| SDJ |
| Editorial Board |
| Advisory Board |
| Information for authors |
| Submit manuscript |
| Subscribe to SDJ |
| Search SDJ |
| About SDJ |
| SDJ Current Issue |
| Journal Archives |
| 2010-22 |
| 22-1 |
ISSN (Print) 1013-9052
EISSN 1658-3558
P.O. Box 52500,
Riyadh 11563,
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| Tel. |
966-1-467-7328 |
| Fax. |
933-1-467-7308 / 966-1-467-7534 |
| Email |
saudidj@ksu.edu.sa |
| 2009-21-01-51-56-full |
|
Multilocular ameloblastic fibro-odontoma. A case report in the
anterior maxilla Randa Al-Fotawei, BDS, FDS RCS
Ameloblastic fibro-odontoma is a benign, slow growing, expansile epithelial odontogenic tumor with odontogenic mesenchyme. Although it was reported in the earlier literature that ameloblastic fibro-odontoma and odontoameloblastoma are identical lesions in 1968, World Health Organization (WHO) defined this tumors as two distinctly separate lesions. Clinically, this lesion is an expansile lesion which exhibited little tendency to infiltrate bone. The majority of these tumors were reported in younger patients (mean age 11.5). The maxilla and mandible appear to be equally affected. Altered occlusion and delay in eruption of teeth are the common features. A 10-year-old female patient presented to the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinic of the College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh with chief complaint of huge swelling on the right maxilla, with retained deciduous tooth # 52 and delayed eruption of the tooth # 12. Radiographic interpretation showed well-circumscribed, multilocular cavity in right maxillary bone and right maxillary sinus. Within the cavity are varied amounts of radiopaque material that represented the hard dental structures, and impacted tooth # 13 and # 14. Careful surgical curettage of the entire two lesions and capsular fragment was done. Histopathology report revealed that it is ameloblastic fibro-odontoma. The interesting finding of the present case compared to previous reported cases were the presence of two similar lesions in the same site. This report described a relatively rare odontogenic tumor in a young patient and it emphasizes the importance of including the lesion in the differential diagnosis of any expensile lesion accompanied with delay of eruption of teeth of young age patient.
Ameloblastic fibro-dontoma (AFO) is a rare odontogenic tumor.1-17 According to the WHO classification of odontogenic tumors, AFO is defined as a lesion similar to ameloblastic fibroma (AF) but which shows inductive changes that lead to the formation of dentin as well as enamel.1-16 Treatment of choice for AFO is conservative surgery by enucleation along with the removal of the associated unerupted tooth.1 The interesting finding of the case reported here compared to most of the previous reported cases was that the patient had well encapsulated multilocular lesions occupying the right maxilla both showing same histopathology.
A 10-year-old female patient was referred to the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department at the College of Dentistry of King Saud University in Riyadh with the chief complaint of swelling on the right side of the maxilla and delay in eruption of tooth # 12. The parents noticed that the swelling had started as two small swellings intraorally on the right anterior part of the maxillary bone. Then it increased in size and appeared as one huge lesion over a period of three years. The medical, social and family histories were unremarkable as were the results of a medical review of systems and physical examinations.
In this case study, the lesion grew to a huge size over a 3-year period. The finding of the present case was that multilocular lesions on the right anterior part of the maxillary bone (AFO) should be differentiated from other types of odontogenic tumours. Confusion exists regarding the relationship between AFO, ameloblastic fibroma (AF) and odontoma. Slootweg's15 and Philipsen et al. study18 concluded that AFO was an immature complex odontoma, whereas Regezi and Sciubba10 suggested that AFO was a derivative of AF. In 1968, the WHO declared that AFO and complex odontoma are separate lesions.3-17 Most now agree that AFO exists as a distinct entity but it can be histologically distinguishable from immature complex odontoma. The relative arrangement of the soft tissues and the stage of development of the involved tooth are useful criteria for diagnosis.3
The pathogenesis of ameloblastic fibro-odontoma appears to be from an abnormal proliferation of odontogenic epithelium from a permanent tooth germ, which exerts an organizing effect on the mesodermal element with the formation of calcified dental tissues.18 Histologically, the tumour mass was surrounded by fibrous capsule and was composed predominantly of a fibroblastic connective tissue matrix containing strands of odontogenic epithelium and immature tooth structures including enamel and dentin. There was a moderately cellular stroma with spindle shaped fibroblast.3 The presence of true cystic cavity histologically was supported clinically by the aspiration of cystic fluid. Malignant changes of AFO to ameloblastic fibrosarcoma are extremely rare.2-17 Malignant transformation with metastasis was first reported in a 12 year-old after surgery.2-11 Howell et al.11 reported a case of ameloblastic fibro-odontoma that was converted to ameloblastic sarcoma. According to the literature, local excision is an adequate surgical therapy, usually the associated tooth is removed at the same time. Recurrences of the lesion are rare. It has been reported in the literature that a few cases did recur.9,13,14 Tasogaris and Philipsen13 reported only one patient with local recurrence out of 29 and 86 cases, respectively. Herzog et al.12 reported a case of 14 year-old girl who had radical resection of the mandible after several recurrences.5 The first and second recurrences were found at 5¬6 years, the patient was followed for 14 years. One case of recurrence was shown in each of the four studies by Amos et al.,7 Furst et al.,9 Hooker 14 and Tsagaris,13 respectively. In conclusion, ameloblastic fibro-odontoma is a rare benign odontogenic tumour found in a young age group. It can reach sizeable proportions, as in this case report. Therefore, careful surgical enculation, which has low potential for local recurrence, was the treatment of choice. Careful follow up is recommended.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|











