• JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator

ISSN (Print) 1013-9052
EISSN 1658-3558

The Saudi Dental Journal,
P.O. Box 52500,
Riyadh 11563,
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Tel.
966-1-467-7328
Fax.
933-1-467-7308 /
966-1-467-7534
Email
saudidj@ksu.edu.sa

Trends in dental caries and missing teeth in adult patients

in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia

 

Nadya A. Al-Ghannam,* BDS, MSc, SBARD, Nazeer B. Khan,** MSc, PhD
Abdullah R. Al-Shammery,*** BDS, MDS, Amjad H. Wyne,** BDS, BSc, MDS, FASDC

* Dental Center, Al Ahsa Region, Saudi Arabia
** College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh
*** Private College of Dentistry and Pharmacy, Riyadh

 

Abstract 

 

The aim of the study was to determine dental caries prevalence and severity among adult patients attending Al-Ahsa Dental Center in Al-Ahsa Region of Saudi Arabia. A total of 544 adult patients, 42% males and 58% females with a mean age of 42.7±18.1 years, were examined for dental caries utilizing WHO criteria for diagnosis of dental caries. The caries prevalence among the sample was 89.2% with a mean DMFT score of 13.24±11.53. The mean DMFT scores of the patients from urban areas (14.03±12.11) were significantly higher than patients from rural areas (11.39 ± 9.84) (P<0.01). Missing teeth was the major component of the total DMFT score. About 17% of the patients were edentulous. However, more than half (56.8%) of the patients above 61 years were edentulous. In conclusion, the caries prevalence and severity were very high among the subjects studied.

 

Introduction

 
Dental caries is one of the three most common infectious diseases in the world today.1  Several recent studies in Western world indicate that, although the caries prevalence has decreased markedly in children and adults up to the age of 40, the overall risk for caries in older age groups has not decreased appreciably.1-8 In some third world countries like China, the caries experience is very low.9  However, the caries prevalence is very high in countries such as Pakistan10, Jordan11 and Kuwait12.

Al-Shammery et al.13,14 have conducted comprehensive oral health studies in children and adults for several regions of Saudi Arabia. There are only few other caries prevalence studies15,16 in the Saudi adult population. However, no data are available for caries prevalence of adult population in Al-Ahsa Region, which is located in the Eastern part of Saudi Arabia. Such data are of vital importance in planning for dental health care services (both restorative and preventive) in the area. Therefore, there was a need to obtain some information on the prevalence of dental caries in the adult population of this area. A hospital-based study was conducted in 1998 in Al-Ahsa Region to determine the prevalence and severity of dental caries, treatment and prosthetic needs among its adult population. The prevalence and severity of dental caries data are presented in this article.
 
Subjects and Methods

 

Al-Ahsa is the largest oasis in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and is located between the Arabian Gulf coast and the Al-Dahna and Al-Daman deserts in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. The area is very famous for its dates and has about two millions date-palm trees.17

All the patients who attended the dental center during the last four months of 1998 were selected for the study. The sample comprised of five hundred and forty-four adult patients who were  examined for dental caries using WHO criteria for diagnosis of dental caries.18 Two examiners (one male and one female) were trained and calibrated by a senior faculty member of King Saud University, College of Dentistry, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The patients were examined on a dental chair at Al-Ahsa Dental Center. A fiber-optic light source with interchangeable disposable mirror head was utilized for the examination. The dental explorer was used sparingly on doubtful surfaces. In case of any doubt, the tooth was marked as sound. No radiographs were taken. Ten percent of subjects were recalled after one week to determine the consistency of the examiners.

Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS Windows version 10.0) was utilized to compute the descriptive statistics. The t-test was used to compare the mean DMFT between gender (male/female) and area of residence (urban/rural). The analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey Post Hoc multiple range test were employed to compare the severity of caries between age groups. Chi-square test was carried out to test the relationship of gender, area of residence and age groups with caries prevalence.

Kappa methods were used to determine inter-examiner agreement. There was a very high degree of agreement between the reference examiner and the two investigators (97.7% for the male examiner and 95.1% for the female examiner) for decayed, missing and filled teeth. The intra-examiner reliability of repeated subjects for male and female investigators was found to be 98.9% and 94.8%, respectively.
 
Results

 

The mean age of 544 patients was 42.68±18.06 years (Range: 13-102 years). The gender distribution was 230 males (42.3%, age range 14-102 years, mean 48.37 + 19.61)) and 314 females (57.7%, age range 13-85 years, mean 38.53 + 15.62). Table 1 describes the age distribution by gender and area of residence. Significantly higher percentage (24%) were males than females (8.3%) at the age groups above 61 years, and there were more urban patients (18.1%) in the sample than rural patients (7.4%) in this age group.

Caries Prevalence (Table 2)

Only 10.8% of the patients were caries free. There was no significant difference in overall caries prevalence (P = 0.792) between male (89.6%) and female (88.9%) patients. However, the prevalence of decayed and filled teeth was significantly higher in female than male patients with P values of 0.005 and 0.001, respectively.  Similarly, there was no significant difference (P = 0.838) in overall caries prevalence between urban (89.0%) and rural (89.2) patients. However, rural patients showed higher (P < 0.0001) prevalence of decayed teeth than the urban patients. The overall caries prevalence and the subjects with missing teeth increased significantly (P < 0.0001) with age. More than half (51.8%) of the patients had at least one decayed tooth, and four in every five (80%) had at least one missing tooth. Only one in five (19.5%) patients had at least one filled tooth.

Caries Severity (Table 3)

The overall mean DMFT score of all the patients was 13.24±11.53. The mean DMFT score of male and female patients was 15.24±12.73 and 11.77±10.35 respectively, which was different significantly (P = 0.001). However, when the comparison was conducted between males and females in each age group, no statistical significance was observed because the age-group had a confounding effect as shown in Table 1. Furthermore, decayed and filled teeth components of mean DMFT scores were higher in female patients with P values of 0.005 and 0.002, respectively. Since, many epidemiological studies consider DMFT with and without 3rd molars to cover impacted and unerupted 3rd molars. Therefore, DMFT without 3rd molars was also computed. The mean DMFT score of males and females excluding the 3rd molars was 12.79±11.36 and 9.39±9.30, respectively. The difference of above two means was highly significant (P<0.0001).  However, there was no significant difference when this DMFT was compared for each age group. The mean DMFT score of urban patients (14.03±12.11) was significantly higher (P = 0.008) than rural patients (11.39±9.84). The patients from rural areas showed significantly higher (P < 0.0001) mean decayed teeth as compared to patients from urban areas, while urban patients showed significantly higher (P < 0.0001) mean missing teeth than their rural counterparts. The mean DMFT score increased across the age groups with a linear relationship between DMFT score and age. The decayed and filled teeth components of the DMFT score significantly decreased after the age of 50 years, while the missing teeth component took a significant jump during this period (P < 0.0001). The DMFT without the 3rd molar showed the same pattern with age groups as the total DMFT.

Edentulous Patients (Table 4)

About 17% of the patients were edentulous. Among the age group of 41-50 years, 18.1% did not have any teeth, while in patients who were 61 year of age or higher, 56.8% were edentulous.  Male patients (25.7%) and those from urban (21.3%) areas showed significantly higher percentage (P< 0.0001) of edentulism  compared with female (10.2%) and rural patients (6.1%). However, within each age group, no significant differences were observed in relation to gender and area of residence, with the exception of age group of 51-60 years for area of residence.

 
Discussion

 

The study was conducted on a convenient sample of patients attending the dental center of Al-Ahsa region. The results should therefore be read with caution. Since there were no such data available in the literature, to the authors' best knowledge, in cross-sectional or hospital based study from this region,  the study therefore provides useful preliminary information about caries prevalence and severity in adult dental patients from Al-Ahsa region. The results indicate a very high caries experience in the study population. This information will help in dental health care planning for the adult population.

The present study has shown a high caries prevalence when compared to  studies from other countries.3,4,8,9,12  This study, which was first of its kind in Al-Ahsa region, showed even higher mean DMFT scores when compared to other Saudi studies.13,14 However, such a high caries prevalence could be attributed to the nature of sample, which consisted of patients attending a dental center.  The mean DMFT scores of this study are quite close to the scores reported in the study carried out in Riyadh15, which had the same setup as the present study.

The study showed that the mean DMFT score in males was not significantly different from that of females, if the confounding effect of age were taken out, which is in agreement with the previous studies.14,15  The missing teeth component was the main cause for the higher DMFT value in males. However, when the confounding effect of age were taken out, there was no significant difference  between the genders.

The result showed the influence of area of residence on caries prevalence of a person. Adults living in urban areas were more likely to have experienced dental caries and become edentulous. Several other studies have reported higher DMFT value for urban patients.13-15  However, the result of this study of more edentulous patients in urban areas than rural areas do not agree with earlier Saudi as well as United States data.14,19 In fact, Al-Shammery et al.14 showed that there was no significant difference between male/female and urban/rural individuals in relation to the presence of permanent teeth in older age groups. The different finding in this study could be due to recent changes in the dietary habits in urban areas, resulting in more caries and periodontal diseases and consequently more tooth loss. The mean filled teeth components for urban and rural adults were not significantly different, indicating comparable services in both areas.

The progression of DMFT with increasing age is a universal fact. However, this study showed a very high mean missing teeth for the patients aged 51 years or above which is very different when compared to all other studies. Again, such a high figure could be due to the convenient nature of the study sample, i.e. patients attending a dental center. Only few patients who visited the dental center were free of caries experience and majority of them was less than 30 years of age. However, the caries prevalence was the same in male/female and urban/rural patients, indicating a homogeneous nature of sample in relation to gender and area of residence.

One-sixth of the patients who visited the dental center during the study period were edentulous. The Al-Ahsa Dental Center is a tertiary care institution, and patients are referred here for advanced treatment such as full dentures. Hence, a large number of edentulous patients were seen in the sample.
 
Conclusion

 

In conclusion, the caries prevalence and severity in adult patients attending Al-Ahsa Dental Center was very high. The need for oral health care is evident in all the age groups. However, it will be unrealistic to try to control oral diseases by traditional curative methods only. Continuous efforts are required to implement community-based public awareness and preventive programs. For long term planning, the problem needs to be controlled at the school level. If public awareness is continuously reinforced, it is expected that the present trends could be reversed as has happened in developed countries.

 

Acknowledgement
 
The authors are grateful to the Ministry of Health, Al-Ahsa Region, especially the previous Director of Health Affairs of Al-Ahsa Region, Dr. Abdul Ellah Al-Nafeh, for his cooperation. We are also thankful to Dr. Mahmood El-Backly for training and calibrating the examiners. Likewise, we extend our gratitude to Drs. Mohammad Sulaiman and Glory Kigis-Malang for the data collection.

References

 

  1. Anusavice KJ. Dental caries: Risk assessment and treatment solutions for an elderly population. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2002; 23: 12-20.
  2. Arcella D, Ottolenghi L, Polimeni A, Leclercq C. The relationship between frequency of carbohydrates intake and dental caries: A cross-sectional study in Italian teenagers. Public Health Nutr 2002; 5: 553-560.
  3. Menghani  G, Steiner M, Helfenstein U, Imfeld C. Dental Health of adults in the Zurich Canton. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 2002; 112: 708-717.
  4. Hymen JJ, Reid BC. Epidemiological risk factors for periodontal attachment loss among adults in the United States. J Clin Periodontal 2003; 30: 230-237.
  5. Paulander  J, Axelesson P, Lindhe J. Association between level of education and oral health status in 35-, 50-, 65- and 75-year-old. J Clin Periodontal 2003; 30: 697-704.
  6. Hopecraft MS, Morgan MV. Exposure to fluoridated drinking water and dental caries experience in Australian army recruits, 1996. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2003; 31: 68-74.
  7. Onana J, Bitha T, Bengondo C, Djoumessi A.  Epidemiologic study of the oral health of the nursing staff of the Hospital Militaire de Yaounde.  Odontostomatol Trop 2002; 25: 38-42.
  8. Brown LJ, Wall TP, Lazar V. Trends in caries among 18 to 45 years old. J Am Dent Assoc 2002: 133: 827-834.
  9. Wang HY, Poul EP, Jin-You B, Bo-Xue Z. The second national survey of oral health status of children and adults in China. Int Dent J 2002; 52: 283-290.
  10. Maher R. Dental disorders in Pakistan - A national pathfinder study. J Pak Med Assoc 1991; 41: 250-252.
  11. Al-Wahadni A, Al-Omari MA. Dental diseases in a Jordanian population on renal dialysis. Quintessence Int. 2003; 34: 343-347.
  12. Behbehani JM, Shah NM. Oral health in Kuwait before the Gulf War. Med Princ Pract 2002; 11 Suppl 1: 36-43.
  13. Al-Shammery A, Guile E, El-Backly M, Lamborne A. An oral health survey of Saudi Arabia: Phase I (Riyadh). King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology 1991.
  14. Al- Shammery A, Guile E, El-Backly M, Al-Sulaimani S. Oral health survey of Saudi Arabia 1991 - 1994. King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (Unpublished report, Personal communication).
  15. Almas K, Al Jasser N. Prevalence of dental caries and periodontal disease in a Saudi population. Saudi Med J 1996; 17: 640-644.
  16. Almas K, Afzal M, Shakir ZF. Prevalence of dental caries in Al Qaseem region, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Pakistan Oral Dent J 1993; 13: 19-27.
  17. Ministry of Information, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This is our country 1996, pp. 112-117.
  18. World Health Organization (WHO). Oral health surveys. Basic Methods. 3rd ed., Geneva, 1987.
  19. Vargas CM, Yellowwitz JA, Hayes KL. Oral health status of older adults in the United States. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134: 479-486.

 

Address reprint requests to:

Dr. Nazeer Khan
Department of Preventive Dental Sciences
College of Dentistry, King Saud University
P.O. Box 60169, Riyadh 11545, KSA
email: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

 

Tables

 

 

Table 1. Age distribution by gender and area of residence

 

 

Age group (years)

Total

Factor

≤ 20

21 - 30

31 - 40

41 - 50

51 - 60

≥ 61

Gender

Male

22 (9.6)

33 (14.4)

26 (11.4)

44 (19.2)

49 (21.4)

55 (24.0)

229 (42.2)

Female

35 (11.1)

88 (28.0)

75 (23.9)

39 (12.4)

51 (16.2)

26 (8.3)

314 (57.8)

Area of residence

Urban

38 (10.0)

83 (21.8)

66 (17.3)

63 (16.5)

62 (16.3)

69 (18.1)

381 (70.2)

Rural

19 (11.7)

38 (23.5)

35 (21.6)

20 (12.3)

38 (23.5)

12 (7.4)

162 (29.8)

Total

57 (10.0)

121 (22.3)

101 (18.6)

83 (15.3)

100 (18.4)

81 (14.9)

543

 

 

Table 2. Number and percentage distribution of DMFT by gender, area of residence and age.

 

Gender

Area

Age-group

Total (%)

Male

(%)

Female

(%)

P value

Urban

(%)

Rural

(%)

P value

≤ 30

(%)

31- 50

(%)

≥ 51

(%)

P value

Decay

44.8

57.0

0.005

46.5

64.4

<0.0001

53.9

60.3

41.4

0.001

51.8

Missing

78.7

78.3

0.921

79.0

77.3

0.658

48.9

87.0

99.4

<0.0001

79.5

Filled

13.0

24.2

0.001

21.3

15.3

0.110

28.7

26.1

3.9

<0.0001

19.5

DMFT

89.6

88.9

0.792

89.0

89.2

0.838

75.3

92.4

100.0

<0.0001

89.2

 

 

Table 3. Distribution of DMFT and its components by gender, area of residence and age.

 

 

Gender

Area

Age – group

Total

n=544

Male n=230

Female n=314

P value

Urban    n=381

Rural n=163

P value

≤ 30

31 – 50

≥ 51

P value

Decay

 

SD

1.63

2.91

2.40

3.47

0.005

1.64

2.79

3.12

3.98

<0.0001

1.89ab

3.01

2.59a

3.70

1.76b

2.98

0.034

2.08

3.26

Missing

 

SD

13.29

13.13

8.68

10.32

< 0.0001

11.98

12.64

7.79

8.97

<0.0001

1.91a

3.53

8.21b

9.07

21.71c

10.90

<0.0001

10.63

11.80

Filled

 

SD

0.32

1.08

0.69

1.67

0.002

0.56

1.43

0.48

1.54

0.586

0.75a

1.75

0.77a

1.68

0.09b

0.49

<0.0001

0.54

1.46

DMFT

 

SD

15.24

12.73

11.77

10.35

0.001

14.03

12.11

11.39

9.84

0.008

4.55a

5.47

11.57b

9.57

23.56c

9.66

<0.0001

13.24

11.53

DMFT without 3rd molar

 

SD

12.79

11.36

9.39

9.30

<0.0001

11.56

10.90

9.13

8.72

0.006

3.36a

4.64

9.02b

8.66

20.08c

8.98

<0.0001

10.85

10.35

 

 

Table 4.  Number and percentage of edentulous patients in relation to gender and area of residence

 

≤ 40 years

41 – 50 years1

51 – 60 years

≥ 61 years

Total2

 

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

Gender

Male

0 (0.0)

9 (20.5)

16 (32.7)

34 (61.8)

59 (25.7)

Female

0 (0.0)

6 (15.4)

14 (27.5)

12 (46.2)

32 (10.2)

P value

0.549

0.570

0.184

< 0.0001

Area

Urban

0 (0.0)

14 (22.2)

25 (40.3)

42 (60.9)

81(21.3)

Rural

0 (0.0)

1 (5.0)

5 (13.2)

4 (33.3)

10 (6.1)

P value

0.081

0.004

0.076

< 0.0001

Total

0 (0.0)

15 (18.1)

30 (30.0)

46 (56.8)

91 (16.7)

 

1 Percentages are within the age group, e.g. 20.5% of males of 41-50 years old were edentulous.
2 Percentages are within the demographic factor; e.g. 25.7% of the males were edentulous.

 
Website designed and maintained by DeltaCAS