| SDJ |
| Editorial Board |
| Advisory Board |
| Information for authors |
| Submit manuscript |
| Subscribe to SDJ |
| Search SDJ |
| About SDJ |
| SDJ Current Issue |
| Journal Archives |
ISSN (Print) 1013-9052
EISSN 1658-3558
P.O. Box 52500,
Riyadh 11563,
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| Tel. |
966-1-467-7328 |
| Fax. |
933-1-467-7308 / 966-1-467-7534 |
| Email |
saudidj@ksu.edu.sa |
| 2009-21-01-45-50-full |
|
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in management of severe dry socket pain Abdelamajeed Abdellateef,* BDS, MSc Jamil Elrefai,** MD Omar Al-Jadid,§ BDS, MSc Amjad Alabbadi,*** BDS, MSc
OBJECTIVE: To assess the role and efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in the treatment of pain resulting from dry socket. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2006 to May 2007, 25 patients who had been diagnosed by the oral surgeon in the Dental Department of Princess Haya Hospital, Aqaba, Jordan with dry socket with severe intolerable pain, untreated with the classical treatments, were treated with HBOT. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (60%) were treated in a single HBOT session after which an almost complete resolution of pain took place, 7 patients (28%) were treated in 2 sessions and 3 patients (12%) needed 3 HBOT sessions to cure the pain. CONCLUSION: This preliminary study to assess the role of HBOT in the treatment of dry socket pain showed a great reduction of pain intensity of dry socket following administration of HBOT.
Dry socket is considered as one of the most common complications of tooth extraction and is characterized by severe pain, halitosis and destruction of the blood clot,1,2 starting usually on the second or third day postoperatively. Its prevalence has been reported to vary from 0% 3 to more than 35% 4 and is more common following mandibular third molar extraction.5-11 Patients experience pain and may experience loss of productivity. This makes the condition costly to both the patient and the society, as 45% of patients require multiple postoperative visits in the process of managing this painful condition.12
From January 2006 to May 2007, 25 patients who were diagnosed with extremely painful (9-10 on the suggested pain scale) dry socket that could not be relieved by conventional treatment and analgesics were treated with HBOT (Table 1). The HBOT sessions took place in our multiplace hyperbaric chamber at Princess Haya Hospital (PHH) in Aqaba, Jordan (Fig. 1). The rest who reported lower pain severity had to be treated in the conventional way. All patients who had to receive HBOT were asked not to take any medication either analgesics or antibiotics after each session.
Due to hazards of fire and treatment safety, patients were requested to wear cotton dress, sit or to recline on the chair, breathe 100% oxygen through a face fitted mask after reaching the bottom of dive profile at 3 ATA. The total time required for each session was about 2 hours (Fig. 2). The first session started the same day the patient came, the second session if needed, started immediately after the first session and in the same day. A third session if needed was carried out in the morning of the day after. After each session of HBOT, the patients were asked to report the intensity of pain according to the numerical pain scale. Improvement was considered to be achieved whenever the patient reported 0 or 1-2 on the suggested pain scale.
Fifteen patients (60%) who were treated with single HBOT session indicated that pain almost completely disappeared, while pain disappeared completely in 7 patients (28%) who had two sessions and 3 patients (12%) who had 3 sessions of HBOT.
As indicated by many authors, the primary aim of dry socket management is pain control until commencement of normal healing, and in many cases, local measures might be able to reduce the severity of pain to a reasonable level. There are many others who could not tolerate such pain. However, systemic analgesics or antibiotics may be necessary in some cases. On the other hand, many patients who suffered from such pain did not benefit from this medication. In addition, the use of intra-alveolar dressing materials is widely suggested in the literature but its effect in relieving pain is limited to a short period of time and patients need periodic recall for redressing.16-18
Birn13 suggested the use of antifibrinolytic drugs in the treatment of pain due to its effect in inhibiting plasmin formation which leads to inhibition of formation of kinins. Kinin is the pain mediator in dry socket. The Hyperbaric Oxygen Committee of Undersea Medical Society recognized the following medical and surgical conditions as the accepted conditions for HBOT:20-22 1. Air or gas embolism 2. Carbon monoxide/cyanide poisoning 3. Crush injury and other acute traumatic ischemia 4. Decompression sickness 5. Enhancement of healing of selected problem wounds and skin grafts 6. Gas gangrene 7. Necrotizing soft tissue actinomycosis, osteomyelitis and osteoradionecrosis HBOT is increasingly being accepted as a beneficial adjunct to diverse clinical conditions. Non-healing ulcers, chronic wounds and refractory osteomyelitis are a few conditions for which HBOT has been extensively tried out. The dental surgeon also found a good ally in HBOT in managing dental conditions.22, 24 In the first group of the study sample, the results had clearly shown that pain intensity in 15 patients (60%) reduced dramatically and almost disappeared after the first session of HBOT (Table 2). In the second group, 7 patients received 2 HBOT sessions. In the 1st session, 5 patients reported reduction in pain intensity which reached 5-6 according to numerical pain scale (distressful pain) and the remaining 2 patients were still having the same intensity. Another session of HBO was prescribed for this group of patients to establish further improvement and by the end of the 2nd session, all the patients reported almost complete pain resolution (Table 3). In the third group, where the remaining 3 patients received 3 HBOT sessions, all of them reported lack of complete relief after 1st and 2nd sessions. However, by the end of the 3rd session, all the patients reported almost complete disappearance of pain (Table 4). This difference in the number of HBOT sessions may be due to the timing the patient sought help, whether they attended the dental clinic immediately after the onset of pain where the condition would be at its peak, or attended several days after the onset where they responded quicker to HBOT sessions than the others. Furthermore, it might be attributed to the pain threshold factor which varies from one person to another. No attempt was made to use a control group to compare between the HBOT and the conventional technique in the treatment of pain as this study was designed to evaluate the role and effect of HBOT in reducing the pain intensity in dry socket cases. From the economic point of view, this new technique in treatment of severe dry socket pain is considered to be costly because each session costs considerably more than the cost of conventional treatment. The advantages of HBOT are still considered superior to other methods as it relieves pain in a very short period. In addition, patients stop suffering, return to their normal life and productivity in a period not exceeding 30 hours. In other techniques, patient usually need multiple visits for redressing in the dental clinic in adjunction with the administration of different kinds of antibiotic as well as analgesics and usually, the patients still suffer from pain with varying degrees of severity for longer periods. According to our best knowledge, this was the first study that was carried out to evaluate the efficacy of HBOT in the reduction of pain intensity in dry socket. Further investigations should be carried out to study the economic value of using this new technique compared to other conventional methods in treating dry socket pain and to assess the patient's convenience in this kind of treatment.
This preliminary study that was carried out to assess the role of HBOT in the treatment of dry socket pain showed a great reduction in pain intensity following administration of HBO therapy which might be used in the future as a rapid and quick technique to relieve pain and other kinds of pain of different origin.
|











