OOPS. Your Flash player is missing or outdated.Click here to update your player so you can see this content.
ISSN (Print) 1013-9052
EISSN 1658-3558
The Saudi Dental Journal,
P.O. Box 52500,
Riyadh 11563,
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Tel.
966-1-467-7328
Fax.
933-1-467-7308 /
966-1-467-7534
Email
saudidj@ksu.edu.sa

SDJ arrow Search SDJ

026. The oral and maxillofacial trauma

Dr. HAMED H. AL-BARGI
Consultant in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental OMFS Division, King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
The oral and maxillofacial trauma presents a unique population in that both their injuries and the mechanisms of repair may have a direct adverse effect on their ability to receive adequate nutrition. Consequently, many can develop anemia, vitamin deficiencies and weight loss due to fat and muscles wasting. Healthy, well developed and well nourished patient generally have sufficient body stores to withstand surgical stress and starvation for 7 to 10 days. The normal response to a traumatic injury is an inflammatory reaction that usually peaks by the third day and abates by the seventh to tenth day after injury. The metabolic response mobilizes amino acids from lean tissue to support wound healing, immunologic response, and protein synthesis. This hyper metabolism can lead to multiorgan failure if not corrected or if complicated by further injury such as sepsis. The goal of early intervention is to maintain host defenses and preserve lean body mass. An accurate history of the traumatic incident is important in helping to arrive at a final diagnosis. The type, intensity, duration, and direction of force can be important clues in elucidating suspected areas of fracture in the oral and maxillofacial region. The mechanisms of injury in the oral and maxillofacial region are dominated by motor vehicular accident followed by altercation gun shot wound and others.

Saudi Dental Journal 2007;19(SI)-Abstr.026


027. Implant retained auricular prostheses

Dr. WALID SADIG
Chairman, Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Prosthetic replacement of missing ear can provide excellent cosmetic results. Unfortunately, the absence of anatomic irregularities often results in unfavorable adhesive retention of an auricular prosthesis. Alternatively, endosseous implants specifically designed to be placed in the temporal bone permit positive retention, easy orientation, prolonged longevity and improved hearing conductivity. The stages of reconstruction demand an interdisciplinary team approach. This presentation described a detailed step by step surgical and prosthetic procedure of fabricating an implant retained auricular prostheses for Saudi patients who lost their ears in a motor vehicle trauma.


Saudi Dental Journal 2007;19(SI)-Abstr.027

028 Periodontal plastic surgery: An update

Prof. NADIR BABAY
Professor in Periodontics, Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University , Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
The main goal of periodontal therapy is to improve periodontal health and thereby to maintain a patient's functional dentition throughout his/her life. However, aesthetic represents an inseparable part of today's oral therapy and several procedures have been proposed to preserve or enhance patient aesthetics. Mucogingival surgery evolved into periodontal plastic surgery first suggested by Miller in 1988 with various techniques designed to produce root coverage in areas of marginal tissue recession, to augment deficient ridges, lengthen crowns in cases of excessive gingival display, prepare the periodontium for restorative dentistry, and  reconstruct and preserve the gingiva papilla in dental implant therapy, . Periodontal plastic surgery not only enables the dentist to reconstruct but also to regenerate lost tissues. This new term encompasses a much broader definition which more accurately reflects the current evolution in surgical techniques which enhances the function and esthetics of the periodontal tissues enabling the patient to improve the appearance of the smile. The available plastic surgery procedures and their clinical applications will be reviewed in this presentation with an emphasis placed on factors to consider for proper case selection and ideal treatment planning.

Saudi Dental Journal 2007;19(SI)-Abstr.028


029. Single tooth replacement with implant vs. conventional strategy
Dr. ABDULLAH S. AL KERAIDIS
Consultant in Prosthodontics and Implant, Director, Riyadh Dental Center , Riyadh Medical Complex, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia


A fixed partial denture (FPD) is an important prosthetic option in prosthodontic treatment in case of a single missing tooth.  The conventional fixed prosthesis must fulfill biological, mechanical, and esthetic requirements to be considered successful. The high success rate of osseointegrated implant cause the practitioner to think of using single implant to support a missing crown which also reduce or eliminate the severe loss of enamel of the neighbouring natural teeth. For many years, osseointegrated implant research has basically been focused on the osseous inter-face and its functional capacity. Recently, attention has been given to the tissues that surrounded the implant, providing a biological seal.  So, implant that support single tooth must also fulfill a biological, mechanical and esthetic requirements to be considered successful. A twenty minutes presentation with clinical cases will elaborate the implant criteria to help the practitioner the best way to choose between the two prosthetic options based on clinical literature evidence.

Saudi Dental Journal 2007;19(SI)-Abstr.029


030. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentin following use of Hero Shaper and Race rotary Ni-Ti systems

Prof. RAJAB E. SAIF
Professor, Conservative Dental Science Department, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz UniversityJeddah, Saudi Arabia

This study was undertaken to evaluate using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) root canal walls following preparation in vitro using two different rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Statistically significant (P<0.01) was found between the apical third, middle third, and coronal thirds for both groups. No difference was observable between instrumentation groups. These data revealed that both instruments produced a clean and debris-free canal in the coronal and middle thirds but were unable to produce dentin surface-free from smear and debris in the apical third.


Saudi Dental Journal 2007;19(SI)-Abstr.030

 
Website designed and maintained by DeltaCAS