• JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator

ISSN (Print) 1013-9052
EISSN 1658-3558

The Saudi Dental Journal,
P.O. Box 52500,
Riyadh 11563,
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Tel.
966-1-467-7328
Fax.
933-1-467-7308 /
966-1-467-7534
Email
saudidj@ksu.edu.sa

2009-21-01-45-50-full

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in management of severe
dry socket pain

Abdelamajeed Abdellateef,* BDS, MSc Jamil Elrefai,** MD Omar Al-Jadid,§ BDS, MSc
Amjad Alabbadi,*** BDS, MSc

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the role and efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in the treatment of pain resulting from dry socket. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2006 to May 2007, 25 patients who had been diagnosed by the oral surgeon in the Dental Department of Princess Haya Hospital, Aqaba, Jordan with dry socket with severe intolerable pain, untreated with the classical treatments, were treated with HBOT. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (60%) were treated in a single HBOT session after which an almost complete resolution of pain took place, 7 patients (28%) were treated in 2 sessions and 3 patients (12%) needed 3 HBOT sessions to cure the pain. CONCLUSION: This preliminary study to assess the role of HBOT in the treatment of dry socket pain showed a great reduction of pain intensity of dry socket following administration of HBOT.

Introduction

Dry socket is considered as one of the most common complications of tooth extraction and is characterized by severe pain, halitosis and destruction of the blood clot,1,2 starting usually on the second or third day postoperatively. Its prevalence has been reported to vary from 0% 3 to more than 35% 4 and is more common following mandibular third molar extraction.5-11 Patients experience pain and may experience loss of productivity. This makes the condition costly to both the patient and the society, as 45% of patients require multiple postoperative visits in the process of managing this painful condition.12

The exact pathogenesis of dry socket is not well understood, however, disintegration of the blood clot by fibrinolysis remains the most widely accepted theory.13 Several contributing factors had been reported to be associated with an increased risk of dry socket. They include traumatic extraction,2-4,11 preoperative infection,11,12 smoking,13 gender,11,14 site of extraction,8,14 use of oral contraceptives,15 and many other factors. Efforts have been made to define the condition more accurately through the use of the terms such as alveolar osteitis, alveolitis, localized osteitis, localized osteomyelitis, post extraction osteomyelitis syndrome, alveolalgia, alveolitis   sicca   dolorosa,   a   vascular socket, leeren alveole, necrotic socket and fibrinolytic alveolitis. However, the term dry socket is still the most common term used for this condition.7, 13

Although not the rule, some authors do not accept speaking of dry socket treatment as long as its etiology is not properly known. The treatment can only aim to control the pain during the period of cure of the affection and this is mainly achieved by means of palliative measures.16 The treatment modalities that have been proposed by many authors 17, 18 include the following:
1.    Pain reducing dressings, including traditional remedies such as zinc oxide-eugenol packs
2.    Anti-infective agents
3.    Anti-fibrinolytic agents
4.    Surgical intervention to remove necrotic material and to form a new blood clot. The most widely used technique to relieve pain of dry socket is the traditional methods of normal saline irrigation and placement of one of the available commercial dressing such as Alvogyl® iodoform dressing along with prescriptions of analgesics and systemic antibiotics for some patients. However, whatever the treatment modality prescribed, the patient is usually required to attend the clinic several times for the purpose of irrigation and redressing till complete resolution takes place.18

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is a treatment modality during which a patient breathes 100% oxygen inside a closed chamber pressurized above 1 atmosphere absolute (ATA).19 The concentration of oxygen in the atmosphere is 21%. At 1 ATA, the oxygen in blood is almost entirely carried by hemoglobin. Because hemoglobin is approximately 97% saturated under normal conditions, increasing greatly the oxygen-carrying capacity of blood by increasing hemoglobin saturation is not possible. Inhalation of HBO can enhance the amount of oxygen carried in blood by increasing the quantity of oxygen dissolved in the plasma.

Oxygen has a solubility of 0.014/mL of plasma at 1 ATA and 37°C. At 1 ATA, the amount of dissolved oxygen in 100 ml of plasma is 0.449 ml which can be increased to approximately 1.5 ml when breathing 100% oxygen at normobaric (ambient) pressure. When inhaling 100% oxygen at 3 ATA, the amount of dissolved oxygen in 100 ml of plasma increases to 6.422 ml, which is enough to meet the basic metabolic needs of the human body.20, 21

The driving force for oxygen diffusion from the capillaries to the tissues can be estimated by the difference between the partial pressure of oxygen on the arterial side and the venous side of the capillaries. The difference in the partial pressure of oxygen from the arterial side to the venous side of the capillary system is approximately 37 times greater when breathing 100% oxygen at 3 ATA than air at 1 ATA.22

Many authors 22-24 reported the following benefits during applying HBOT:

  1. The increased oxygen diffusion levels during HBOT ends up in an increase in the tissue oxygenation. Thus, it can support poorly perfused and hypoxic areas.
  2. Increased tissue oxygenation enhances polymorphonuclear cell bactericidal activity.
  3. HBOT alone is bactericidal to strictly anaerobic organisms and bacteriostatic to many microaerophilic organisms and some species of Escherichia and Pseudomonas.
  4. Oxygen concentrations can increase some antibiotics activity especially those who do not work properly in an anaerobic environment.
  5. Increasing tissue oxygenation in abnormally low tissue oxygen has been shown to accelerate healing by increasing the fibroblast synthesis of collagen matrix which is essential for neovascularization by capillary in-growth in hypoxic or poorly perfused tissues, and this is of clinical importance when treating many conditions as in case of irradiated tissues.
Materials and Methods
From January 2006 to May 2007, 25 patients who were diagnosed with extremely painful (9-10 on the suggested pain scale) dry socket that could not be relieved by conventional treatment and analgesics were treated with HBOT (Table 1). The HBOT sessions took place in our multiplace hyperbaric chamber at Princess Haya Hospital (PHH) in Aqaba, Jordan (Fig. 1). The rest who reported lower pain severity had to be treated in the conventional way. All patients who had to receive HBOT were asked not to take any medication either analgesics or antibiotics after each session.

Due to hazards of fire and treatment safety, patients were requested to wear cotton dress, sit or to recline on the chair, breathe 100% oxygen through a face fitted mask after reaching the bottom of dive profile at 3 ATA. The total time required for each session was about 2 hours (Fig. 2). The first session started the same day the patient came, the second session if needed, started immediately after the first session and in the same day. A third session if needed was carried out in the morning of the day after. After each session of HBOT, the patients were asked to report the intensity of pain according to the numerical pain scale. Improvement was considered to be achieved whenever the patient reported 0 or 1-2 on the suggested pain scale.


Results

Fifteen patients (60%) who were treated with single HBOT session indicated that pain almost completely disappeared, while pain disappeared completely in 7 patients (28%) who had two sessions and 3 patients (12%) who had 3 sessions of  HBOT.

Table 2, 3 and 4 illustrate the number of HBOT sessions and the degree of improvement reported by the patients after each session.


Discussion
As indicated by many authors, the primary aim of dry socket management is pain control until commencement of normal healing, and in many cases, local measures might be able to reduce the severity of pain to a reasonable level. There are many others who could not tolerate such pain. However, systemic analgesics or antibiotics may be necessary in some cases. On the other hand, many patients who suffered from such pain did not benefit from this medication. In addition, the use of intra-alveolar dressing materials is widely suggested in the literature but its effect in relieving pain is limited to a short period of time and patients need periodic recall for redressing.16-18

Birn13 suggested the use of antifibrinolytic drugs in the treatment of pain due to its effect in inhibiting plasmin formation which leads to inhibition of formation of kinins. Kinin is the pain mediator in dry socket.

The Hyperbaric Oxygen Committee of Undersea Medical Society recognized the following medical and surgical conditions as the accepted conditions for HBOT:20-22
1.    Air or gas embolism
2.    Carbon monoxide/cyanide poisoning
3.    Crush injury and other acute traumatic ischemia
4.    Decompression sickness
5.    Enhancement of healing of selected problem wounds and skin grafts
6.    Gas gangrene
7.    Necrotizing soft tissue actinomycosis, osteomyelitis and osteoradionecrosis

HBOT is increasingly being accepted as a beneficial adjunct to diverse clinical conditions. Non-healing ulcers, chronic wounds and refractory osteomyelitis are a few conditions for which HBOT has been extensively tried out. The dental surgeon also found a good ally in HBOT in managing dental conditions.22, 24

In the first group of the study sample, the results had clearly shown that pain intensity in 15 patients (60%) reduced dramatically   and   almost   disappeared after the first session of HBOT (Table 2).

In the second group, 7 patients received 2    HBOT sessions. In the 1st session, 5 patients reported reduction in pain intensity which reached 5-6 according to numerical pain scale (distressful pain) and the remaining 2 patients were still having the same intensity. Another session of HBO was prescribed for this group of patients to establish further improvement and by the end of the 2nd session, all the patients reported almost complete pain resolution (Table 3).

In the third group, where the remaining 3    patients received 3 HBOT sessions, all of them reported lack of complete relief after 1st and 2nd sessions. However, by the end of the 3rd session, all the patients reported almost complete disappearance of pain (Table 4).

This difference in the number of HBOT sessions may be due to the timing the patient sought help, whether they attended the dental clinic immediately after the onset of pain where the condition would be at its peak, or attended several days after the onset where they responded quicker to HBOT sessions than the others. Furthermore, it might be attributed to the pain threshold factor which varies from one person to another.

No attempt was made to use a control group to compare between the HBOT and the conventional technique in the treatment of pain as this study was designed to evaluate the role and effect of HBOT in reducing the pain intensity in dry socket cases.

From the economic point of view, this new technique in treatment of severe dry socket pain is considered to be costly because each session costs considerably more than the cost of conventional treatment. The advantages of HBOT are still considered superior to other methods as it relieves pain in a very short period. In addition, patients stop suffering, return to their normal life and productivity in a period not exceeding 30 hours. In other techniques, patient usually need multiple visits for redressing in the dental clinic in adjunction with the administration of different kinds of antibiotic as well as analgesics and usually, the patients still suffer from pain with varying degrees of severity for longer periods.

According to our best knowledge, this was the first study that was carried out to evaluate the efficacy of HBOT in the reduction of pain intensity in dry socket. Further investigations should be carried out to study the economic value of using this new technique compared to other conventional methods in treating dry socket pain and to assess the patient's convenience in this kind of treatment.

 

Conclusion
This preliminary study that was carried out to assess the role of HBOT in the treatment of dry socket pain showed a great reduction in pain intensity following administration of HBO therapy which might be used in the future as a rapid and quick technique to relieve pain and other kinds of pain of different origin.

 

References
    1. Awang M. The etiology of dry socket: A review. Int Dent J 1989; 39: 236-239.
    2. Rood JP, Murgatroyd J. Metronidazole in the prevention of dry socket. Br J Oral Surg 1979; 17: 62-70.
    3. Petri WH, Wilson TM. Clinical evaluation of antibiotic supplemented bone allograft. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992; 51: 982¬987.
    4. Erickson RT, Wait DE, Wilkison RH. A study of dry sockets. Oral Surg 1960; 13: 1046-1050.
    5. Lilly GE, Osborn DB, Rael EM, Samuels HS, Jones JC. Alveolar osteitis associated with mandibular third molar extractions. J Am Dent Assoc 1974; 88: 802-806.
    6. Alexander RE. Dental extraction wound management: A case against medicating post-extraction sockets. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 58: 538-551.
    7. Amaratunga NA, Senaratne CM. A clinical study of dry socket in Sri Lanka. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988; 26: 410-418.
    8. Field EA, Speechley JA, Rotter E, Scott J. Dry socket incidence compared after a 12-year interval. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1985; 23: 419-427.
    9. Jaffar N, Nor GM. The prevalence of post- extraction complications in an outpatient dental clinic in Kuala Lumpur Malaysia - A retrospective survey. Singapore Dent J 2000; 23: 24-28.
    10. Oginni FO, Fatusi OA, Alagbe AO. A clinical evaluation of dry socket in a Nigerian teaching hospital. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 61: 871-876.
    11. Bloomer CR. Alveolar osteitis prevention by immediate placement of medicated packing. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 90: 282-284.
    12. Larsen PE. Alveolar osteitis after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Identification of patients at risk. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992; 73: 393-397.
    13. Birn H. Etiology and pathogenesis of fibrinolytic alveolitis ('dry socket'). Int J Oral Surg 1973; 2: 215-263.
    14. Al-Khateeb TL, El-Marsafi AI, Butler NP. The relationship between the indications for the surgical removal of impacted third molars and the incidence of alveolar osteitis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991; 49:141-145.
    15. Sweet JB, Butler DP. The relationship of smoking to localized osteitis. J Oral Surg 1979; 37: 732-735.
    16. Fazakerley M, Field EN. Dry socket: A painful post-extraction complication (A review). Dent Update 1991; 18: 31-34.
    17. Mitchell R. Treatment of fibrinolytic alveolitis by a collagen paste (formula K). Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986, 15: 127¬133.
    18. Nusair YM, Abu Younis MH. Prevalence, clinical picture and risk factors of dry socket in Jordanian dental teaching centers. J Contemp Dent Practice 2007; 8: 212-220.
    19. Marx R. Bony reconstruction of the jaw. In: Kindwall EP, Whelan HT, editors. Hyperbaric medicine practice. 2nd edition. Flagstaff, AZ: Best Publishing 1999, p. 460.
    20. Weg CDR, Arvind S. Role of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in dental surgery. Ind J Aerospace Med 2003; 47: 23-29.
    21. Pasquier D, Hoelscher T, Schmutz J, Dische S, Mathieu D, Baumann M, Lartigau E. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the treatment of radio-induced lesions in normal tissues: A literature review. Radiother Oncol 2004; 72:1-13.
    22. Tibbles PM, Edelsberg JS. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy. New Eng J Med 1996;334: 1642-1648.
    23. David LA, Sandor GKB, Evans W, Brown DH. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy and mandibular osteoradionecrosis: A retrospective study and analysis of treatment outcomes. J Can Dent Assoc 2001; 67:384-392.
    24. Brown DA, Evans AW, Sandor GK. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the management of osteoradionecrosis of the mandible. Adv Otorhinolaryngology 1998; 54:14-32.
    25. Maier A, Gaggl A, Klemen H, Santler G, Anegg U, Fell B, Karcher H, Smolle- Juttner FM, Friehs GB. Review of severe osteoradionecrosis treated by surgery alone or surgery with postoperative hyperbaric   oxygenation.    Br   J   Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 38:173-176.

 

Tables and Figures

47-1

47-2

48-1

48-2

49-1


 
Website designed and maintained by DeltaCAS