlusal traits and perception of orthodontic need in eighth grade students. Angle Orthod 1998; 68(2): 107-114.
  12. Boverman IK, Clarkson FE, Rosenkrantz PS. Sex-role stereotypes and clinical judgments of mental health. In: Bardwick TM (ed). Reading on the psychology of women. New York: Harper & Row Publishers Inc., 1972.  
  13. Albino JE, Tedesco LA, Conny DJ.  Patient perceptions of dental facial esthetics: Shared concerns in orthodontics and prosthodontics. J Prosth Dent 1984; 52(1):9-13.
  14. Holmes A. The subjective need and demand for orthodontic treatment. Br J Orthod 1992; 19(4): 287-297.
  15. Tuominen ML, Tuominen RJ. Factors associated with subjective need for orthodontic treatment among Finnish university applicants. Acta Odont Scand 1994; 52: 106-110.
  16. Wheeler T, McGorray S, Yurkiewicz L, Keeling S, Kings G. Orthodontic treatment demand and need in third and fourth grade schoolchildren. Am J Orthod 1994; 22: 437-440.
  17. Bennet ME, Phillips CL. Assessment of health related quality of life for patients with severe skeletal disharmony. A review of issues. Int J Adult Orthod Orthog Surg 1999; 14(1): 65-75.
  18. Meyer E, Jacobson WE, Edgerton MT. Motivational patterns in patients seeking elective plastic surgery. Psycho Med 1960; 22:193-201.
  19. Huntton C. Patient's evaluation of surgical correction of prognathism. Survey of 32 patients. Oral Surg 1967; 25: 255-258.
  20. Crowell NT, SazimaMJ, Elder ST. Survey of patients attitudes after surgical correction of prognathism: Survey of 33 patients. Oral Surg 1970; 28:818-822.
  21. Berscheid E, Walster E, Bohrnstedt G. Body image. Psychol Today 1973; 7: 119-131.
  22. Giddon DB. The mouth and quality of life. NY J Dent 1978; 48:3-10.  
  23. Helm S, Kreiborg S, Solow B. Psychosocial implications of malocclusion: 15 years follow up study in 30 years old Danes. Am J Orthod 1985; 87:110-118.
  24. Tobiasen JMC. Psychosocial correlates of congenital facial clefts: A conceptualization and model. Cleft Palate J 1984; 21:3.
  25. Pertschuk MJ, Whitaker LA. Psychosocial adjustments and craniofacial malformations in childhood. Clin Plast Surg 1985; 75:177-182.
  26. Proffit WR, White RP. The need for surgical orthodontic treatment. A textbook of surgical-orthodontic treatment. Mosby-Yearbook Inc., 1991 pp. 2-23.
  27. Whitaker LA, Pertschuk MJ. Psychosocial considerations in craniofacial deformity. Clin Plst Surg 1987; 14:20-28. 
  28. Kiyak HA, McNeill RW, West RA. The emotional impact of orthognathic surgery and conventional orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1985; 88:224-234.
  29. Balkhi KM, Zahrani AA. The pattern of malocclusion in Saudi Arabian patients attending for orthodontic treatment at College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh. The Saudi Dental Journal 1994; 6:138-144. 
  30. Kawari HC. Malocclusion, Complexity and treatment urgency among Saudi patients seeking orthodontic treatment. Cairo Dent J 1998; 14: 377-382.
  31. Ingervall B, Hedgard B. Awareness of malocclusion and desire of orthodontic treatment in 18 years old Swedish men. Acta Odont Scand 1974; 32: 93-101.
  32. Thilander B. Indication for orthodontic treatment in adults. Er J Orthod 1979; 1:227-241.
  33. Synono M, Tada W, Rokusya Y, Zuiki Y, Tensin S, Tabuchi T. Psychological study of questionnaire relating to dentition and orthodontic treatment. Nippon-Kyosei Shikkai-Zasshi 1990; 49:443-453.
  34. Bell, Kiyak HA, Donald R, McNeill RW, Wallen T.  Perception of facial profile and their influence on the decision to undergo orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod 1985; 88(4): 323-332.
  35. Kiyak HA, Hohl T, Sherrick RA, West RA, McNeill RW, Bucher F. Sex differences in motives for and outcomes of orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg 1981; 39: 757-764 
Tables

 

Table 1. Chief complaint of the patients  

Chief complaint

Frequency

Percent (%)

Skeletal appearance

57

49,6

Dental appearance

29

25,2

Speech problem

10

8,7

Masticatory problem

13

11,3

TMJ pain

6

5,2

Total

115

100


Table 2.  Assessment of patient self-esteem in the present sample (n=115)

Questions

Yes (%)

No(%)

1. Does your dentofacial appearance make you more reserved?

27.8

Sometimes

(32.2)

40.0

2. Do you think correction of your dentofacial defect will improve your self-esteem?

76.5

23.5

3. Do you experience teasing or criticism because of your dentofacial appearance?

66.1

33.9

 


Table 3. 
Patient's treatment demand and self motivation

Motivation

Treatment demand

Total

High

Moderate

Low

Parents

5 (33.3)

7 (46.7)

3 (20.0)

15 (13.0)

Self

54 (84.4)

9 (14.1)

1 (1.6)

64 (55.7)

Friends

1 (16.7)

2 (33.3)

3 (50.0)

6 (5.2)

Dentist

13 (43.3)

12 (40.0)

5 (16.7)

30 (26.1)

Total

73 (63.5)

30 (26.1)

12 (10.4)

115

 


Table 4. 
Patient's main expectation from orthognathic surgery 

Expectation

Frequency

Percent (%)

Esthetic improvements

81

70.4

Speech improvement

13

11.3

Reduce TMJ pain

7

6.1

Masticatory improvement

14

12.2

Total

115

100

 

Figure 1. Frequency distribution of patients' age in the present sample (Mean=21.4 years, n=115).
2005-2-103

Figure 2. Patient's demand versus educational level in Saudi patients with dentofacial deformity (n=115).
2005-2-104-1

Figure 3. Patient's demand versus gender distribution in the present sample (n=115).
2005-2-104-2

Figure 4. Patient's demand versus skeletal deformity (n=115).
2005-2-104-3

 
Website designed and maintained by DeltaCAS