|
001.Quality assurance and benchmarking in dental education
Prof.
ALPHONS J.M. PLASSCHAERT
College of Dental Sciences, University Medical
Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
There is a global trend in which many countries,
national systems, institutions and procedures have been set up to promote
quality in higher education. This is particularly true in dental education in
which Quality Assurance (QA) and Benchmarking have an important part to play.
In the context of Europe, the European Union
(EU) has set out guidelines for quality assessment and quality assurance in
higher education. This in turn will help to ensure that dental education is delivered
across Europe in a consistent high standard
and with patient care and protection being of paramount importance.
It is recognized that Quality Assurance in dental schools
has to co-exist as part of established Quality Assurance systems within faculties
and universities, and that schools also may have to comply with existing local
or national systems.
Since there must be more than one road to achieve
convergence or harmonization of standards, a series of ‘toolkits' from which
schools can ‘pick and choose' to assist them in developing QA systems
appropriate to their own environment will be presented. It is realized that not
all schools will be able to achieve all of these requirements immediately, by
definition, successful harmonization is a process that will take time.
One important element that supports harmonized QA in the
European Higher Education area is the opportunity for properly structured (and
appropriately recognized) student exchange within the dental curriculum. In
addition, it will also help confirm that EU dental schools are providing high
quality research-led education, learning opportunities and experience to all
students, so that they may then achieve a consistently high degree of
professional excellence in an internationally recognized institution.
Perhaps of greatest importance are the fourteen
‘requirements' for the Quality Assurance of Dental Education in Europe. These, together with the document and its
appendices, were unanimously supported by the Association for Dental Education
in Europe (ADEE) at its General Assembly in 2006.
In this presentation,
definitions of Quality, Quality Assurance, Quality Management, Quality
Improvement and Accreditation are explained and polymerized into a formula of
enhancing dental education.
Saudi Dental Journal 2007;19(SI)-Abstr.001
002.
Rehabilitation of the
atrophic jaws: Preprosthetic surgery and implants
Prof. THOMAS KREUSCH
Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Kiel ,Head, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial
Plastic Surgery
Head and Neck Center,
Asklepios Klinik Nord, Campus Heidberg, Hamburg, Germany
The atrophic upper and
lower jaw is a problem for good esthetics and sufficient function. Different means of
preprosthetic surgery can improve the situation. In many cases, implants are
the solution with good long term results. In patients with sufficient bone height
and widths, implants can be placed easily, early loading can be performed. In
cases of heavy atrophy, bone augmentations have to be performed to get a
sufficient amount of bone for implants. The autologous bone as a graft from the
iliac crest where the gold standard in maxillofacial surgery. Bony integration
has to take place before implants are placed. Osseointegration takes place
within 3 - 6 months. Different techniques are demonstrated, treatment concepts
are presented. A good cooperation between the surgeon, the prosthodontist and
the patient is necessary.
Saudi Dental Journal 2007;19(SI)-Abstr.002
003.
CAD-CAM technology: The
latest trend in prosthetic dentistry
Dr. GERHARD KULTERMANN
Head, Customer Information Center, 3M ESPE ,Consultant Dental Expert for Research and Development, Seefeld, Germany
Zirconium-Oxide ceramics are not
new to medicine. Since many years ago, this material is used for replacement of
joints in human bodies. The physical and aesthetic properties of Zirconium-Oxide
material combined with the CAD-CAM technology have made it a fascinating
material to use for prosthetic restorations in dentistry. Topics covered are: Full
ceramic materials in dentistry. What can Zirconium-Oxide offer? The LAVA System from 3M ESPE. How to design the tooth
preparation? Advantages of milling in pre-sintered phase. Can a machine deliver
perfect fit? What about aesthetic? Clinical cases will also be presente
Saudi Dental Journal 2007;19(SI)-Abstr.003
004.
Prime quality with zirconia
implant prosthetics: When biocompatibility and fracture toughness harmonize with ultimate light dynamics
Dr. PETER UWE GEHRKE
Associate in Private Practice limited to Implant Dentistry and Oral
Surgery, Ludwigshafen, Germany
Predictable osseointegration has taken the role of
implant dentistry beyond the mere restoration of function for the compromised
edentulous and partially edentulous patient to an accelerated and esthetic
treatment approach for implant-supported restorations. Accelerated function and
the pursuit of reducing the all-over treatment time is obviously essential for
the final patient satisfaction, but implant treatment planning should never be
focused around function improvements alone. The ultimate goal is the
achievement of a pleasing smile architecture considering the proper proportion
and relation of the implant restoration according to established principles. In
addition, all restorative techniques available and adjunctive periodontal soft
tissue procedures need to be applied to compensate for anatomical
irregularities at the site. This allows for an implant restoration that mimics
that of a natural tooth. Although metal implant abutments have inherent
esthetic disadvantages, they are most widely considered a standard treatment
option for implant supported restorations. The art of looking naturally,
however, has been perfected by ceramics. Its application in implant
prosthodontics has opened up a new era in esthetic tooth replacement. Improved
material characteristics, complying with clinicians' and patients' increased
demands for highly esthetic results, have contributed significantly to the
development of a new generation of implant abutments made from
zirconium-dioxide noted for their tooth-like color, high load strength, tissue
tolerability and intra-sulcular design enhancement. The phenomenon of
transformation toughening of zirconium-dioxide results in extremely high
component strength, extraordinary bending and tensile strength as well as
fracture and chemical resistance. The presentation will highlight
the natural symbiosis of a functional and esthetic treatment approach,
considering surgical and restorative implant design aspects, as well as
abutment shape and material characteristics.
Saudi Dental Journal 2007;19(SI)-Abstr.004
005.
Smile enhancement
through osseointegrated implants: Technologies and techniques beyond the mere
fixture
Dr.
PETER UWE GEHRKE
Associate in Private Practice, Limited to Implant Dentistry and Oral
Surgery, Ludwigshafen, Germany
Accelerated function and the
pursuit of reducing the all-over treatment time is obviously essential for the
final patient satisfaction, therefore fundamental parameters to shorten the
initially recommended implant therapy are of common interest. Implant macro- and micro-design are widely
recognized as being of fundamental importance in achieving long-term success.
As such, extensive research has been performed in order to determine the
implant surface texture necessary to attain an optimal bone-implant
biomechanical interlock. Four interrelated properties of an implant surface
affect osteogenic activity: chemical composition, surface energy, surface
roughness, and surface morphology. Methods of enhancing the implant surface
include alteration of the microstructure and modification of its physiochemical
parameters, including surface-free energy and wettability. Recently,
a novel enhanced implant surface has been introduced obtained by grit-blasting
and a new acid-etching technique at elevated temperatures. Data from
several studies suggest that this microstructured surface influences
a number of events in the process of osseointegration, resulting in the production of a
more rapid bone response and increased bone to implant contact, due to its
specific morphology, wettability, and energy. Its clinical
impact on immediate functional and non-functional loading will be critically
discussed.
Saudi Dental Journal 2007;19(SI)-Abstr.005
|